A MANUAL OF BUDDHISM in its Modern Development – R. Spence Hardy. Many sources from the Singhalese translated by him. 1853.

MEMOIR Reverend Robert Spence Hardy (1803-68)

His intimate acquaintance with manuscripts and other not easily accessible literature made Hardy a 1st-rate authority on all questions relating to the subjects he treated in his particular line of research.” Outros livros do autor: On The Connection of the British Government with the Idolatry of Ceylon, 1834; Eastern Monachism, an Account of the Laws of the Order of the Mendicants, 1850.

PREFACE

It has been my simple aim to answer the question What is Budhism as it is now professed by its myriads of votaries?” “with the exception of one brief interval, I have been at a distance from any public library; I have received no assistance from any society, literary or religious, though that assistance has not been unasked” Deve ser por isso, como veremos, que o livro é tão enfadonho!

My previous work, On Eastern Monachism, describes the discipline, rites, and present circumstances of the Budhist priesthood.” “By the perusal of both these works, the student will be prepared to understand the general outline of the system; as, although its literature is elaborate, its elementary principles are few.” Desconfie desse tipo de religião!

The native authors are not studious of method; and it is a formidable task to reduce their materials to order. [muito menos ‘os Gotamas’…]

it must be remembered that this is the 1st attempt to form an analysis of the deeds and doctrines attributed to Gotama.” E foi uma tentativa fracassada, ou então o budismo está ranqueado caso tão mal quanto o espiritismo na hierarquia dos monoteísmos… Lembrando que eu considero o teísmo ou ateísmo sub-seitas do Grande Monoteísmo.

In the ontological terms I have usually adopted the nomenclature of the Rev. D.J. Gogerly, of the Wesleyan Mission in Ceylon. [a seção ‘metafísica’ nada tem de metafísica ou de diferente das outras, como veremos] It is greatly to be regretted that the writings of that gentleman are so limited; as they are an invaluable treasure to the student of Budhism.”

1. THE SYSTEM OF THE UNIVERSE

THE cycles of chronology are reckoned by asankyas; a word that conveys the idea of innumerable, incalculable, from a, negative, and sankya, number, that of which the sum of quantity can be determined.

The number of the years to which the life of man is extended never remains at one stay. It is always on the increase or undergoing a gradual diminution; but it never exceeds an asankya in length, and never diminishes to less than 10 years; [haha] and the progress of the change is so slow as to be imperceptible, except after long intervals of time. A decrease in the age of man is attached by a correspondent deterioration in his stature, intellect, and morals.” Vivemos um quadro peculiar nos últimos séculos: nossa estatura e expectativa de vida só aumentam, mas também diminuem intelecto e moral. De quanto tempo será a infância dum homem que aos 10 anos já está senil? Menos de 2 anos! É necessário imaginar a gravidez dos grandes homens como a de elefantes, e a vida como a da tartaruga marinha.



From the time that man’s age increases from 10 years to an asankya, and again decreases from an asankya to 10 years, is an antah-kalpa. 80 antah-kalpas make a maha-kalpa.” 80 cycles of ascension & fall (Overkill)

The space to which the light of one sun or moon extends is called a sakwala. Each sakwala includes an earth, with its continents, islands and oceans, and a mountain in the center called Maha Meru; as well as a series of hells and heavens, the latter being divided into dewa-lokas and brahma-lokas. The sakwalas are scattered throughout space, in sections of 3 and 3. All the sakwalas in one section touch each other, [diâmetro triangular] and in the space between the 3 is the Lokantarika hell. Each sakwala is surrounded by a circular wall of rock, called the sakwala-gala.

Were a high wall to be erected around the space occupied by 100,000 kelas of sakwalas (each kela being 10,000,000) [= 1 trilhão de <sistemas solares>], reaching to the highest of the heavens, and the whole space filled with mustard seeds, a rishi [sábio, santo, asceta] might take these seeds, and looking towards any of the cardinal points, throw a single seed towards each sakwala, until the whole of the seeds were exhausted; but though there would be no more seeds, there would still be more sakwalas, in the same direction, to which no seed had been thrown, without reckoning the sakwalas in the 3 other points. [Tudo isso os homenzinhos antigos chamavam de grandiosidade!]

The sakwala systems are divided into 3 classes: 1. Wisayak-setra, the systems that appear to Budha. 2. Agnya-setra, the systems, a 100,000 kelas in number, that receive the ordinances of Budha, or to which the exercise of his authority extends. 3. Jammak-setra, the systems, 10,000 in number, [contagem muito mais restrita: no número 2 era 1 trilhão de sistemas, aqueles que Buda ‘governa’; mas ele só pode nascer num perímetro como o do núcleo de um átomo, quer seja, 10 mil] in which a Budha may be born (between the birth in which he becomes a claimant for the Budhaship, or a Bodhisat, and the birth in which he attains the supremacy), or in which the appearance of a Budha is known, and to which the power of pirit, or priestly exorcism, extends.

There are 3 other sections into which each sakwala is divided: 1. Arúpawachara, the lokas, or worlds, in which there is no perceptible form. 2. Rúpawachara, the worlds in which there is form, but no sensual enjoyment. 3. Kámá-wachara, the worlds in which there is form, with sensual enjoyment.”

Satwa-loka: world of sentient being

Awakasa-loka: world of void

Sanskara-loka: material world (trees, rock, etc.)

At the base of each sakwala is the vacuum called Ajatakasa, above which is the Wa-polowa, or world of wind, or air, 960 yojanas in thickness; the world of air supports the Jala-polowa, or world of water, 480,000 yojanas in thickness and immediately above the world of water is the Maha Polowa, or the great earth, 240,00 yojanas in thickness, which is composed of 2 superior strata, viz. the Sala, or Gal-polowa, consisting of hard rock, and the Pas-polowa, consisting of soft mould, each of which is 120,000 yojanas in thickness. The under surface of the earth is composed of a nutritious substance like virgin honey. In the center of the earth is the mountain called Maha Meru, which, from its base to its summit, is 168,000 yojanas in height. On its top is the dewa-loka called Tawutisa, of which Sekra [rei dos devas, espécie de deus – às vezes sinônimo do próprio Indra] is the regent, or chief. Between Maha Meru and the rocks at the extreme circumference of the earth are 7 concentric circles of rocks, each circle diminishing in height as it increases in extent. Between the different circles of rocks there are seas, the waters of which gradually decrease in depth, from Maha Meru to the outermost circle, near which they are only 1 inch. In the waters of these seas there are various species of fish, some of which are many thousands of miles in size.

In each earth there are 4 dwipas, or continents, the inhabitants of which have faces of the same shape as the continent in which they are born.”

1. Uturukurudiwayina (norte)

2. Puyrwawidesa (leste)

3. Aparagodana (oeste)

4. Jambudwipa (sul)

+. Ao centro dos continentes está Maha Meru.

The sakwala in which Gotama appeared is called magul, festive, or joyous, because it is the only one in which a supreme Budha is ever born [4 acima].”

O umbigo de Jambudwipa se chama Bódhi-mandala. “it contains the bodha, or bo-tree, under which Gotama became a Budha.”

In the earlier ages there were 199,00 kingdoms in Jambudwipa; in the middle ages, 84,000 or 63,000 [depending of the time]; and in more recent ages about 100. In the time of Gotama Budha this continent contained 9,6 million towns”

The sun and moon are at regular intervals seized by the asuras Rahu and Ketu; and these periods are called grahanas, or seizures (eclipses).”

6 dewa-lokas (worlds of happiness)

16 brahma-lokas (worlds of tranquillity and unconsciousness) [alguém tem convites?]

8 narakas (places of suffering)

Under the rock Maha Meru is the residence of the asuras.”

The earth, inhabited by men, with the various continents, lokas, and sakwalas connected with it, is subject alternately to destruction and renovation, in a series of revolutions, to which no beginning, no end, can be discovered. Thus it ever was; thus it will be, ever.”

sakwalas and their destructions:

normally, it is destroyed by fire;

each 8 times, it is destroyed by water instead;

each 64 times, it becomes destructed by wind.

Which means that after 7 fire destructions, comes water destruction. And after 7 water destructions, comes, after the other 7 fire destructions of the next cycle, the first wind destruction, replacing the water destruction that should be the 8th of that cycle.”

80

When the destruction is by the agency of fire, from the period at which the fire begins to burn to the time when the destruction is complete, and the fire entirely burnt out, there are 20 antah-kalpas. This period is called a sangwartta-asankya-kalpa.

From the period at which the fire ceases to burn to the falling of the great rain by which the future world is to be formed, there are 20 antah-kalpas. This period is called a sangwarttastayi-asankya-kamlpa.

From the first falling of the seminal rain to the formation of the sun, moon, rocks, oceans, &c., there are 20 antah-kalpas. This period is called a wiwartta-asankya-kalpa.

After the elapse of 20 antah-kalpas more, a great rain begins to fall; and this period is called a wiwarttastayi-asankya-kalpa.”

the 4 cycles of mundane revolution:

1. destruction

2. continuance of destruction

3. formation

4. continuance of formation

When all 4 cycles (asankya-kalpas) happen, we have a maha-kalpa.”

Um Asankya (ou pseudo-eternidade)

100 milênios = 100 mil anos = 1 laksha

100 lakshas = = 100 x 100.000 = 10 milhões de anos = 1 kóti or kela

100 lakshas de kótis = 10 milhões x 10 milhões = 100 trilhões = 10^14 = 1 prakóti

1 koti de prakotis = 10 milhões x 100 trilhões = 10^8 x 10^14 = 10^20 = 1 kótiprakóti

1 koti de kotiprakotis = 1 nahuta = 10^28

1 koti de nahutas = 1 ninnahuta = 10^36

1 koti de ninnahutas = 1 hutanahuta = 10^44

1 koti de hutanahutas = 1 khamba = 10^52

1 koti de khambas = 1 wiskhamba = 10^60

1 koti de wishkhamba = 1 ababa = 10^68

1 koti de ababas = 1 attata = 10^76

1 koti de attatas = 1 ahaha = 10^84

Quanto não custa rir! ahaha!

The system of the universe:

1 koti de ahahas = 1 kumuda = 10^92

1 koti de kumudas = 1 gandhika = 10^100

1 koti de gandhikas = 1 utpala = 10^108

1 koti de utpalas = 1 pundaríka = 10^116

1 koti de pundarikas = 1 paduma = 10^124

1 koti de padumas = 1 katha = 10^132

1 koti de kathas = 1 maha katha = 10^140

1 koti de maha kathas = 1 asankya = 10^148

De modo que asankya não é propriamente incontável ou infinito… Enfim, patafísica horrorosa!

Os Kalpas

Were the surface of the earth to increase in elevation at the rate of 1 inch in a 1,000 years, and the process to continue in the same proportion, the elevation would extend to 28 miles before the antah-kalpa [ciclo de máximo envelhecimento e a volta à menor duração da vida humana, i.e., 10 anos] would be concluded.”

20 antah-kalpas = 1 asankya-kalpa

4 asankya-kalpas = maha-kalpa

To 1 antah-kalpa there are 8 yugas, 4 of which are called utsarppani and 4 arppani. The 4 utsarppani yogas are progressive, and therefore called urdhamukha; but the 4 arppani are retrograde, and are therefore called adhomukha.”

The 4 utsarppani yugas are called kali, dwapara, treta, krita, respectively; the 4 arppani yogas, krita, treta, dwapara and kali.”

In the Kali age a man will be grey when he is 12; and no one will exceed 20 years of life.”Wilson’s Vishnu Purana.

It would be as great a miracle for a supreme Budha to be born in a kali yuga as for a beautiful and sweet-scented lotus to blow amidst the flames of hell.” “It is only in the asunya kalpas that the Budhas appear (…) When one Budha is born in a kalpa, it is called sara; when 2, manda; when 3, wara; when 4, saramanda; and when 5, bhadra. It is only after very long intervals that the bhadra kalpa occurs.”

1 satya yoga = 1,728,000 anos

1 treta = 1,296,000

1 dwapar = 864,000

kali = 432,000

The year 1852 is the 4,936th year of the kali yug, and the 3,892,936th of the kalpa. (…) It has been remarked that these yugs correspond, in number, succession and character with the golden, silver, bronze and iron ages of the Greek and Roman mythologies.”

The brahmanical kalpa, equal to the whole period of the 4 yugs, consists of 4,320,000,000 (4,32bi) of solar years, which is a day of Brahma; and his night has the same duration. 360 of these days and nights compose a year of Brahama, and a 100 of these years constitute his life, which therefore exceeds in length 300,000,000,000 solar years. This system originates in the descending progression of 4, 3, 2 and 1, according to the notion of diminishing virtue in the several ages, applied to a circle of 12,000 divine years, each of which is equal to 360 years of mortals; and 12,000 multiplied by 360 is equal to 4,320,000. [??? – diferença da ordem de 1000] (…) The chronology of Manetho [sacerdote egípcio] appears to have been constructed upon similar principles, as his dynasties are so arranged as to fill up an exact number of Sothaic circles, or periods of the star Sirius, each comprehending 1460 Julian, or 1461 Egyptian years. Cf. Grote, History of Greece.”

The Sakwalas

1,000 sakwalas = 1 sahasri-lokadhatu

10 lacs x sakwalas = 1 madyama-lokadhatu

1,000 kelas x sakwalas = 1 maha-sahasri-lokadhatu

That space is infinite, that the beings inhabiting it are infinite, and that the sakwalas are infinite is known to Budha, and by him alone is it perceived.”

The doctrine of an infinity of world was taught in Greece by Anaximander and Xenophanes, 428 BC, and by Democritus, 361 BC. They taught that there is at all times an infinity of co-existent worlds (world-islands) throughout endless and unbounded space; and that it is as absurd to think there should be only one world in space as that in an extensive field properly cultivated should grow up no more than one single blade of corn. It was the opinion of Democritus that some of these worlds resemble each other, whilst others are entirely dissimilar.”

By the practice of the rite called kasina, to see to the verge of the rocks that bound the sakwala, and then to conclude that the world is finite, i.e., that beyond these rocks there are no other worlds, is the error called antawada. By the practice of the same rite, to see many other sakwalas and then conclude that the world is infinite, is the error called anantawada. To conclude that the world is finite vertically, but infinite horizontally is the error called anantanantawada. To conclude that the world is neither finite nor infinite, is the error called nawantananantawada. These errors are enumerated by Gotama in the Brahama-jala-sutra as being professed by some of the heretics [cortem-lhe a cabeça!] included in the 62 sects that existed in his day.” Ver último capítulo – ou não, já que dá um sono do cacete!

Maha Meru

Tolices sem fim.

Were a stone to fall from the summit it would be 4 months and 15 days in reaching the earth.”

The Rocky Circles

The idea of the 7 concentric circles around Meru, like that of the 7 strings of the lyre of Orpheus, or the 7 steps of the ladder of Zoroaster, was probably suggested by the previous idea of the orbit of the 7 planets, which it is not unreasonable to suppose had its origin in the number of the days of the week, as appointed in the beginning by God. The city of Ecbatana (the Achmetha of Ezra, 6:2, and the Ecbatana of the Apocrypha, supposed to be the present Hamadan) as described by Herodotus, 1:98, might have been erected as the model of sakwala. The Brahmans teach that there are 7 great insular continents, surround severally by great seas. According to the Bhagavata, Priyavrata drove his chariot 7x round the earth and the rust left by the wheels became the beds of the oceans, separating it into 7 dwipas.”

The Oceans

(*) “Thales held the opinion that the earth floats on the ocean, like a great ship; but this was denied by Democritus, who taught that the earth rests upon the air, after the manner of an immense bird, with its wings outspread. The opinion of the Budhists, that the earth is supported by a world of air, is more scientific than that of those Hindus who believe that it is borne upon a turtoise.”

(*) “The mariners of Phoeacia, according to Homer, had ships endowed with consciousness, that required no steersman.” Bom pra eles!

Uturukurudiwayina

(*) “It is supposed that the legends respecting square-faced or square-headed animals (Herod. iv.109) have had their origin in the appearance of the sea-dogs (phocae vitulinae) that inhabit the lakes of Siberia.” Em nada melhor que Plínio, o Velho

(*) “In speaking of the 4 points, the people of India, like the Hebrews, suppose themselves to be looking towards the rising sun. Hence the same word, both in Sanskrit and Hebrew, signifies alike the front, the eastern quarter and aforetime.”

(*) “There is a resemblance, in position and general character, between the inhabitants of Uturukuru and the Hyperboreans. This happy people, dwelling beyond the influence of Boreas, never felt the cold north wind. Their females were delivered without the sense of pain. The songs and dances at their festivals were accompanied by innumerable flocks of swans. They lived to the age of 1,000 years, and yet without any of the usual accompaniments of senility. (…) When tired of their long existence, they leapt, crowned with garlands, from a rock into the sea.¹ This custom of leaping from high rocks occurs, in precisely the same manner, in Scandinavian legends. – Müller’s Dorians. (…) The opinion that the northern regions of the Earth were formerly warm and pleasant has been confirmed by the investigations and discoveries of geologists.”

¹ Meta de vida, digo, de morte.

(*) “According to Zoroaster, in the reign of Jemshid, the ancient sovereign of Iran, men appeared until death to retain the age of 15.”

This tree is 100 yojanas high, and when the people require anything, it is not necessary that they should go to it to receive it, as the tree extends its branches, and gives whatever is desired.”

There is no relationship, as of father, mother or brother. The females are more beautiful than the dewas. There is no rain, and no houses are required. In the whole region, there is no low place or valley.”

As there is no wood of which to form a pyre, [the dead] are taken to the cemetery and there left.”

When the people of this region pass away, they are always born as dewas or as men, and never in any of the 4 hells.”

The Great Forest

(*) “The most northern parts of the earth are always regarded by the natives of India as the highest. This was also the opinion of the Hebrews, and of the ancients generally. Hence the expression to go down, or descend, is frequently used of going to the south. – 1 Sam. 25:1; 30:15.”

E Davi se levantou e desceu ao deserto de Parã.”

E disse-lhe Davi: Poderias, descendo, guiar-me a essa tropa? E disse-lhe: Por Deus jura-me que não me matarás, nem me entregarás na mão de meu senhor, e, descendo, te guiarei a essa tropa.”

(*) “It has been supposed the word Caesar is derived from the Sanskrit kesa, <hair>, and that the future emperor was so called because he had much hair on his head when he was born.” Many things have been supposed…

The Sun, Moon and Planets

O sol é de corais e ouro.

A lua é de cristal (que me faz sonhar) e prata.

O diâmetro e circunferência do sol e da lua

são basicamente equivalentes.

(*) O CLIMA E A LUA:modern science has proved¹ that there is a real connection between the clearness of the atmosphere and the cold produced at night by the radiation of heat from the earth’s surface, which is impeded by the presence of clouds. As the moon-beam is of course brighter when the atmosphere is clear, it has been supposed that this is the cause of the greater degree of cold, instead of its being a correlative effect.”

¹ Suspeitar desse tipo de construção frasal, sobretudo vindo de homens espiritualistas do séc. XIX!

São caracterizadas 3 estações (ao menos no que tange ao volume de chuvas – alto, baixo e mediano).

Durante a estação seca os gnats (mosquitos) não saem de suas casas; são eles que presidem as precipitações.

the dewas of rain, called ABRA; the dewas of dew, called MAHIKA; the dewas of mist, called DHUMA; the dewas of dust, or motes, called RAJA; and the asur[a] RAHU. The regent of the moon descended to take refuge in Gotama Budha, when attacked by Rahu.” Naruto deve ser Buda.

(*) “Nearly all the astronomical works possessed by the Singhalese are translations from the Sanskrit; but many of the statements that are incidentally made upon this subject in their own books differ materially from the systems now considered to be the most popular upon the continent of India. 1. The Jainas maintain that Meru is in the centre of the earth, around which lies Jambudwipa; that the earth is without support, and is continually falling in space (which may have some relation to the fact that ‘the sun, with his planets, is rapidly darting towards a point in the constellation Hercules’, as taught by modern astronomers); and that the moon is 80 yojanas above the sun, beyond which are the planets, at a still greater distance.”

Os 12 signos do zodíaco:

1. Mesha, red ram. 2. Wrashaba, white bull. 3. Mithuna, woman & man, blue skin-colored, holding an iron rod and a lute. 4. Karkkataka, red crab. 5. Singha, red lion. 6. Kanya, virgin, black skin-colored, in a ship, holding a handful of ears of rice and a lamp. 7. Tula, white man, with a pair of scales in his hand. 8. Wraschika, black elk [alce]. 9. Dhanu, figure of a golden color, half-man, half-horse, with a bow in his hand. 10. Makara, marine monster. 11. Kumbha, white man, holding a water-jar. 12. Mina, 2 fishes, looking opposite ways.” Os mais diferentes são capricórnio e escorpião. Um alce negro no lugar do escorpião; uma figura antropomorfa, muito distante de um inseto.

Os 12 meses:

1 Bak 30 dias 55h 32min¹ 7 Wap 29 dias 54h 7min¹

2 Wesak 31 dias 24h 12min² 8 Il 29 dias 30h 24min²

3 Poson 31 dias 36h 38min² 9 Unduwap 29 dias 30h 53min²

4 Aesala 31 dias 28h 12min² 10 Durutu 29 dias 27h 24min²

5 Nikini 31 dias 2h 10min 11 Nawan 29 dias 30h 24min²

6 Binara 30 dias 27h 22min² 12 Medin-dina 30 dias 20h 21min

¹ Não significaria 2 dias a mais? Implicando o mês mais longo do ano sendo Bak, o janeiro deles, com 32 dias. Ou Poson (nota 2), pois seriam 32 dias e ½!

² Não significaria pelo menos 1 dia a mais? O mês mais curto do ano teria pelo menos 30 dias.

O sol tem 12 casas; a lua, 27.

Os 9 planetas (grahas):

1. Rawi, o sol 6. Chandra, a lua

2. Sukra, Vênus 7. Budha, Mercúrio

3. Kuja, Marte 8. Guru, Júpiter

4. Rahu, 1º asur (deus que causa eclipses) 9. Ketu, 2º asur

5. Saeni, Saturno

The Dewa-Lokas and Brahma-Lokas

There are in all 6 dewa-lokas: 1. Chaturmaharajika, in which one day is equal to 50 of the years of men; 30 of these days make a month, and 12 of these months a year; and as the dewas live 500 of these years, their age is equal to 9 million of the years of men. (…)”

(*) “In the rupa[corporal]-brahma-lokas there are no sensual pleasures, and there is no pain, the enjoyments being intellectual, although there is bodily form, resembling in some measure that which St. Paul may mean by ‘a spiritual body’.” Os arupa-brahma-lokas são mundos de existência somente espiritual.

Thus if the ages in the 6 dewa-lokas and 20 brahma-lokas be added together, it will give a total of 231,628 maha kalpas, 12,285,000,000 [quase 13 bilhões] years.” Pelo menos se parece com a idade do universo segundo a física moderna. Ou seja: há fundamento. Místico – mas há.

Newasannyanasannyayatana, o mundo mais próximo do Nirvana.

The Narakas (Os Infernos)

Há 136 mundos do inferno, mas 8 principais. “The walls [between them] are 9 yojanas in thickness, and of so dazzling a brightness that they burst the eyes of those who look at them, even from the distance of 100 yojanas.”

A etimologia do submundo ou sheol, hades, infernum, hell sempre implica um mundo localizado na Terra, embora escondido (normalmente debaixo da terra) – geralmente um abismo, como em annwn do Druidismo celta. Âmago da alma humana.

Under the great bo-tree, at the depth of 100 yojanas, is the roof of Awichi, the flames from which burst forth beyond the walls, and rise to the height of 100 yojanas.”

a- não

-wichi refúgio

O lugar sem refúgio ou escapatória.

(*) “Homer makes the seat of hell as far beneath the deepest pit of earth as the heaven is above the earth.Virgil makes it twice as far. And Milton thrice.”

(*) “Periphlegethon flows into an extensive district burning with fierce fire; where it forms a lake larger than our own sea, boiling with water and mud. From hence it moves in circles round the earth, turbid and muddy.” Phedro

(*) “Volcanic scoriae and lava streams were portions of Periphlegethon itself, portions of the subterranean melted and evermoving mass.” Humbolt, Kosmos

The Periodical Destruction and Renovation of the Universe

YS: “The part where the sacred tree of Budha is to appear is the first spot of earth that is formed, as it is the last spot destroyed at the end of a kalpa.”

A 100,000 years previous to the commencement of this destruction, one of the dewas from a Kamawachara dewa-loka, pitying the condition of the world, appears with disordered hair, eyes streaming with tears, and a form of woe.(*)

(*) This mission of the déwa bears some resemblance to that of Noah, the preacher of righteousness, during the respite of 120 years previous to the deluge. Gen. 6:3; 1 Pet. 3:20; 2 Pet. 2:5.”

Aftter a long period, a 2nd sun appears suddenly in the sky, and by its rays the 11,575 rivers, and the smaller ponds, tanks and other places are dried up, and white sand is formed. § After another long period a 3rd sun appears, that burns up the 5 great rivers.”

The sun still remains in the sky, but there is no living existence connected with it.”

Um quarto sol destrói até o naraka mais profundo.

OS OCEANOS SÃO MAIS FUNDOS QUE OS ÍNFEROS (Muito além de Cássia Eller): “In due time, a 5th sun appears. By means of this sun the waters of the great ocean are dried up to the depth of 100 yojanas, then of 200, and gradually on to 1,000. They are afterwards dried up to the depth of 10,000 yojanas, and the diminution of the water proceeds until it has extended to the depth of 80,000 yojanas; and thus there will be only 4,000 yojanas of water left.”

TUDO EM VÃO, POIS NÃO HÁ OBSERVADORES: “There is at last about the depth of one tala, then of 7 porisas (the height of a man when his hand is held up over his head, or 5 cubits); gradually it diminishes to the height of a man, to the loins, the knees, and the ancle, to as much as would fill the feet marks of cattle, just as the rain does on the surface of the earth in April or October; and finally, out of all the water of the lakes, seas, and oceans, not so much is left as would moisten the end of the finger. § After another long interval, a 6th sun is formed, when the earth and Meru send forth smoke; and there is thicker smoke, and still thicker, in succession.”

7th sun (of a 7th sum), o número cabalístico que não poderia faltar.

Thus the earth and Meru are entirely destroyed, so as to be no more seen.”

Os sóis continuam a queimar. “whirling, roaring, bursting, blasting, thundering, until the work of destruction is perfect.” Um verdadeiro hino do black metal.

dark void” “This destruction is called Tejo-sangwartta.”

Mas essa 1ª destruição é só aquela pelo fogo; há ainda os ciclos de destruição pela água. O que tornaria essa exposição o sonífero perfeito, caso entrássemos no mesmo nível de detalhes…

This rain is so acrid that it dissolves entirely the earth and all things connected with it, after which the body of water thus produced mingles with the water of the Jala-polowa, upon which the earth had previously rested” “This destruction Is called Apo-sangwartta.”

Perdão, eu estava enganado sobre os tipos de destruição: não são 2 que se alternam somente. Há o “apocalipse do vento”…

The dewas are born, through the exercise of the meditative rite called bhawana, in the brahma-lokas that survive the destruction. The beings in the narakas, through the power obtained from their karma, or moral action, are born in the naraka of some other sakwala; or in an akasa, or aerial abode, [era uma casa muito engraçada… não tinha chão…] formed by the same power. There are other beings that by the power of the rite called wayokasina are born in the brahma-lokas”

Previous to the destruction by water, cruelty, or violence, prevails in the world; previous to that by fire, licentiousness; and previous to that by wind, ignorance.” Talvez estejamos na véspera do MMC das 3 destruições!

That immutable power, Brahma, by waking and reposing alternately, revivifies and destroys in eternal succession, the whole assemblage of locomotive and immoveable creatures.”

Código de Manu

(*) “But by the Peripatetics and others a different doctrine was taught. They were of opinion that the world had never been created and could never be destroyed; as they could trace in the universe no seminal principles, they believed it to be ‘fatherless and eternal, destitute of origin, and beyond the influence of fate.’

2. THE VARIOUS ORDERS OF SENTIENT EXISTENCE

He who is now the most degraded of the demons, may one day rule the highest of the heavens; he who is at present seated upon the most honorable of the celestial thrones may one day writhe amidst the agonies of a place of torment; and the worm that we crush under our feet may, in the course of ages, become a supreme Budha.”

5 gati ou condições:

Dewa, divina

Manusya, humana

Preta, monstruosa

Tirisan, dos brutos

Niraya, infernal

O TOPO DA HIERARQUIA HOMENS-DEUSES: “I. The Pase-Budhas are sages of wondrous power, who never appear at the same time as a supreme Budha; yet in the kalpa in which there is no supreme Budha there is no Pase-Budha. They attain to their high state of privilege by their own unaided powers. Their knowledge is limited; but they never fall into any error that would involve the transgression of the precepts. In the 5 gradations of being enumerated by Nagasena, the Pase-Budhas are placed between the rahat and the supreme Budha. Their relative dignity may be learnt from the announcement, that when alms are given to them it produces greater merit by 100x than when given to the rahats. And that when given to the supreme Budhas it produces greater merit by 16x than when given to them. The supreme Budhas reveal the paths leading to nirwana to all beings; but the Pase-Budhas can only obtain nirwana for themselves. [Assim como um suicida consciencioso apenas se mata; o genocida-suicida, mata muitas pessoas consigo.] They cannot release any other being from the miseries of successive existence. They cannot preach the perfect bana, even as the dumb man, though he may have seen a remarkable dream, cannot explain it to others; or as the savage, who enters a city and is sumptuously fed by some respectable citizen who meets with him, is unable, on his return to the forest, to give his fellow-savages an idea of the taste of the food he has eaten, because they are not accustomed to food of the same kind. But although they cannot teach others, they may themselves attain to a perfect acquaintance with the 4 pratisambhidas, or modes of supernatural illumination.” “It is a rule of the priests in Ceylon who belong to the sect of the Amarapuras not to follow the observances of the Pase-Budhas, unless they have received the sanction of Gotama.

II. The 4th [? – perdi alguma coisa?] of the paths leading to nirvana is called arya, or aryahat. The ascetic who has entered this path is called a rahat. He is free from all cleaving to sensuous objects.” As três anteriores seriam: ser o Buda supremo, ser encaminhado pelo Buda supremo e ser o Pase-Buda?

The mind of the rahat is incapable of error upon any subject connected with religious truth”

There are 5 great powers that the rahat possesses: – 1. Irdhi, or the power of working miracles; he can rise into the air, overturn the earth, or arrest the course of the sun. (…)” Já li o bastante sobre esses poderes de X-Men!…

COMPARAÇÃO MÓRBIDA: “as the trunk of the tree remains unmoved in the storm, though the branches may be subject to violent oscilations.” (Para dizer que o rahat não sente tristeza; é um tronco oco!)

This high state of privilege was sometimes received in an instant; as when the ascetic Nigrodha became a rahat whilst his hair was being cut off to prepare him for the reception of the priesthood.”

In the earlier ages of Budhism, the rahatship was attained by females.” Desde então, só queda no nirvaniilismo, digo, machismo…

At his death, the rahat invariably enters nirvana, or ceases to exist. [E não dá no mesmo?] As the cause of reproduction, karma, is destroyed, it is not possible for him to enter upon any other mode of existence”

To make a false profession of the attainment of rahatship is one of the 4 crimes that involve permanent exclusion from the priesthood.” Punição justa aos Malafaias do Oriente…

III. The moment that man loses the aid of induction, and enters the unseen world, his littleness becomes manifest” ???

There is, therefore, no part of heathenism that is less interesting than its description of other worlds” Sou obrigado a concordar. E lembro os leitores, neste ponto, que demarca aproximadamente 1/3 de nosso percurso, que este grande explanador do budismo é na verdade um cristão! Admiro-o, não ironicamente, pela paciência de um supra-Jó! Publicar um livro em matéria tão insossa… que grande asceta involuntário!

The Pase-Budhas and rahats are equally partakers of humanity; but we must now pass on to the consideration of the unearthly and the monstrous.” Autocrítica?!

The devas resemble the saints of the Romanists, or the kindred dii minores of a more ancient faith, as they are beings who were once men but are now reaping the reward of their prowess or virtue. They reside in a place of happiness; but do not possess the higher attributes of divinity. They receive birth by the apparitional form,¹ are subject to various passions, and in size are more than colossal. Their number must be incalculable by the numeration of mortals”

¹ Essa é uma das maiores baboseiras da doutrina búdica. Veremos mais detalhes à frente!

They endeavour to prevent the acquirement of merit by those whom they fear will supplant them in the possession of the various pleasures and dignities they respectively enjoy.” Deuses invejosos… Mas nem estamos falando de Cristianismo ou Judaísmo!!

The grand principles of Budhism would be complete without the existence of any other orders of being beside those that inhabit our earth, and are perceptible to the senses; and it would agree better with the genius of the system pronounced by Gotama to suppose that, like other sceptics, he believed in neither angel nor demon, than to imagine that the accounts of the devas and other supernatural beings we meet with in works called Budhistical were known at its first promulgation.” Matou a charada. Tudo isso faz com que não devamos dar o menor crédito aos praticamentes do budismo que sustentam que sua crença é atéia. É tão atéia quanto um rosário é usado por devotos sem segundos interesses…

All the accounts of his interviews with devas and brahmas, as well as those which represent these agencies as listening to his words and doing him homage must, it is unnecessary to say, have been the product of a more recent age. [E como essas interpolações são chatíssimas!] It is possible that he may have enunciated the mundane system now attributed to him, and have spoken of other worlds, which his disciples peopled with imaginary beings, in deference to vulgar prejudice or from pride of office, making them ancillary to the exaltation of the sage in whose glory they so largely participated. [Todo discípulo é assim: estraga o mestre.] There is the greater reason to believe that this class of legends has been grafted upon Budhism from a foreign source; as nearly the whole of them may be traced to opinions that are common to almost every school that arose among the Hindus in the period that succeeded the age of Gotama. [Pera lá, meu amigo! Acusar a religião da qual o budismo nasceu como seita herética de ter desvirtuado os ensinamentos de Buda… Quando os hindus tinham mais o que fazer durante todos estes séculos! Talvez o budismo seja apenas uma doutrina ruim e autodestrutiva!] We have a similar process in the hagiology of all the ancient churches of Christendom; and in the traditions of the Jews and Mussulmans, which came not from the founders of the systems, but from the perverted imaginations of their followers in after days.” Comparar os hindus com estes seguidores de Paulo de Tarso é um insulto gravíssimo, fique sabendo!

In some instances the names of the devas and brahmas are the same as those we meet with among the records of Brahmanism; but we are not on that account to confound the religion of the Pitakas with that of the Puranas. Budhism knows nothing of an infinite nihility like Brahm; nor of Brahma, the creator, Vishnu, the preserver, or Siva, the destroyer.” Infinite nihility é meu ovo, de onde nascerá um universo cedo o bastante… “The honour that the Budhists who best understand their religion pay to the devas is extremely small. The priests believe themselves to be higher than the most exalted of these celestial agencies. [no hinduísmo passa-se o mesmo, tolinho – os devas são apenas uma metáfora sobre nosso próprio potencial ilimitado de alçarmo-nos ao divino…] There are dewalas (places of worship dedicated to the dewas) in nearly every village in the Singhalese provinces of Ceylon; but there are few instances, if any, in which a temple is dedicated to any dewa who is prominently mentioned in the sacred books of the Budhists; [Xenofobia contra os habitantes do Sri Lanka!] which is an additional proof that the whole system is an unauthorised adjunct, being either engrafted upon Budhism from the practices of the Brahmans, or brought down from the times preceding the introduction of the bana into Ceylon.”

[sobre a criação de deuses que representam a criação de alguma arte,] the native of India would despise rather than reverence the being who is in any way connected with manual exercises, even in their most pleasing beneficial form. The devas are feared rather than loved; and if their aid is asked, it is in sullenness or with ill-concealed contempt. [há controvérsias]

In many of the accounts that are given us of the attempts of the devas to prevent the rishis [sábios hindus] and others from attaining the high rank that their merit would ensure if permitted to go on to its full development, we have a parallel to the envy with which the gods of the Greeks looked upon the advancement of man in those branches of knowledge that they regarded as being exclusively their own heritage. The story of Prometheus was of most terrible import to all who wished to pass beyond the bounds of common mortality; and the lesson it teaches is heard, with more or less distinctness, in almost every tradition of the mythic age.” Sua antropologia comparada deficitária esqueceu de citar o castigo a todos os descendentes de Adão e Eva por quererem provar do fruto da árvore do conhecimento! Mas o senhor é um reverendo, senhor Spence! Seria pedir muito do senhor tamanho nível de integridade!

IV. The inhabitants of the brahma-lokas have attained to a more exalted state than the dewas. In the worlds in which they have sensuous enjoyment, they are brighter and larger than the dewas, have a larger retinue, more extensive riches, and live to a greater age. [E isso é bom, numa religião que exorta o desapego material e a abstinência?] The rupa (the aggregate of the elements that constitute the body) of the Brahmas differs from that of men, and is one peculiar to themselves. They are insensible to heat and cold, and are entirely free from sexual passion. They have attained their present state of exaltation by the exercise of the rite called dhyana;¹ and when the age allotted to them has passed away, they may be born as men, as animals, or in any other world. (…)”

¹ Nenhum rito é necessário ao verdadeiro bramana. Os ritos são o caminho exotérico às benesses do atingimento da verdade do Um (Brahma).

the lord of the 3 worlds, Budha.”

VI. The Garundas have the shape of immense birds, and are represented as being great enemies to the nagas. § “VII. The Nagas (…) have the shape of the spectacle-snake (…) but many actions are attributed to them that can only be done by one possessing the human form. They are demi-gods.” Nunca passou pela sua cabeça que o Gênese retirou seu conto desta mitologia oriental? Uma serpente que fala e que poderia até andar sobre duas patas – pense a respeito!

If their name be derived from the root naga, a mountain, it may have reference to the place of their abode, under Meru.” “it is possible that the mythological nagas may have had their origin in the fears produced by the ravages of the ancient mountaineers. Another name by which they are known, nayas, bears a considerable resemblance to that of the naiades of the Greeks, who also resided in rivers, lakes and streams. As vigilant as a naya who guards a hidden treasure is a common expression, giving to these beings the same office that is borne by the genii of the Arabs. Even in England there is a current opinion that near abbeys and other old places there are treasures watched over by snakes.” Cobrassss sssão perssuasssivas, assim como o gênio da lâmpada das Mil e Uma Noites!

VII. The Yakas are not to be classed with devils, though this is their popular designation. They are beings whose karma has placed them in the situation they now occupy in the scale of existence; but many of their acts might be attributed to the dewas, as many of the acts of the dewas might be attributed to them [???]

their enmity is to be overcome by exorcism, not by sacrifice.”

They marry, and delight in dances, songs, and other amusements”

in one birth, after he became a candidate of the Budhaship, Gotama was himself a yaka.” Não acredite em deuses que não saibam dançar!

What is the reason, my lord, that many demons are opposed to Budha?”

My lord, there are disciples of Budha who reside in solitary parts of forests, free from noise and tumult, in quiet and retirement, remote from men. In those retired places demons of great power reside, who are opposed to the doctrines of Budha.” Então, talvez, fosse melhor ficar nas cidades!

if any priest or priestess, male or female disciple, fully and perfectly learn this defence, none of the amanusa (not-men), no male or female yaka, etc., will approach him with an evil design, whether walking, standing, sitting, or reclining.” Rev. D.J. Gogerly, Ceylon Friend. Significa que o asceta já se tornou uma bo-tree, ou seja, uma árvore.

X. The Asurs reside under Meru. There were formerly contests carried on between them and the dewas of Tawutisa, but when Manamanawakaya became Sekra, they were finally defeated, and from that time have been kept in subjection.”

The asurs have been compared to the Titans and Giants of the Greeks, as in stature they are immensely greater than any order of being; and as they are connected with eclipses and made war with the dewas, there appears to be some ground for the comparison; it being generally agreed that the giants were personifications of the elements, and that their wars with the gods refer to the throes of the world in its state of chaos.” Dizem que descendemos de gigantes. Isso significa que descendemos verdadeiramente do caos.

XI. The Rakshas resemble the yakas; but they have not, like them, the power to assume any shape that they choose. When appearing to men, they must assume their own proper form. They live principally in the forest of Himala, and feed on the flesh of the dead, whether of beasts or of men.” Personificações do vício da gula.

XIII. The inhabitants of the Narakas endure intense misery; and it was declared by Gotama that those who transgress the precepts will be born in these worlds. To tell the fearfulness of their affliction is difficult; it is like the joining together of all evil things; it is not possible rightly to declare it.” Alguma semelhança com o credo cristão?

The other beings that are introduced as living in different regions and worlds are mere deformities; and are presented before us in all their repulsiveness, without any equivalent to the covering with which the Greeks, in their more cultivated ages, invested beings who in their original shape were equally monstrous.”

The Pase(*)-Budhas

(*) “The word pachcheko, derived from pati-ekan, by permutation of letters contracted into pachcheko and pachche (in Singhalese, pase) signifies severed from unity (with supreme Budhahood): and is a term applied to an inferior being or saint, who is never co-existent with a supreme Budha, as he is only manifested during the period intervening between the nibbana of one and the advent of the succeeding supreme Budha, and attain nibbana without rising to supreme Budhahood.” Turnour, Mahawanso.

It is necessary that he be born of one of the 3 superior castes, as he can belong to no other”

The Dewas

In 1 of our years the devas breathe 216 times, which is 18 times in one of our months, and once in 100 hours. In 100 of our years they eat once.”

The Legend of Lomasa Kasyapa

I am Sekra; if you would become lord of the whole earth you must entreat the rishi Kasyapa, now living in the forest of Himala, to offer a sacrifice of all kinds of animals, from the elephant downwards.”

Primeira recusa

After this Sekra again appeared to the king, and recommended him to send his daughter Chandrawati-dewi to make the same request.”

Segunda recusa – e onde eu mesmo perderia o “jogo”, pois oferecer uma linda princesa já é sacanagem (literalmente)!

At the sight of the princess the rishi forgot the obligations by which he was bound, and was willing to accompany her to the city. On their arrival, the animals were all assembled in the place of sacrifice; but when he lifted up the knife to slay the elephant, the affrighted beast cried out, and all the rest joined in the lamentation. This brought the rishi to his senses; and throwing down the knife, he fled at once to the forest, where he accomplished the requisite amount of merit, and was afterwards born in a brahma-loka. This rishi was the Bodhisat who afterwards became Gotama Budha; [Mas Buda não era infalível? Precisou do grito de um elefante para ‘voltar a si’? Talvez que Buda seja igual o Lula: muito, muito sortudo, segundo os ‘economistas’] as he was under the influence of a temporary madness [paixão!] when he thus resolved upon taking life [away], it is not contrary to the declaration that in every birth he received as a human being he was kind to all sentient existence.” Digamos que Buda praticou o coito interrompido, religiosamente falando!

The Faithful Priest

coming to a place where 4 ways met, [the crooked cross] he was in perplexity as to which was the right path, until the dewa of a neighbouring rock stretched forth a hand, and said In this direction. [Mas os devas não estão sempre dispostos a enganar os ascetas?] Having remained at the wihara [mosteiro] 4 months, he thought of departing on the following morning. But, in the night, as he was walking in the hall of ambulation, he saw a dewa near the steps at the entrance, weeping. (…) ‘Whilst you have remained here, the priests have been at peace with each other; but when you depart, they will again begin to quarrel; therefore I weep.’ The priest, listening, resolved not to leave, and abode there until he attained nirvana.” Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz… Tá difícil, Schopenhauer, tá muito difícil embarcar nesse trem e nesse barco furado!

(…)

Leitura dinâmica em trechos dignos de 1,001 Noites (ou seja: péssimos).

(*) “Brahma put forth in darkness beings emaciate with hunger, of hideous aspects, and with long beards. Those beings hastened to the deity. Such of them as exclaimed, Oh, preserve us! were thence called rakshawas (from raksha, to preserve): others, who cried out, Let us eat, were denominated from that expression yakshas (from yaksha, to eat).Vishnu Purana

3. THE PRIMITIVE INHABITANTS OF THE EARTH; THEIR FALL FROM PURITY; AND THEIR DIVISION INTO 4 CASTES.

Mais ou menos uma genealogia do racismo, hahaha.

NEARLY all the ancient nations of the world, of whom we have any record, carry back their origin to a period immensely remote; nor is this to be wondered at, when we consider that the traditions of the diluvian age must then have been fresh in the memories of men.”

Nimrod, from whom was ‘the beginning of the kingdom of Babel’, was the great grandson of Noah; and the kingdom of Egypt is supposed to have had its origin from Mizraim, the son of Ham. The founders of these kingdoms, therefore, conversed with men who had seen the flood, and who had been witnesses of the most fearful mundane convulsion that had taken place since the formation of our species. Who, in the days of his childhood, when the mind yearns after information relative to the past, and the strangest fiction is received as sober truth, has ever listened to the tales that none are so ready to tell as the aged, whether grandsire or gammer, without the receiving of impressions which the experience of future years can never entirely obliterate?” “the wildest romance ever heard in our day, from lips all garrulous, must be poor and spiritless when compared with the wondrous revelations that the members of the Noachic family could impart”

simple truth (deluge?) > legend > myth > unlimited chronological cycle

The traditions of the Budhists are in unison with this order of development [judaísmo].”

the whole space was void, like the inside of a drum.”

The monarchs of the brahma-lokas, coming to see whether the lotus was formed that indicated whether a supreme Budha will appear in the same kalpa or not, dispersed the darkness in an instant”

Os 5 Budas

there was no necessity for a sun or a moon. (…) no change of seasons was known; there was no difference between night and day; and there was no diversity of sex. Throughout many ages did the brahmas thus live, in all happiness” etc., etc.

As 4 castas de Brahma eram todas perfeitas. O que não faz rigorosamente sentido algum! Mas está no Vishnu Purana!

A NATA da sociedade.

Somente depois fez-se a luz. Uma estranha gênese…

The whole of the brahmas assembled together; and after expressing to each other their regret for the loss of the privileges they had once enjoyed, they determined upon forming a sun.”

SOL

surya > sura > might

wirya > energy

The name of Sun-day was given to the day upon which this luminary was formed.”

LUA

chanda > channa > thought, determination

Do sol à lua. De Brahma aos chandala.

To this day they gave the name of M[o]onday.”

Upon the 5 subsequent days, they caused the 5 planets to appear in order, viz., Kuja, Budha, Guru, Sekra and Saeni”

O LEITE E O IOGURTE CRIARAM AS RAÇAS! “When the brahmas had been long accustomed to eat the terrene production, their skins became coarse; and the complexion of one was light, whilst that of another was dark. This produced pride and contention, by which the substance was deprived of its delicious flavour, and in time entirely disappeared. But in its stead there arose a kind of fungus, in taste like cream mingled with butter, by subsisting upon which the difference in their complexions was increased, in proportion as the brahmas partook of it with more or less avidity. [o melhor é ser do meio, pois!] In process of time the fungus also disappeared, and was followed by a climbing plant called badalata, after which rice of a superior kind was produced. It was pure as a pearl, and had no outward pellicle.”

O SIGNIFICADO DO ARROZ NO CASAMENTO: “By subsisting upon the rice, the apertures of the body were produced, and the generative powers were developed; which led to passion and sexual intercourse.”

the banished [inferior] brahmas were led to build houses as places of concealment and privacy. They then became too indolent to fetch each meal as it was wanted, and accordingly at one journey brought away as much rice as sufficed for many days.” O arroz era um grão sagrado que crescia da semente à madurez em uma só noite. “By degrees an outer integument was formed upon the grain, then a coarse husk, and at last, when it had been cut down it was not renewed. This loss occasioned the necessity of setting limits to the places where it grew” “some of the brahmas became discontented with what they received as their share; and coveting the property of others, they began to make aggressions, and commit theft.”

O governante foi escolhido por sorteio para ser o protetor dos bons contra os ladrões, maus e corruptos. Sammata, o apontado, o eleito. khettani (terra cultivável), Khattiyo, kshatriya (o administrador da terra cultivável). Notar que o governante desse caso não é um rei ou primeiro-entre-os-brahmas, mas um azarado, subordinado! Vê-se que Brahma em verdade tinha criado apenas uma casta de homem; o texto é que se exprimiu de forma tola ao dizer que “as 4 castas eram iguais” (simplesmente eram uma).

Brahmana, aquele que suprime ou pune. Legislador.

HIERARQUIA QUADRIPARTITE

1. OCIOSOS

2. AGRÔNOMOS OU CULTIVADORES DE PLANTAS (PRIMEIROS POLÍTICOS OU SÍNDICOS!)

3. MANIPULADORES DE DINHEIRO

4. CAÇADORES, HOMICIDAS DE ANIMAIS, FUTURAMENTE OS SERVOS.

There were others again who built habitations, and became skilful in the arts, by which wealth is acquired, on which account they were called wessa; and from them originated the waisyas, or caste of merchants.

Again, there were other brahmas who became addicted to hunting; whence they were called ludda or sudda, and from them came the sudras.

Thus arose the 4 great castes; but all the brahmas were originally of one race, and were all equally illustrious. From each of the 4 castes, certain individuals repaired to the wilderness, and became recluses, on which account they were called sumano, or sramanas, ascetics.” Como que à margem dos degraus da escada.

(*) “A.J. Pott supposes that Xerxes is a compound of the Zend ksathra, king (with the loss of the t) and ksahya, also meaning king, the original form of shah.”

more than 150 millions of people are at the present moment subject to the power of the castes.”

[in the Bible,] before the flood there were hereditary distinctions among mankind, founded upon the same causes whence caste is represented by the Budhists to have had its origin. There was first a disctinction moral and religious; ‘the sons of God’, on the one side; and ‘the daughters of men’, the children of an evil generation, on the other. There was, secondly, a professional distinction. It is said that Abel was ‘a keeper of sheep’, and that Cain was a ‘tiller of the ground’, so that in the 1st human family there was a division of labour; but we have no reason to conclude that this distinction was hereditary in the respective households of Adam and Eve”

A ORIGEM DO REBANHO DE OVELHAS PIAS: “after ‘Cain went out from the presence of the Lord’, his former occupation was continued, as God said unto him: ‘When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength.’Gen. 4:12.” Mas se a terra já não dava frutos, qual o sentido? O mais inteligente, até moralmente, na estória de Abel e Caim, seria que o assassino fratricida fosse condenado a desempenhar o ofício do irmão no lugar dele! “Cain (…) abandoned the labour of tillage and ‘builded a cityAh bom. MAS FODEU PARA O HOMEM!

JABAL & JUBAL: “It is said of Jabal, who was of the race of Cain, that he was ‘the father of such as dwell in tents, and such as have cattle’, which would seem to intimate that there was a return, on the part of certain families, to the occupations that were abandoned by the rest of their race. Another individual of the same race, Jubal, is said to be ‘the father of all such as handle the harp and organ’.”

Os “abelardos” não trabalham, só os cainianos! Só rezavam, bancavam os ascetas e, eventualmente, quando o pau endurecia, praticavam a pedofilia!

Gênese 4 é o livro das profissões como um todo.

The most ancient documents that speak decisively of caste are to be found among the Hindus.” O Sudra vem do pé de Brahma, mas o brâmane vem da boca.

Jatimala, or Garland of Classes”

brahma veda, divine sciences

Castas egípcias:

Colchians

Iberians

Medes

Persians

Etrureans

Mais parecem nacionalidades atuais!

Castas mexicanas e peruanas também são citadas.

Wherever tribes are mentioned, in ancient history, before an irresistible change of circumstances led to democratical institutions, there, so far as anything can be discovered of their nature, a difference either of caste or of national descent, is clearly apparent.”

Niebuhr

Müller, Dorians – sobre as castas dos ancestrais dos gregos

The denomination of the 4 Attic or Ionian tribes are supposed to have referred originally to the occupation of those who bore them.” Cf. Grote, História da Grécia (op. cit.)

The descendants of a foreigner remained foreigners to the end of time (…) community of place could no more convert aliens into citizens than it could convert domestic animals into men. (…) but distinctions from race were not of that odious and fantastic character which they have borne in modern times; they implied real differences, often of the most important kind, religious and moral.” Arnold, Thucydides. Ainda não existia algo chamado formação, educação, pedagogia – que lástima!

The number of the Egyptian castes is variously estimated, but in every enumeration the priests are named first, and next to them the military.” Parece que mudanças de casta no Egito eram permitidas e até menos do que raras.

O BOTO & O DRAGÃO: “among the Hindus, a change of caste is as impossible as for the quadruped to become a fish, or the crawling serpent to take unto itself wings and soar towards the sun as an eagle.”

That the Egy. had the power to change their caste is further confirmed by the statement of Herodotus, that the other castes despised the swineherds so much as never to intermarry with them” Ok, tão possível quanto um aristocrata inglês casar com uma mendiga, digamos.

The 3 classes of society that existed among the Saxons were so strongly divided by the laws of caste that no marriage could take place between persons in the different ranks. The severest penalties prohibited intrusion into another rank.

The establishment of caste could not be the work of a moment. For a length of time after the principle began to be manifested, its power would be comparatively trifling and its restrictions few. It would be regarded rather as tending to mutual disadvantage in the social economy, than as necessary or essential. But in India there must have been peculiar circumstances that favoured its development; and when the wearing of the chain had become familiar, the Brahmans rivetted its links most firmly by declaring that its origin was divine, its existence coeval with man, and its character immutable. In other countries there arose institutions that acted as an antagonist to this principle; so that its influence was never paramount, and in time it ceased to exist.

The Brahmans and the Budhists agree as to their estimate of the number of the castes.(*)

(*) In Persia there was a similar division of the human race. <The whole system of Zoraster reposed on a 4-fold division of castes: that of the priests, the warriors, the agriculturists, and the artificers of whatever denomination.> Zend-avesta, 1:141.”

FORÇAÇÃO DE BARRA: “In this light Noah, who in the earlier ages must have been regarded by all mankind with profound reverence, would be represented as adumbrating the Kshatriyas, or the race of the kings; Shem, [Caim?] whose ‘God was blessed’, would be made to represent the Brahmans, or the race of the priests; Japhet, ‘dwelling in the tents of Shem’, would be made to represent the Vaisyas, or the race of the merchants, wandering from place to place, [o judeu atemporal] as was their primitive custom, and taking up their abode in other lands for the purpose of traffic; and Ham, the father of Canaan, ‘cursed’, and ‘the servant of servants unto his brethren’, would be prominently exhibited as the exemplar of the Sudras, the servile race.

When we name the Brahmans as the sacerdotal tribe, we must not regard them as directing their attention to religious duties alone. In the first ages we have no instance of such a restriction. The first priest of whom we read, Melchisedec, was a king regnant. [Mas isso não era no extremo Oriente!] Of the 2nd, Potipherah, we know only his name, title and place of residence; and though he is called a priest, the Chaldee translator renders the word by prince in their idiom. On his appointment as 1st-minister of the king, Joseph was probably admitted into the sacerdotal tribe. Among the Jews, previous to the time of David, the high-priests were generally considered as the rulers of the people, under God as the supreme monarch of Israel; and the Levites appear to have exercised an inferior authority in the provincial towns. There are also instances in after times wherein the king’s ministers, those who were ‘at his hand’, are called priests. 2 Sam. 8:18; 20:23; 1 Reis 4:2; 1 Crôn. 18:17. The priestly office was hereditary after the time of Aaron.”

The high priests of Hephaestos professed to have registers that proved their dignity to have been transmitted through 341 generations, and they had colossal statues of this number of individuals. (Herod. 2, 82)”

(*) “The priests of Egypt resembled, in many aspects, the character given of the ancient Brahmans, inasmuch as they were judges, physicians, and astrologers.”

They were thus the professors of the various branches of science said to have been revealed by the chief Brahma, from whom all the sciences are supposed to be derived, such as astrology, magic, astronomy, etc.”

In the Dasa-brahma-jataka, Gotama is represented as relating the history of a certain noble, Widhura, who in a former age informed Korawya, king of the city of Indupat, in Kuru, that there were 10 kinds of Brahmans.”

1. o médicos ambulantes ou peripatéticos (incluía a função de exorcista);

2. músicos de côrte;

3. “carroceiros”, indivíduos que “pediam esmola” aos reis andando de carruagem – geralmente os reis eram forçados a conceder essa esmola para mantê-los vivos e ociosos;

4. pedintes mais tradicionais, a pé, que batiam de porta em porta e se conservavam tão privados da higiene que viraram verdadeiras árvores, símbolo de que buscavam a purificação espiritual;

5. comerciantes de frutos e mel;

6. agricultores, boieiros, treinadores de aves e proprietários de escravos, todos da mesma categoria – esses davam imensos dotes para suas filhas no himeneu; outrossim, recebiam imensos dotes ao casar um varão;

7. contadores de nekatas, [?] sacrificadores de animais e espécies de açougueiros (vendedores de carne); [No Código de Manu essa função é claramente da terceira casta]

8. oleiros ou vasilheiros, mas diferente dos artesãos também peregrinam para vender sua mercadoria – essa classe também trabalha como guia para pessoas atravessando regiões selvagens;

9. ermitões, vivem da carne de caça de coelhos, iguanas, veados, alguns animais de rio e anfíbios, tartarugas, etc.;

10. os ascéticos propriamente ditos ou ascéticos profissionais (aspirantes a Budas), que iriam às côrtes fazer rituais de bênção aos reis, muito bem-pagos.”

Ressalva: “These are the words of an adversary, or they would lead us to conclude that the ancient Brahmans were something like the Gypsies of Spain and other countries in our own days.”

although there must have been commerce, in the shape of barter, [escambo] during the earliest ages, a considerable period would elapse before the merchant had gained sufficient wealth to cause his occupation to be looked upon as respectable [or calamitous!].”

It is under the character of a wanderer that the ancient merchant is generally represented; he has not only to superintend the sale of his wares, but to accompany them in their transit. Thus is Hebrew the name of the merchant is derived from a root that signifies <to go about, to wander>; in Greek, from transitus; and our own word merchant has a similar signification in the Gothic mergan, to spread.”

By the Singhalese the 3rd caste is generally regarded as being exclusively mercantile, whilst the cultivators form the 1st class of the Sudras. It is said in one of their legends that the 1st merchant was called Wessama, who, having discovered the properties of certain medical productions, afterwards disposed of them for gain.” O Hipócrates lazarento!

It is the more usual course for the cultivators of the soil to be regarded as forming the noblest class of the people, next to those who hold rank as hereditary princes; they are the eupatrids; they form the timocracy; and it is from them the rulers of the State are chosen; as delegates of the king, when the government is monarchical, or as temporary chiefs, when it is an aristocracy. The circumstances of those who reside in the country, whether as proprietors or as labourers, is favourable to the maintenance of respectability of character, as they are exposed to fewer temptations than the merchant, who was necessarily to live in the midst of the luxuries that produce vice. The higher classes among the Greeks were averse to any profession except arms, agriculture, and musical exercises; and the Spartans carried their disdain of all manual occupations so far as to leave even agriculture to the Helots. [ou seja: a segurança alimentar dos espartanos ficava nas mãos dos escravos] The Thracian chiefs also held it disgraceful to cultivate the earth; war and robbery were with them the only paths to honour. On the other hand, the earlier Romans were eminently an agricultural people. (…) But to the Persians, buying and selling appeared to be a mean practice, as they thought it impossible to carry it on without falsehood and cheating; and when Cyrus heard that the Lacedaemonians had a regular market at Sparta, he expressed great contempt for the nation. – Herod. 1:153. When the Lydians revolted against Cyrus, he was advised by Croesus to enforce upon them the wearing of effeminate clothing, the practice of music, and shop-keeping, as by this means they would become women instead of men. [velha anedota conhecida – real ou não, já se tornou algo tão sabido na História Antiga que nem se julga mais necessário citar] Kleon, the tanner, and Hyperbolus, the lamp-maker, are greatly derided by Aristophanes for presuming to engage in politics. [o comediante aristocrata]

The philosophers themselves were not exempt from these prejudices; they supposed that as mechanical arts rendered the body languid, whereby the mind loses its energy, the man who exercises them is unable to fulfil the duties required of him in a free state.”

The ancients, with one mind, esteemed agriculture to be the proper business of the freeman, as well as the school of the soldier. Cato says, the countryman has the fewest evil thoughts. (…) In him the whole stock of the nation is preserved; it changes in cities where foreign merchants and tradesmen are wont to settle, even as those who are natives remove withersoever they are lured by gain. In every country where slavery prevails the freedman seeks his maintenance by occupations of this kind, in which he not unfrequently grows wealthy (…) hence the opinion, that the admitting the artisans to full civic rights is hazardous, and would transform the character of a nation.”

Niebuhr

It therefore appears to be contrary to the analogy presented in other nations, when we see the tribe of merchants in India holding so high a rank” Terceiro em 4 classes não me parece uma posição elevada!

The earliest cause of dissention among the primitive brahmas is said to have arisen from the difference in the colour of their skin. When 2 descendants of an illustrious Brahman became converts to Budhism, Gotama enquired if their change of profession had excited the displeasure of the other Brahmans; and in reply they said it was alleged by their kinsmen, that the Brahmans are ‘the sons of Brahma, sprung from his mouth, pure and fair, while the other castes and sects are sprung from his feet, black and impure’. This statement is in favour of the supposition that the Br. at first confined themselves to some region not far from the place whence the 1st dispersion of mankind commenced, by which the fairness of their complexion was preserved; whilst the other tribes of the Hindus went on towards the south, spreading themselves throughout the entire extent of the peninsula, and penetrating even to Ceylon; by which their complexions would be gradually rendered darker, from their residence under a vertical sun.” Assunção extremamente simplista. “Fairer race” implicaria por um acaso cor da pele, porra?! “hence the proverb Never trust a black Brahman, nor a white Pariah.[!!!]

The Budhist legends agree with revelation in teaching that all men were originally of one race; but with this truth they have mixed up the error that the aborigines of mankind were many. There is also an agreement with the Scriptures, in the statement that men were originally pure, and that they fell from eating a product of the earth.”

There appears to be an intimate connexion between the institutions of caste and the doctrine of the transmigration of souls. Almost in every place where the former has existed we can trace the presence of the latter. Indeed, the custom of caste is so contrary to right reason that its establishment seems to be impossible w/o calling in the aid of some supernatural power to assist in its confirmation. [Engenhosa ligação, mas um ocidental pouco versado em Platão nada sabe das conseqüências sociais deste pensamento tão elevado!] In this respect [ao menos!] there is consistency in the teachings of Gotama; as he rejects caste, and his doctrine on the origin of the intellectual powers, and their extinction at death, is not transmigration. There is caste among the Budhists of Ceylon, but this is contrary to the tenets of the founder of their religion; and their notions on the subject of that which constitutes the ego, the individual man, have been modified in a similar manner; the custom on the one part, and the popular notion on the other, being homogeneous derivations from primitive Budhism.” Seria o budismo a doutrina exotérica do credo esotérico das castas brâmanes?

JUSTIFICATIVA INANE DA EXPLORAÇÃO: “That which gives to caste its real importance, and by which it is exhibited in its most repulsive aspect, is, however, held as firmly by the Budhists as the Brahmans; inasmuch as they teach that the present position of all men is the result of the merit or demerit of former births; a doctrine which, if true, would make the scorn with which the outcast is regarded a natural feeling, as he would be in reality a condemned criminal, undergoing the sentence that has been pronounced against him by a tribunal that cannot err in its decrees. By the Brahman, the Sudra is represented as an object of contempt, because he at first proceeded from the feet of Brahma; but for this statement to have any power, it must be proved [???] that the Sudra was in every previous birth from the beginning of the kalpa, a Sudra; and if the Brahman be honourable on account of having proceeded from the mouth of Br., it must be proved that he has never been any other than a Brahman in all previous generations. Yet it is said by Manu (2:168): ‘A twice-born man, who not having studied the Veda, applies diligent attention to a different and worldly study, soon falls, even when living, to the condition of a Sudra and his descendants after him.’Ou mesmo para a de um proscrito (abaixo dos Sudras).

COMPLACÊNCIA & RESIGNAÇÃO: “In the Sambhuta Jataka [livros budistas] there is an account of 2 low-caste youths who attempted to acquire learning; but for this they were attacked by people of the higher castes, and left for dead. They then went to a distant city, assumed a different dress, that their design might not be frustrated, and passed for Brahmans. [tricksters!] One of them completed his education, but whilst the other was yet at school, a stranger, who was detained all night at the same place on account of a storm, had some hot food placed before him; when, as he seized it too eagerly, his mouth was burnt, and he cried out from pain. The scholar called out to him to put it away quickly, but in so doing he used a low-caste word from forgetfulness, by which his caste was discovered. In the same Jataka, the Sadol, or Chandala, is represented as one who is born in the open air, his parents not being possessed of the smallest hut, where, as he lies among the pots when his mother goes to cut firewood, he is suckled by the bitch along with her own pups. But it was uniformly declared by Gotama that there is no essential difference between the 4 tribes.”

There are more than 100 classes of the Brahmanical caste, each of which has a different name. There appears to be a greater leaning towards caste in Ceylon than in any other Budhistical country, which in part may have arisen from the circumstance that their recent monarchs were of Malabar extraction.”

In Nepal, where Budhism is yet [?] professed, the original inhabitants were all of one caste, or had no caste; but their descendants, in the course of time, became divided into many castes, according to the trades or professions that they followed; but even now we are told that in Nepal caste is merely a popular usage, w/o the sanction of religion, and altogether a very different thing from caste, properly so called. In Tibet and Burma, both of which are Budhistical countries, caste is unknown. In China there are clans, resembling those of the Scottish Highlanders; but this institution differs from caste, and has many features that are peculiar to this singular race.”

[Castes] defy all government; it robs the state of the best energies of many of its most able subjects; it scowls at all innovation; there can be no change, no improvement, wherever it ensconces in its strength” Hoje existe uma casta mundial chamada bilionários.

At an early period after the establishment of Christianity in India by Europeans, it was deemed necessary to institute rules for the guidance of native converts in relation to caste. At the synod of Diamper, in 1599, it was declared that ‘it would rejoice the synod to see the superstitious and absurd customs of the heathen Malabars of the better sort not mixing with the lower, and having no correspondence or communication with those that have but touched any of them, totally abolished among the Christians of this bishopric’; but as many of the Christians resided under heathen princes, it was considered that in these circumstances the customs might be observed lawfully, and w/o scruple. Where these impediments did not exist, as ‘there is no distinction of persons with God, who is Lord of all’, ‘the synod doth command that all that shall be guilty of forbearing to touch such, or having touched them shall wash themselves, to be severely punished as superstitious followers of the heathen customs, and commands the preachers and confessors to admonish them thereof in their sermons and confessions’.” Hm, e aí, e depois, o que aconteceu? Por um acaso algum brâmane em sã consciência se converteria ao cristianismo? James Hough, History of Christianity in India.

Aqui acaba virtualmente qualquer interesse cultural deste livro!

4. THE BUDHAS WHO PRECEDED GOTAMA

The Budhas appear after intervals regularly recurring, in a series that knows neither beginning nor end.” “The whole of the 24 Budhas who preceded Gotama were Kshatriyas, with the exception of the 3 last, Brahmans.”

A VERDADE DO BILHETE: “According to Major Forbes, Kakusanda became a Budha B.C. 3101; Konagamana, B.C. 2099; and Kasyapa, B.C. 1014.” “the Maha Bhadra kalpa of the Budhists [would be] the same as the Kali yug of the Brahmans; but neither of these ideas can be made to agree with the system as it is received in Ceylon.”

The beings who will in due course become Budhas are called Bodhisat.”

I. The era of resolution;

II. The era of expression;

III. The era of nomination.

We have little information of the innumerable Budhas who have appeared in past ages, until we come to the 24 who immediately preceded Gotama; and even their history consists of little more than names and correlative incidents.”

The era of Resolution

The kalpa in which we now live is called Maha Bhadra.”

By virtue of this act may I hereafter become a Budha; and as this is sidharttha oil [of white mustard-seed], may my name in that birth be Sidharttha.”

The era of Expression

During the whole of these ages, in which 387,000 Budhas appeared, Gotama Bodhisat expressed his wish to become a Budha. This was the period called wakpranidhana.” Ridículo.

The era of Nomination; including the History of the Budhas who preceded Gotama

Depreende-se da história dos Budas pretéritos que é muito mais fácil se tornar um nascendo filho de rei! Se você, plebeu, ou chandala, ficar triste com as notícias, console-se: em breve reencarnará como a pessoa certa!

he reigned 10,000 years before he became an ascetic … he exercised asceticism, previous to the reception of the Budhaship … he lived 100,000 years” Dez vezes mais que a “humanidade”.

This long period of remediless ignorance was succeeded by the Maha-bhadra kalpa [período da grande excelência, mostrando que, quando quer, cada fé pode ser tão etnocêntrica quanto a da Europa branca], in which 5 Budhas are to appear; Kakusenda, Konagamana, Kasyapa, Gotama and Maitri. The first 4 have already appeared; and Maitri will be the next Budha who will arive to bless the world.”

NENHUM INTERESSE PARA O ASPIRANTE À INSERÇÃO NA FÉ (QUE ALIÁS É DESINTERESSANTE EM SI!): “Kakusanda remained a laic for the space of 4,000 years, and had an establishment of 30,000 females, but Rochani was his principal queen. At the birth of his son Uttara he left the palace in a chariot drawn by 6 horses, and after performing the necessary rites of asceticism for the space of 8 months, he received the rice-cakes from Wajirendraya, and the kusagrass from Gunasubhadra; and at the root of the tree called sirisa, or mara, he attained the power of a supreme Budha.”

5. GÓTAMA BÓDHISAT: HIS VIRTUES AND STATES OF BEING

Numa quantidade infinita de tempo, toda invidualidade humana passível de existência seria não só todas as demais individualidades humanas como também todas as demais existências animais, vegetais, se é que não outras mais! Por conseguinte, venerar Buda é puro egoísmo. Veneração de nosso ego transcendental.

It is thought that myriads of ages previous to his reception of the Budhaship, he might have become a rahat, and therefore ceased to exist; but that of his own free will, he forewent the privilege, and threw himself into the stream of successive existence, for the benefit of the 3 worlds.” Eu não acredito que em minha reencarnação como Arthur Schopenhauer fui capaz de me prescrever a mim mesmo no século XXI este livro! E ademais Buda é contraditório: tendo alcançado a aniquilação total, ele volta para perpassar todos os sofrimentos para atingir… o nirvana. Absurdo em estado bruto.

the Singhalese Pansiya-anas-jataka-pota, or the Book of the 550 Births, was compiled.”

The work known by this title is a Pali commentary on one of the 15 books belonging to the 5th section of the Sutra Pitaka, or Discourses of Budha, and forms no part therefore of the sacred code; but according to a decision that the comments are of equal authority with the text, it is regarded as of indisputable authority. There is a Singhalese translation of the greater part of it, which is exceedingly popular, not on account of the peculiar doctrines of Budhism contained in it, for these are but incidentally referred to, but from its being a collection of amusing stories which they believe to be unquestionably true. [Mais um livro ruim de estorietas amadas pelo vulgo, como Arabian Nights!] The copy of the Pali comment now before me is written on olas 29 inches long, having 9 lines on a page, and occupies 1,000 leaves or 2,000 pages. The text itself is very scarce; my copy was made from one in the possession of the late chief priest of the Matura district, Bowilla; it contains 340 pages of 9 lines each, written on olas 23 inches long. It is named Jataka Gatha or Birth Stanzas, although a large proportion of them has no reference to any birth, being general maxims or miscellaneous observations.” Rev. D.J. Gogerly, 1838, descrevendo informações absolutamente inúteis.

98% DE NOSSA LITERATURA É MENTIROSA (E CONSIDERO AQUI A PROSA FICCIONAL E OS VERSOS POÉTICOS COMO VERDADES); AS RELIGIÕES, TANTO QUANTO AS GERAÇÕES DE HOMENS, SE SUCEDEM NO TEMPO E NO ESPAÇO ENCHARCANDO O MUNDO COM NOVAS, SEMPRE NOVAS, MENTIRAS ORGULHOSAS: “Not a few of the fables that pass under the name of Aesop are here to be found; and the schoolboy is little aware, as he reads of the wit of the fox or the cunning of the monkey, that these animals become, in the course of ages, the teacher of the 3 worlds, Budha.”

Each Jataka begins with the formula yata-giya-dawasa– era uma vez

CADA UM PUXA A SARDINHA PARA O QUE LHE CONVÉM, E NINGUÉM TEM A PALAVRA FINAL: “The Hindu collection of fables, called the Hitopadesa, is well known. The Jataka-pota bears a considerable resemblance to those parts of the Talmud that are described as consisting of ‘aphorisms and moral sentiments, illustrated by similes and parables, and also by narratives, sometimes real and sometimes fictitious’.” Que código moral apresentaria narrativas ou aforismos tão diferentes um do outro? Nem mesmo seitas da senda da mão esquerda! “Etimologia (origem da palavra senda). Do latim semita, -ae.” (dicio.com.br/senda)

MIL E UM RONCOS EM RELATOS ENFADONHOS: “One tale, after the usual manner of eastern compositions, presents the opportunity for the introduction of several other stories that are only slightly dependent upon the principal narrative. The Singhalese will listen the night through to recitations from this work, w/o any apparent weariness; and a great number of the Jatakas are familiar even to the women.” Esses “bichos”, de acordo com sociedades patriarcais!

O Jataka esta dividido em 9 livros modernos: “The Sujata Jataka [o 1º de todos] is here translated in full, with its introduction; but in the other Jatakas the introduction is omitted, and the narrative much abridged. The 1st Jataka recorded in the original text is the Apanaka [que é com efeito o 2º]; and the last, the Wessantara [9º].”

The virtues and Privileges of the Bodhisat

FAIXA BRANCA, FAIXA CINZA E FAIXA PRETA DO JUDÔ DA VIRTUDE: “There are 10 primary virtues, called paramitas (…) each (…) divided into 3 degrees, ordinary, upa (superior) and paramartha (pre-eminent), (…) [resulting in] 30 paramitas”

JESUITISMO OU ASSISISMO: “3. In the Chulla Suttasoma, and other similar births, he abandoned vast treasures of gold and silver, and numberless slaves, cattle, buffaloes, and other sources of wealth, and thus fulfilled the naiskrama-paramita, which requires retirement from the world.”

“…the giving of that which involves the loss of life, as the head upon which the royal crown has been placed, or the body, to feed lions, tigers, yakas, and rakshas, is the pre-eminent dana.” !?!?!?

Because of his merit, he might always be born in a dewa or brahma-loka, but as in these places he cannot further the purposes of his great intention he prefers being born in the world of men. Other beings must remain the appointed time in these worlds, there being no dangers or accidents by which their departure can be hastened; but as the Bodhisat cannot there perform the paramitas, he has the power to depart at his pleasure. For this purpose he lies down upon a couch, and resolves upon being born in this world (…) This kind of death [after his resolve] is called adhimukti

Teria Togashi se inspirado no credo budista para divisar seu sistema nen? “There are some who excel in purity, and in them wisdom is less evident; others who excel in wisdom, and in them purity is less evident; and others excel in determined courage, and in them purity and wisdom are less apparent.” “After the assurance of the Budhaship has been received, were the Bodhisat to give the most valuable alms everyday during many ages to hasten its reception, no effect of this kind would be produced.” “When there is rice that is accustomed to ripen in 3, 4 or 5 months, no labour of the husbandman can accelerate the period of the harvest, however often he may water it, or whatever pains he may take” Péssima analogia.

* * *

Os 8 tresloucados pré-requisitos do atingimento do status de Buda:

1. ser um humano, e não dewa (o budismo é também uma doutrina ‘blasfema’, falando de todas as outras religiões conhecidas, em que o homem pode mais que deus).

2. ser homem, não mulher (esse era assaz previsível…).

3. estar destinado ao rahat (lembrando que o rahat é já o asceta que atingiu a perfeição em seu modo de vida meritório).

4. deve fazer em algum momento um ritual dedicado ao Buda Supremo, ritual este que por sua vez exige a fé firme e sincera e não apenas o cumprimento da liturgia. (Outra SUPREMA contradição do credo: o Buda Supremo conhecido é só um, Gotama, mas é intuitivo, dados os elementos da doutrina já explanados, que existe potencial para INFINITOS BUDAS SUPREMOS ao longo de uma infinidade de anos e eras e mesmo de mundos de reencarnação. Não contraditório per se, mas paradoxal no sentido de que, ad infinitum, até mesmo o Buda Supremo torna-se algo banal como os Budas menores, que também se tornam banais como qualquer outra existência. A longo prazo, “tudo é indiferente”, mas assim mesmo algumas almas predestinadas sempre se tornam SUPERBUDAS.)

5. deve viver como um asceta (o número 3 indica a apetência a ser asceta; o número 5, a conversão ascética propriamente dita).

6. praticar as virtudes incansavelmente, recebendo de alguém de hierarquia superior no sistema budista a confirmação de que está destinado a ser Buda.

7. deve ter fé na ausência de defeitos de virtude na pessoa deste Buda que o orienta (nº 6), [apesar de ser de hierarquia superior!] e sobretudo fé em que tem a mesma capacidade de atingir a impecabilidade meritória. Em síntese, nesta etapa o candidato a Buda confirma a si mesmo.

8. o exercício diuturno da determinação de ser Buda, ainda que lhe fosse dito que sofreria o tormento do inferno por inúmeras existências para obter este grau.

There are some persons who, on hearing of the afflictions of the Bodhisat, might suppose that his sufferings are excessive; but in reality his enjoyment preponderates.” O Buda mais-nietzschiano-que-schopenhaueriano? “Were a kalpa to be divided into 8 parts, to other beings there is enjoyment in 7 parts; and in one part suffering; [quanto otimismo!] but to the Bodhisat there is enjoyment throughout the whole of the 8 parts.”

He is never born as any kind of vermin; he is never a louse, bug, ant or worm; all other beings receive these births, but the Bodhisat is never born less than a snipe;¹ nor is he born as a serpent or as any other animal of a similar species.” E qual a relevância disso para a moral búdica?

¹ “Any of various long-billed shorebirds of the family Scolopacidae, especially the widely distributed species Gallinago gallinago.”

He is never born blind, dumb, deaf, a cripple or leprous. He is never born as a female. He is never born as one of a doubtful sex.” etc., etc., etc.

INTERESSANTE ALEGORIA ARQUETÍPICA: “The unwise merchant listened to the words of the yaka, [lembrando, demônio disfarçado de gente] and breaking the water vessels so that not a particle of water was left, he drove on. But they did not meet with anything like the appearance of water; the men became exhausted from thirst; and when evening came, they untied the wagons and placed them in a circle, fastening the oxen to the wheels; there was no water for the oxen to drink of for the men to prepare their rice; exhausted, they threw themselves down here and there, and fell asleep. When the night was about half over, the demons came from their city, slew the oxen and men, and devoured them, leaving at their departure nothing but their bones. Thus, through the folly of the merchant, all these beings came to destruction; their bones were scattered abroad; and the 500 wagons were left in the path, full of goods.

About a month and a half after the departure of the unwise merchant, Bodhisat [em uma de suas reencarnações] commenced his journey, after l[e]ading his 500 wagons with goods, and by degrees came to the beginning of the desert. Here he filled his large jars with water, and when the people were encamped, he called them together by beat of drum, and said, ‘No one is allowed to touch even a drop of water without permission from me; there are poisonous trees in this desert; therefore let no one eat any leaf, fruit or flower that he has not been accustomed to before, without my consent.’ After giving this advice, he entered the desert, along with his wagons. When he had arrived at about the middle, the yaka, in the same manner as in the former instance, appeared in the path; but Bodhisat knew him, and reflected, ‘There is no water in this desert; it is on this account that it has received its name of waterless; this person has fearless, red eyes; his shadow does not appear; without doubt, the unwise merchant who preceded me has thrown away his water, so that the men have become exhausted, and then been devoured; this demon knows not my superior wisdom, nor my readiness in expedients.’

My lord, these people say that the verge of a green forest appears in the distance; from thence the rains are constant; they are adorned with lotus flowers, and carry red and white water flowers in their hands; they are eating the roots of water plants; and their garments are dripping with wet; it will be better, therefore, to throw away our water, that we may lighten our wagons, and proceed more quickly.’

Did you ever hear from anyone that there is either lake or pond in this desert?’

We never heard of any such thing; is it not called the Waterless Desert?’ [ótimo nome!]

The men we saw told us that the verge of a green forest, where the rains are constant, appears in the distance. Now to what distance does the rainy wind extend?’

It blows about a yojana.’

Well, has anyone of you all felt this wind?’

No, sir.’

How far may the rain-cloud be seen?’

About a yojana.’

Has anyone of you all seen it?’

No, sir.’

To what distance does the lightning appear?’

About a yojana.’

Has any one of you all seen its flash?’

No, sir.’

How far can the sound of the thunder be heard?’

We have not heard it, sir.’

Good people, these are not men; they are demons; they wish us to throw away our water, that when we are exhausted they may devour us; the unwise merchant who preceded us, will have thrown away his water and been destroyed; the 500 wagons will be left in the road, full of goods, and we shall find them; do not throw away a single drop of water, but drive on with all haste.’ Além de escapar à tentação do deserto, enriqueceu! Benjamin Franklin ficaria encantado!

On their arrival at the place of merchandise, Bodhisat sold his goods at a high price, and the whole company returned in safety to their own city.”

The followers of the reasoner came to a great destruction; whilst the followers of the non-reasoner (who has an intuitive perception of the truth) were preserved from the demon, went in safety to the place at which they wished to arrive and then with great satisfaction returned in safety”

One day, when at the house of a carpenter, whose head was bald, like a copper porringer, a mosquito alighted thereon; and the carpenter called to his son, who was near, to drive it away. The son, taking a sharp axe for this purpose, aimed a blow at the insect, but split his father’s head in two, and killed him. On seeing what was done, Bodhisat said that an enemy was better than a foolish relative or friend.”

O LEÃO E O CHACAL: Uma história de amizade no reino animal.

Wessantara … This son was the Bodhisat who in the next birth but one became Gotama Budha. From the moment he was born … he could speak”

The prince enquired why she had come at an improper hour, when she said that she had been troubled by a dream, in which a black man came and cut off her 2 arms and plucked out her heart. Wessantara rejoiced to hear her dream, as he saw that the time for fulfilling the paramitas had come”

After the brahman had partaken of some fruits that were set before him, Wessantara enquired why he had come; and he replied that he had come to ask the gift of his 2 children. On hearing this request, the prince told him that he was the best friend he had yet met with, as others had asked only the elephant or the chariot; but that their mother was thus absent, and as it would be right for her to see them before their departure, he would have to remain until the next day. The brahman said that he could not stay so long; and that if he did not receive the children now he must go away without them. Wessantara then informed him that if he took them to his royal parents, he would be rewarded with many gifts; but he replied that if he were to take them to the city it would cost him his life, when it became known in what way he had received them, [as slaves] and that the prince must decide whether he would give up the children or not. Jaliya and Krishnajina, on hearing this conversation, fled away in extreme terror, and hid themselves under the leaves of a lotus growing in a pond near their dwelling.

By this time Wessantara had resolved upon giving his children to the brahman without any further delay; but when he called them they did not make their appearance.”

The brahman may take me; I am willing to become his servant; I cannot remain here and listen to my father’s cries’

as Wessantara reflected that if he did not give up his children he could not become a Budha, and would be unable to release sentient beings from the miseries of repeated existence, he called them to the pansal, and pouring water on the hands of the brahman, delivered them to him, saying, ‘May I by this become the all-knowing!’Aonde não chega o fanatismo!

Wessantara made no reply, and as Jaliya was asking him why he was silent, Jujaka approached bleeding, and looking like an executioner who had just been taking the life of some criminal. The children trembled with fear when they saw him. Unable to retain them both, as Kirshnajina ran away when he seized Jaliya, and the sister when he seized her brother, he tied them together by a with [corda de vime], and began to drive them along with a stick, beating them as they went. Looking at their father, they told him to see the blood streaming down their backs, and to consider the pain they endured.”

If my children have to suffer this before my eyes, what will they not have to endure when they are at a distance. How can they pass over hills, thorns, and stones? When they are hungry, who will feed them? When their feet are swollen, who will give them relief? When the cold wind chills them, who will administer unto them comfort? How will the mother who has borne them in her bosom grieve when she returns at night, and finds that they are gone?’ Thus thinking, he resolved to drive away the brahman, and receive them again.

O super-indeciso.

Ye well-known dewas, and ye animals with whom we have sported, let our mother know the manner in which we thus pass along the road!’

The prince now informed her that he had given them away in alms to an aged brahman, that the pre-requisites of the Budhaship might be fulfilled. Then Madri-dewi replied, ‘The Budhaship is more excellent than a 100,000 children!’ and rejoicing in the reward that was to be obtained from this gift, wished that it might be extended to all the beings in the world.”

Wessantara, on seeing him, asked why he had come, and he replied, ‘I am now old and powerless; I have no one to assist me; I have therefore come to receive the princess as my slave.’ The prince looked in the face of Madri-dewi; and she, knowing his thoughts, expressed her willingness to comply with the wish that had been expressed; whereupon he delivered her to the supposed brahman, that the gift might assist in the reception of the Budhaship. When the brahman received her, he said, ‘The princess now belongs to me; that which belongs to another, you have not the right to give away; therefore keep her for me until I shall return.’ Then, assuming his own form, Sekra informed Wessantara that all the dewas and brahmas had rejoiced in the gifts he had offered; and assuring him that he would most certainly attain the Budhaship, he informed him that in 7 days his relatives would come to him, together with his children, and that he would again receive the kingdom.”

When Sanda [pai de Wessantara, rei] found that they were his grandchildren, he placed the boy upon one knee, and the girl upon the other, greatly rejoicing, and ordered many presents to be given to the brahman, who, however, from eating too much, died at midnight. The next day his body was burnt upon a costly pyre.”

When the prince perceived that among the elephants was the animal he had given to the king of Kalinga he felt ashamed, as it had been presented in alms; when told, however, that it had been returned by the people, as there was now plenty in the land, he was satisfied.”

Wessantara and the princess again received the kingdom; and after reigning in conformity with the 10 precepts of kings, he was reborn in the dewa-loka called Tusita.”

the dewa Sekra became the priest Anurudha” Poderia não ser este? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Aakra_(Buddhism) Mas este livro possui inúmeras divergências de grafias, então não apostaria, neste momento. Creio que sejam as mesmas figuras. “Kirshnajina became the priestess Upphala”

6. THE ANCESTORS OF GOTAMA BUDHA

Maha Sammata, the first monarch of the world. Several of the names, and some of the events, are met with in the Puranas of the Brahmans, but it is not possible to reconcile one order of statement with the other; and it would appear that the Budhist historians have introduced races, and invented names, that they may invest their venerated sage with all the honors of heraldry, in addition to the attributes of divinity.”

The chakrawartii is a universal emperor. There are never 2 persons invested with this office at one time. The grammatical etymology is, He who abides in, or rules over, an extensive territory, called a chakra. (Vishnu Purana)”

The ancient Egyptians had a king who reigned 3 myriads of years; but even this period is nothing to an asankya. Satyavarta, the first of the solar race of princes among the Hindus, reigned the whole of the satya-yug, or 1,728,000 years. Berosus informs us that the first 10 kings of Chaldaea reigned 120 sari, the sarus being a period of 3600 years. Thus the 10 kings give 432,000 years, the same extend as a kali-yug.” “From the time the untruth was told, the dewas ceased to be guardians of the kings, and 4 princes were appointed in their place. (…) the Ganawara.” “This was the first murder committed in the world. The evil that came upon these kings was a warning to their successors, so that they pursued a different course”

The Jews have a tradition that Abraham was the first man who ever turned grey. His beard became grey when Isaac attained the age of manhood, that he might be distinguished from his son, who exactly resembled his father.” Hahaha.

Os 29 primeiros reis eram supremos e cheios de luz, blá-blá-blá…

The Maha-sammata-wansa was now lost, and the Makhadewa race commenced. There were 84,000 princes of this race (…) The last of these kings, Kalaranjanaka, did not become an ascetic, as his predecessors had done, and the Makhadewa race ceased.” “The last of these kings was Okkaka II.” “The last of these princes had a son called Amba, or Okkaka III.”

These women are witches, and have overcome my better judgement by their wiles”

At this time, the Bodhisat who afterwards became Gotama Budha was the ascetic Kapila, and resided in a forest, near a lake”

The eldest sister was therefore appointed as the queen-mother, and each of the brothers took one of the other sisters as his wife.”

7. THE THE LEGENDARY LIFE OF GOTAMA BUDHA

unless a boldness of divination, liable as it is to abuse, be permitted, all researches into the earlier history of nations must be abandoned.”

Niebuhr, nas únicas sábias palavras desse resumo e compêndio insosso de mentiras

and a gifted critic may one day arise, who, by his discriminating skill, will be enabled to arrange every subject under one or other of these 4 classes – the pure fiction, the uncertain, the probable and the established fact. In the mean time, we must be content with the legend in its received version, with all the accumulations it has gathered in successive ages.” Puro detrito “histórico”.

Com efeito, tudo é baboseira ilegível!

Well, Kantaka, you must assist me tonight, that by your aid I may be enabled to release all sentient beings from the perils of existence, and he then mounted upon his back.”

If I receive as much food as a sesamum seed in size, it would be sufficient; I require nothing more than a pepper pod, or a small fruit; with only this I can still live.”

The prince has endeavoured to become Budha, but has failed in the attempt; he is now dead.”

8. THE DIGNITY, VIRTUES AND POWERS OF BUDHA

(…)

9. THE ONTHOLOGY OF BUDHISM

We have now done with the ancient legend, and its supernatural accompaniments.” Já não era tempo! Começa agora um CURSO INTENSIVÃO de budismo (o que o livro deveria ter se dedicado a ser pelo menos 400 páginas atrás!!). Como veremos, entretanto, a expectativa de que fosse um bom material foi vã!

9.1 PREFÁCIO DO “CURSO”

OS SEIS KHANDAS

1. Os cinco Khandas ou partes do Khanda

2. O corpo organizado ou rupan (a alma no sentido laico, pseudo-alma no budismo)

3. Sensação ou wedana (con-tato)

4. Percepção ou sannya (subordinada à sensação)

5. Discriminação ou sankharo (subordinada à sensação)

6. Consciência ou winyana (subordinada ao corpo organizado)

62 seitas heterodoxas do budismo (hmmmm…)

Seitas “voltadas para o passado” (18):

4 seitas: reconhecem a eternidade da existência mediante a reminiscência ou “indução”.

4 seitas: alguns seres são eternos e alguns vivem apenas em mutabilidade (transcendência x mundanidade).

4 seitas: o mundo é finito ou infinito ou infinito “lateralmente” mas não “perpendicularmente” ou é de natureza indeterminável. (urgh!)

1 seita: os céticos e os em erro (rá!)

5 seitas: o mundo não possui uma causa primeira, pois na existência pregressa do Ser no mundo de Brahma não há consciência.

Seitas “voltadas para o futuro” (44):

16 seitas: existe a vida após a morte, com consciência, seja material, imaterial ou um estado híbrido ou “nenhum dos dois”, finita ou indefinidamente extensa, ou uma mistura de ambos (finita e infinita), ou nenhuma.

8 seitas: existe apenas insciência após a morte.

8 seitas: existe um estágio intermediário entre a consciência e a inconsciência.

7 seitas: a morte é aniquilação.

5 seitas: existe um caminho para a felicidade suprema. (?!)

Nenhuma das 62 seitas possui a verdade.” Ó!

Não pode haver, de acordo com o budismo, um processo como a transmigração, no sentido usual do termo.”

A mente oriental muito sofreu por sua inclinação pela analogia e pela metáfora.”

O que é o homem? São os olhos o homem? É evidente que nem os olhos, nem os pés, nem o coração, nem outra nomenclatura de partes do corpo são o homem. SILOGISMO: Logo, não há homem. Homem é um nome. MAS eles esquecem que, diferente duma carroça e suas rodas, que só estão conectadas espacialmente, há um mistério não esclarecido entre os membros do corpo e o corpo (…) um nexo da vitalidade

paticha samuppada, ou causas da existência continuada.

Três tópicos do vocabulário búdico:

I. ignorância (awidya)

II. apego a objetos existentes (upadana)

III. mérito e demérito (karma)(*)

(*) Escopo claramente mais restrito que no hinduísmo.

Como adveio a ignorância?”

Como a cadeia da existência foi forjada?”

O karma primário não deve ser discutido.”

O relato bramânico da origem da ignorância é mais inteligível, embora não mais satisfatório (do que a remissão a uma desconhecida causa primeira).”

Segundo o Vishnu Purana, Brahma tentou criar o universo 9 vezes. Na primeira, criou apenas o amovível e ignorante. Tendo aprendido com seu erro, repetiu a operação 8 vezes, cada vez obtendo maior sucesso. Awidya é o próprio Brahma.

O mundo é um ovo da noite”

Demócrito

mus araneus: mesmo conceito provindo do Egito.

O erro, no budismo, se concentra num só ponto: se os seres vivos não reproduzem (abominam a ignorância), não existe upadana a longo prazo. Essa sentença resume toda esta filosofia de vida. O que a existência faz diante do budismo? Pois upadana sempre vence. O mundo não acaba. A Europa não acaba. Budismo é epifenômeno insignificante de upadana. Nirvana nada mais é que o reconhecimento do mal absoluto, e a fraqueza diante dele. Além disso, o budismo é uma criação do último homem: antinatural, uma blasfêmia contra a natureza. A revolta da razão.

O nascimento espectral: quando um gênio destoante nasce, impossível de explicar logicamente. Exemplo: eu em minha família sou um nascimento espectral. Não estou ligado ao mérito-demérito daquela árvore, sou indiferente a ela, fenômeno novo, “absurdo”, porém predito e necessário.

Este conceito fabuloso e todo-poderoso chamado karma é mera abstração. É dito que é achinteyya, sem consciência. É uma potência criadora e cega, como a terra fértil.”

O karma age como uma doença hereditária; seu mal pode estar latente por gerações [de renascimentos], e de repente irromper com violência descontrolada.”

O budista, no sentido correto, portanto, está fadado a morrer sem esperança. [no status de sua próxima vida]”

O karma será destino até que deixe de regular a moral no universo, ponto de viragem em que a coletividade senciente “o vence”. E no entanto nunca se falou em salvação coletiva universal, como é impossível que reproduções aconteçam (no fundo: cada um que cuide do seu cu, digo, de seu pênis e de sua vagina). O budismo não é revolucionário, é apenas egóico como todo cisma.

MAU SINAL: “Não tenho conhecimento de nenhuma teoria ou sistema com que o budismo concorde. Nem qualquer teoria moderna, salvo a de Johan Gottlieb Fichte, quem ensinou: o arranjo dos sentimentos morais e as relações, a ordem moral do universo, é Deus.’

Cometas surgem como os peixes, por generatio spontanea

Kepler

Zeus vs. Moirae

Enquanto o budismo declara o karma como sendo o poder supremo que controla o universo, ele é um sistema ateu. Ignora a existência de uma divindade pessoal e inteligente. Reconhece que há um governo moral do mundo; mas honra o livro em vez do legislador; e adora o cetro em vez do rei.”

9.2 KHANDAS (INÍCIO DO CURSO P.D.) [agora não! agora não! agora sim? agora sim!]

9.2.1 Os cinco khandas

Todos os seres são causados, mas é impossível descobrir a causa do ser.”

9.2.2 O corpo organizado

Mais futilidades pseudometafísicas… “O corpo organizado está dividido em 28 partes ou setores. 1. terra; 2. água; 3. fogo; 4. vento; 5. olho [!]. 6. ouvido; 7. nariz. 8. língua. 9 o ‘corpo’. 10. a aparência externa. 11. o som. 12. o cheiro. 13. o gosto. 14. a substância, ou seja, aquilo sensível ao toque. 15. o feminin. 16 o masculino. 17. o coração. 18. a vitalidade. 19. o espao. 20. a comunicação silenciosa. 21. a faculdade da fala. 22. a leveza. 23. a elasticidade. 24. a adaptação. 25. a agregação. 26. a duração. 27. a decadência. 28. a impermanência.”

1. terra. dividida em 20. O cabelo da cabeça é terra, a carne é terra, o cabelo do corpo é terra, bem como as unhas, os dentes, a pele, as veias, os ossos, a medula, os rins, o coração (físico), o fígado, o abdôme (intestino, estômago), o baço, os pulmões, as fezes, o cérebro.

2. água. 12. bile, fleuma, pus, sangue, suor, gordura, lágrimas, soro ou sangue, saliva, muco, lubrificação das juntas, urina.

3. fogo. 4. fogo da vida, fogo da tristeza, fogo da enfermidade e fogo do estômago que queima a comida (hahaha!). Gotama não era tão bem-dotado intelectualmente se demorou tantos kali-yugas para fazer um sisteminha tão mequetrefe…

4. vento ou ar. 6. o sopro que ascende; o sopro que descende; o sopro da respiração; o sopro excretório (esse pessoal tem mesmo fixação por isso!), outro sopro relacionado aos intestinos (???) e o sopro total, regulador do movimento. Causa secundária da ação, em conjunto com hita, a mente.

5 a 9. os cinco órgãos dos sentidos (e lá vamos nós de novo!). prasada-rupas.

Khandas que são conectados a algum objeto sensível, ou por esse objeto são nutridos, são chamados aharaja; aqueles conectados às faculdades mentais (abstratas) não podem ser divididos, e são chamados chittaja.”

17. coração, a sede do pensamento. A causa da mano-winyana (consciência).

18. vitalidade. o princípio da vida. O karma atua sobre o corpo organizado para produzir a essência da existência. Interliga todos os rupa-khandas.

19. espaço. 9 aberturas, buracos ou não-preenchimentos no corpo (vazios inerentes à vida). já comentado.

22. a leveza pode ser kaya (corporal) ou chitta (mental).

o coração possui wastu, substância; mas não dwara, apertura, ou uma ‘porta’, como o olho; alguns [dos 28 atributos] não têm substância nem abertura, por ser invisíveis. (…) os ekaja, procedentes de uma causa; os dwija, procedentes de duas causas ou mais.”

9.2.3 Sensação

(…)

9.2.4 Percepção

(…)

9.2.5 Discriminação

55 categorias, dentre as quais as faculdades morais.

1. Phassa, o que Kant poderia chamar de apercepção (percepção a-conceituada).

2. wedana; explicado como sensação, então não sabemos por que não está no tópico anterior. No entanto, pode incluir “sensações” mais elaboradas, como a “felicidade” no sentido filosófico, além da “gratificação” por comer uma boa comida (sensação inferior).

3. sannya, percepção – reflexão sobre a percepção das formas, seria mais bem-dito.

4. chetana, pensamento – considerada a faculdade mais ágil das 55. A explicação, entretanto, parece muito mais a de reflexo ou de instinto, no lugar de reflexão, o que aliás explicaria sua enumeração como ágil, quase instantânea. Capacidade incessante, está sempre alerta, nunca sofre interrupções.

se não houvera partilha do pensamento o ofício do professor seria em vão”

16 formas da produção do pensar: reflexão, incluindo reminiscências; instrução de outrem; consciência (memória); satisfação (?); aversão; verossimilhança; separação/análise; diálogo; signos; impressões; números (os dois últimos poderiam ser linguagem – separação muito incompetente); instrução; meditação; mediante livros; vizinhança (proximidade geográfica!); hábito. Enfim, uma grande porcaria de “análise”…

5. manaskara, a reflexão reiterada.

7. individualidade

8. atenção

9. exame e obtenção da certeza (análogo à lógica aristotélica)

10. resolução

11. alegria

12. determinação

13. firmeza

15. ética

19. afeição

34. compaixão

39. cobiça

44. falta de vergonha

50. preguiça [que isso, afinal, os pecados capitais?]

9.2.6 Consciência

89 categorias. Chega! Não quero mais esses catálogos e inventários inúteis!

9.2.7 Identidade; Individualidade; e Retribuição Moral.

(Assim como os elementos da existência são incluídos dentre os 5 khandas, é evidente que o budismo não reconhece a existência de um espírito ou alma; e essa asserção não é feita gratuitamente, sem a autoridade adequada, provinda de fontes adicionais [ao próprio Buda], principalmente das Perguntas de Milinda.)”

Milinda x Nagasena

NAGASENA: Eu sou chamado Nagasena por meus pais e pelos gurus e pelos outros; mas Nagasena não é uma existência, um ser, um homem.

REI MILINDA: Então quem recebe seus sacrifícios? Quem pratica os preceitos? Se alguém matara Nagasena, este alguém não seria então apontado como assassino? Você não foi ensinado, nem se tornou sacerdote brâmane? Quem é Nagasena? O que é Nagasena? São os dentes Nagasena? Pele, carne, coração ou sangue são Nagasena? Seu semblante é Nagasena? São os 5 sentidos Nagasena? Tirando-se os 5 sentidos, o que sobra é Nagasena?

NAGASENA: Não para todas as perguntas.

MILINDA: Disse inverdades.

NAGASENA: Vossa Majestade veio a pé ou em carroça?

MILINDA: Em carroça.

NAGASENA: O que é uma carroça? É o ornamento que cobre a carroça? As rodas, o raio das rodas? (…)

MILINDA: A carroça é só um som, um nome. Ao dizer que veio transportado por uma carroça, Vossa Majestade mentiu.”

Oratória manjada…

(Mediante uma interrupção da narrativa de Nagasena, um fragmento da obra chamada Amawatura explicará seu argumento relativo ao Eu, o self.)”

Trechos extremamente aborrecidos…

9.2.8 Reprodução

Devas, pretas and the beings in hell are born by the apparitional birth, not from the womb”

blablablá…

9.2.9 Karma

O autor disse que percorreria a ontologia do budismo, mas continua contando apenas diálogos lendários e insípidos.

9. THE ETHICS OF BUDHISM

Quem sabe não é agora que esse livro preste alguma serventia…

Brincadeira! Muito longe disso…

Enumera os pecados humanos. Ceticismo, ingerir drogas e adultério aparecem igualados ao homicídio. zZzZzZz.

Texto ininteligível e sem alma. Para mim significa apenas ceticismo moral extremo, a.k.a., niilismo.

Whosoever will, may come to the cross, and be made happy. The stream that issues therefrom ‘cleanses from all sin’. This doctrine may be, as in the days of its first manifestation, ‘unto the Jews a stumbling-block, and unto the Greeks foolishness’, but unto all who are willing to test its truthfulness, it will prove to be ‘the power of God and the wisdom of God’.” Ótimo! Nada como terminar o livro com um pouco de xenofobia!

the now myriad-worshipped Budha will not have a single votary; and Jesus of Nazareth, ‘who over all, God blessed for ever’, will be the life, and the blessedness, and the glory of universal man.” Portanto, não custa lembrar, o livro foi escrito por um cristão entusiasta! Mas ele está errado: nem Buda, nem Cristo… Ninguém!

NOTA PÓSTUMA OU NÃO-DIRETAMENTE CONECTADA COM A LEITURA

Consta de pesquisa na matéria na internet que o budismo Mahayana, ainda que esotérico, contradiz muito do afirmado neste manual do séc. XIX: “[o Mahayana] defende que todas as pessoas são possuidoras da felicidade absoluta, o estado de buda (iluminação).” O que é o mesmo que dizer nada e tudo ao mesmo tempo.

ATTIC NIGHTS, Loeb Classical Library Edition (J.C. Rolfe) – Aulus Gellius

Fonte primária (ver esclarecimento em Translation logo abaixo): https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Gellius/home.html

Notas do Prof. Thayer

The Text on LacusCurtius and Elsewhere

On October 5, 2006 David Camden’s Forum Romanum, after a run of nearly 10 years providing a very useful index to Latin literature online, and many of the texts themselves, suddenly disappeared.

One of the most useful texts that had been there and nowhere else, at least in full, was Aulus Gellius’ Noctes Atticae. These pages on LacusCurtius are therefore in the nature of an emergency rescue: I retrieved them from Google’s cache of the expired website, reformatted them to match my usual habits, inserted local links at the chapter and section numbers, and threw them back online; at which point, after a fair amount of work on my part which I’m not about to let go for naught, Forum Romanum happily reappeared online, and is still online today (2020).

At some point then I’ll go thru the text, convert the Greek (currently transliterated), conform it to the Loeb edition, add the occasional critical notes in that edition, apply a consistent format, etc. (…)

A partial transcription of Gellius — whether from the same edition as this one or not, I haven’t checked — may be found, unidentified as to source, here. [em latim]

Translation

The English translation, on the other hand, was not online anywhere, and having been dragged into this particular author by a sort of accident, I’m taking advantage of it to input it here from scratch. It is the one by J.C. Rolfe, first published in 1927 in 3 volumes as part of the Loeb Classical Library, and revised in various years. Volumes I and II of my exemplar are in the public domain for sure; [até o BOOK XIII, dos 20 de Gélio] Volume III may not be; if not, I will use another edition, of course.” Thayer está provavelmente esperando direitos autorais da obra vencerem para postar do BOOK XIV ao BOOK XX traduzidos em inglês. Você lerá fragmentos destes capítulos mais adiante, extraídos de outra fonte, porém bastante diminutos (não por qualquer questão legal: trata-se da parte menos interessante deste livro que, em geral, é excepcional para quem está praticando e ampliando seu vocabulário em latim, mas uma leitura medíocre, senão apenas ruim, composta de anedotas empoladas e eruditas sem qualquer liame ou ponto em comum. Maior parte dos parágrafos se refere a “problemas de gramáticos”, como seriam chamados os lingüistas da época, sobre grafias corretas de palavras do latim ou possíveis etimologias das palavras, ou versos polêmicos de autores mais antigos, enfim, coisas triviais para nós.

PREFACE

Autor chato e pedante que começa dizendo que todos os outros escritores são chatos e pedantes, mesmo que jurem que não o são. Sim, se isso não é Literatura Clássica é ao menos um comportamento clássico de escrevinhador! Além disso, trata-se do Montaigne da Antiguidade: ADORA, em caps lock, citar outros autores, ao ponto de causar náusea no leitor. Pensa-se menos através dos gênios do passado do que através de si mesmo. Embora possa parecer que não, a própria motivação para escrever uma obra própria se perde caso seja dada preferência apenas aos ditos dos outros. Isso também vale para Plutarco. O gênio verdadeiro pode ter os outros em mente, mas cria conteúdo, filosofa, ensaia, critica ou inventa (narrativas, épicos) com o próprio sopro, com a própria alma como motor. Veremos muito menos aspas num livro verdadeiramente digno de ser lido.

P.13 Now just because there will be found in these notes some few topics that are knotty and troublesome, either from Grammar or Dialectics or even from Geometry, and because there will also be some material of a somewhat recondite character about augural or pontifical law, one ought not therefore to avoid such topics as useless to know or difficult to comprehend. For I have not made an excessively deep and obscure investigation of the intricacies of these questions, but I have presented the first fruits, so to say, and a kind of foretaste of the liberal arts; and never to have heard of these, or come in contact with them, is at least unbecoming, if not positively harmful, for a man with even an ordinary education.

P.14 Of those then, if such there be, who may perhaps sometimes have leisure and inclination to acquaint themselves with these lucubrations, I should like to ask and be granted the favour, that in reading of matters which they have known for a long time they shall not scorn them as commonplace and trite”

P.19 For those, however, who have never found pleasure nor busied themselves in reading, inquiring, writing and taking notes, who have never spent wakeful nights in such employments, who have never improved themselves by discussion and debate with rival followers of the same Muse, but are absorbed in the turmoil of business affairs — for such men it will be by far the best plan to hold wholly aloof from these ‘Nights’ and seek for themselves other diversion.”

P.22 Up to the present day I have already completed twenty books of notes.”

P.24 Thus the number of books, given the Gods’ gracious help, will keep pace with the years of life itself, however many or few they may be, nor have I any desire to be allotted a longer span of existence than so long as I retain my present ability to write and take notes.”

BOOK I

1.1 In the treatise(*) which he wrote on the mental and physical endowment and achievements of Hercules while he was among men, Plutarch says that the philosopher Pythagoras reasoned sagaciously and acutely in determining and measuring the hero’s superiority in size and stature.

(*) This work, probably entitled Βίος Ἠρακλέους, has not survived.”

(*) “The phrase ex pede Herculem has become proverbial, along with ex ungue leonem, ab uno disce omnes (Virg. Aen. II.65 f.).”

(*) “Clarissimus became a standing title of men of high rank, especially of the senatorial order.”

3.6 I myself secretly voted for conviction, but I persuaded my fellow judges to vote for acquittal. 3.7 Thus I myself in a matter of such moment did my duty both as a judge and as a friend. But my action torments me with the fear that there may be something of treachery and guilt in having recommended to others, in the same case, at the same time, and in a common duty, a course for them contrary to what I thought best for myself.

3.21 Theophrastus,¹ however, in the book that I have mentioned, discusses this very question more exhaustively and with more care and precision than Cicero.”

¹ Maior discípulo de Aristóteles.

3.31 …Chilo of old, having heard a man say that he had no enemy, asked him if he had no friend, believing that enmities necessarily followed and were involved in friendships.

10.2 You, on the contrary, just as if you were talking today with Evander’s mother, use words that have already been obsolete for many years, because you want no one to know and comprehend what you are saying. Why not accomplish your purpose more fully, foolish fellow, and say nothing at all? 10.3 But you assert that you love the olden time, because it is honest, sterling, sober and temperate. 10.4 Live by all means according to the manners of the past, but speak in the language of the present, and always remember and take to heart what Gaius Caesar, a man of [un]surpassing[?] talent and wisdom, wrote in the first book of his treatise On Analogy:​ ‘Avoid, as you would a rock, a strange and unfamiliar word’.

15.6 Provided this fact be recognized, that neither should one commend the dumbness of a man who knows a subject, but is unable to give it expression in speech, nor the ignorance of one who lacks knowledge of his subject, but abounds in words; yet if one must choose one or the other alternative, I for my part would prefer tongue-tied knowledge to ignorant loquacity. (Cicero)”

15.8 That man is never silent who is afflicted with the disease of talking, as one in a lethargy is afflicted with that of drinking and sleeping. For if you should not come together when he calls an assembly, so eager is he to talk that he would hire someone to listen. And so you hear him, but you do not listen, just as if he were a quack. For a quack’s words are heard, but no one trusts himself to him when he is sick. (Cato)”

15.10 …For a crust of bread he can be hired either to keep silence or to speak.

20.2 …A ‘plane’ figure is one that has all its lines in 2 dimensions only, breadth and length; for example, triangles and squares, which are drawn on a flat surface without height. 20.3 We have a ‘solid’ figure, when its several lines do not produce merely length and breadth in a plane, but are raised so as to produce height also; such are in general the triangular columns which they call ‘pyramids’, or those which are bounded on all sides by squares, such as the Greeks call κύβοι, and we quadrantalia. 20.4 For the κύβος is a figure which is square on all its sides, ‘like the dice,’ says Marcus Varro,​ ‘with which we play on a gaming-board, for which reason the dice themselves are called κύβοι.’ 20.5 Similarly in numbers too the term κύβος is used, when every factor​ consisting of the same number is equally resolved into the cube number itself, as is the case when 3 is taken 3 times and the resulting number itself is then trebled.”

22.9 Now Julius Paulus, the most learned man within my recollection, used to say with keenness and understanding that superesse and its Greek equivalent had more than one meaning: for he declared that the Greeks used περισσόν both ways, either of what was superfluous and unnecessary 22.10 or of what was too abundant, overflowing and excessive; that in the same way our earliest writers also employed superesse sometimes of what was superfluous, idle and not wholly necessary, a sense which we have just cited from Varro, and some, as in Cicero, of that which indeed surpassed other things in copiousness and plentifulness, yet was immoderate and too extensive, and gushed forth more abundantly than was sufficient.”

23.4 It was formerly the custom at Rome for senators to enter the House with their sons under age.​ 23.5 In those days, when a matter of considerable importance had been discussed and was postponed to the following day, it was voted that no one should mention the subject of the debate until the matter was decided. The mother of the young Papirius, who had been in the House with his father, asked her son what the Fathers had taken up in the senate. 23.6 The boy replied that it was a secret and that he could not tell.

23.7 The woman became all the more eager to hear about it; the secrecy of the matter and the boys’ silence piqued her curiosity; she therefore questioned him more pressingly and urgently. 23.8 Then the boy, because of his mother’s insistence, resorted to a witty and amusing falsehood. He said that the senate had discussed the question whether it seemed more expedient, and to the advantage of the State, for one man to have 2 wives or one woman to have 2 husbands. 23.9 On hearing this, she is panic-stricken, rushed excitedly from the house, 23.10 and carries the news to the other matrons. Next day a crowd of matrons came to the senate, imploring with tears and entreaties that one woman might have 2 husbands rather than one man 2 wives. 23.11 The senators, as they entered the House, were wondering at this strange madness of the women and the meaning of such a demand, 23.12 when young Papirius, stepping forward to the middle of the House, told in detail what his mother had insisted on hearing, what he himself had said to her, in fact, the whole story exactly as it had happened. 23.13 The senate paid homage to the boy’s cleverness and loyalty, but voted that thereafter boys should not enter the House with their fathers, save only this Papirius; and the boy was henceforth honoured with the surname Praetextatus, because of his discretion in keeping silent and in speaking, while he was still young enough to wear the purple-bordered gown.”

(*) “If a man was emancipated after having children born to him, the latter remained under the control of their grandfather and were legally orphans”

Platner & Ashby, Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome

Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities

BOOK II

3.1 The letter h (or perhaps it should be called a breathing rather than a letter) was added by our forefathers to give strength and vigour to the pronunciation of many words, in order that they might have a fresher and livelier sound; and this they seem to have done from their devotion to the Attic language, and under its influence. 3.2 It is well known that the people of Attica, contrary to the usage of the other Greek races, pronounced ἱχθύς (fish), ἵππος (horse), and many other words besides, with a rough breathing on the first letter.​ 3.3 In the same way our ancestors said lachrumae (tears), sepulchrum (burial-place), ahenum (of bronze), vehemens (violent), incohare (begin), helluari (gormandize), hallucinari (dream), honera (burdens), honustum (burdened). 3.4 For in all these words there seems to be no reason for that letter, or breathing, except to increase the force and vigour of the sound by adding certain sinews, so to speak.

3.5 But apropos of the inclusion of ahenum among my examples, I recall that Fidus Optatus, a grammarian of considerable repute in Rome, showed me a remarkably old copy of the second book of the Aeneid, bought in the Sigillaria for 20 pieces of gold, which was believed to have belonged to Virgil himself. In that book, although the following 2 lines were written thus:

Before the entrance-court, hard by the gate,

With sheen of brazen (aena) arms proud Pyrrhus gleams,

we observed that the letter h had been added above the line, changing aena to ahena.”

5.1 Favorinus used to say of Plato and Lysias: ‘If you take a single word from a discourse of Plato or change it, and do it with the utmost skill, you will nevertheless mar the elegance of his style; if you do the same to Lysias, you will obscure his meaning.’

11.1 We read in the annals that Lucius Sicinius Dentatus, who was tribune of the commons in the consulship of Spurius Tarpeius and Aulus Aternius,​ was a warrior of incredible energy; that he won a name for his exceeding great valour, and was called the Roman Achilles. 11.2 It is said that he fought with the enemy in 120 battles, and had not a scar on his back, but 45 in front; that golden crowns were given him 8 times, the siege crown once, mural crowns 3 times, and civic crowns 14 times; that 83 neck chains were awarded him, more than 160 armlets, and 18 spears; he was presented besides with 25 decorations; 11.3 he had a number of spoils of war,​ many of which were won in single combat; 11.4 he took part with his generals in 9 triumphal processions.”

17.1 After careful observation Marcus Tullius noted that the prepositions in and con, when prefixed to nouns and verbs, are lengthened and prolonged when they are followed by the initial letters of sapiens and felix; but that in all other instances they are pronounced short.

17.2 Cicero’s words are:​ ‘Indeed, what can be more elegant than this, which does not come about from a natural law, but in accordance with a kind of usage? We pronounce the first vowel in indoctus short, in insanus long; in immanis short, in infelix long; in brief, in compound words in which the first letters are those which begin sapiens and felix the prefix is pronounced long, in all others short; thus we have cŏnposuit but cōnsuevit, cŏncrepuit but cōnficit. Consult the rules of grammar and they will censor your usage; refer the matter to your ears and they will approve. Ask why it is so; they will say that it pleases them. And language ought to gratify the pleasure of the ear.’

17.3 In these words of which Cicero spoke it is clear that the principle is one of euphony, but what are we to say of the preposition pro? For although it is often shortened or lengthened, yet it does not conform to this rule of Marcus Tullius. 17.4 For it is not always lengthened when it is followed by the first letter of the word fecit, which Cicero says has the effect of lengthening the prepositions in and con. 17.5 For we pronounce prŏficisci, prŏfugere, prŏfundere, prŏfanum and prŏfestum with the first vowel short, but prōferre, prōfligare and prōficere with that syllable long.”

17.8 Moreover cōligatus and cōnexus are pronounced long.

17.9 But after all, in these cases which I have cited one can see that this particle is lengthened because the letter n is dropped; for the loss of a letter is compensated by the lengthening of the syllable.”

18.1 Phaedo of Elis belonged to that famous Socratic band and was on terms of close intimacy with Socrates and Plato. 18.2 His name was given by Plato to that inspired dialogue of his on the immortality of the soul. 18.3 This Phaedo, though a slave, was of noble person and intellect,​ and according to some writers, in his boyhood was driven to prostitution by his master, who was a pander. 18.4 We are told that Cebes the Socratic, at Socrates’ earnest request, bought Phaedo and gave him the opportunity of studying philosophy. 18.5 And he afterwards became a distinguished philosopher, whose very tasteful discourses on Socrates are in circulation.”

18.9 Diogenes the Cynic also served as a slave, but he was a freeborn man, who was sold into slavery. When Xeniades of Corinth wished to buy him and asked whether he knew any trade, Diogenes replied: ‘I know how to govern free men.’18.10 Then Xeniades, in admiration of his answer, bought him, set him free, and entrusting to him his own children, said: ‘Take my children to govern.’

But as to the well-known philosopher Epictetus, the fact that he too was a slave is too fresh in our memory to need to be committed to writing, as if it had been forgotten.”

23.1 I often read comedies which our poets have adapted and translated from the Greeks — Menander or Posidippus, Apollodorus or Alexis, and also some other comic writers. 23.2 And while I am reading them, they do not seem at all bad; on the contrary, they appear to be written with a wit and charm which you would say absolutely could not be surpassed. 23.3 But if you compare and place beside them the Greek originals from which they came, and if you match individual passages, reading them together alternately with care and attention, the Latin versions at once begin to appear exceedingly commonplace and mean; so dimmed are they by the wit and brilliance of the Greek comedies, which they were unable to rival.

23.4 Only recently I had an experience of this kind. 23.5 I was reading the Plocium or Necklace of Caecilius, much to the delight of myself and those who were present. 23.6 The fancy took us to read also the Plocium of Menander, from which Caecilius had translated the said comedy. 23.7 But after we took Menander in hand, good Heavens! how dull and lifeless, and how different from Menander did Caecilius appear! Upon my word, the armour of Diomedes and of Glaucus were not more different in value.”

23.9 This is Menander:

Now may our heiress fair on both ears sleep.

A great and memorable feat is hers;

For she has driven forth, as she had planned,

The wench that worried her, that all henceforth

Of Crobyle alone the face may see,

And that the famous woman, she my wife,

May also be my tyrant. From the face

Dam Nature gave her, she’s an ass ‘mong apes,

As says the adage. I would silent be

About that night, the first of many woes.

Alas that I took Crobyle to wife,

With sixteen talents and a foot of nose.

Then too can one her haughtiness endure?

By Zeus Olympius and Athena, no!

She has dismissed a maid who did her work

More quickly than the word was given her,

More quickly far than one will bring her back!

23.10 But Caecilius renders it thus:

In very truth is he a wretched man,

Who cannot hide his woe away from home;

And that my wife makes me by looks and acts:

If I kept still, I should betray myself

No less. And she has all that you would wish

She had not, save the dowry that she brought.

Let him who’s wise a lesson take from me,

Who, like a free man captive to the foe,

Am slave, though town and citadel are safe.

What! wish her safe who steals whate’er I prize?

While longing for her death, a living corpse am I.

She says I’ve secret converse with our maid —

That’s what she said, and so belaboured me

With tears, with prayers, with importunities,

That I did sell the wench. Now, I suppose,

She blabs like this to neighbours and friends:

Which one of you, when in the bloom of youth,

Could from her husband win what I from mine

Have gained, who’ve robbed him of his concubine.’

Thus they, while I, poor wretch, am torn to shreds.”

26.3 Favorinus said: ‘More distinctions of colour are detected by the eye than are expressed by words and terms….’

29.20 …

This adage ever have in readiness;

Ask not of friends what you yourself can do.”

(*) “the festival of the Sigillaria; this was on Dec. 21 and 22, an extension of the Saturnalia, although not a religious holiday.”

(*) “The Romans awarded a great variety of military prizes, which are here enumerated, for the most part, in descending order of importance. Phalerae were discs of metal worn on the breast like medals, or sometimes on the harness of horses; the spears were hastae purae, unused (hence ‘bloodless’) and perhaps sometimes headless weapons, although they are represented with 2 heads on 2 tombstones (Cagnat et Chapot, Arch. Rom. II, p. 359, and Bonner Jahrbücher, 114 (1905), Plate 1, Fig. 4). Besides golden crowns without a particular designation, there were others which are enumerated and described in V.6.”

(*) “For ‘analogy’ in this sense of ‘regularity’, see II.25. Gellius thought that coegi was an irregular form because did not contract, as oi did in cogo; but contraction of like vowels did not take place when the second was long; cf. coāctus. Cicero’s rule is correct, because a vowel is naturally long before ns and nf. The case of pro is quite different. The ō in cōpertus is due to contraction from co-opertus. Cōligatus is a very rare form; Skutsch, quoted by Hosius, thought it might come from co-alligatus. The ō in cogo is also due to contraction (co-ago, co-igo), which does not apply to the perfect coegi. Compensatory lengthening takes place usually when an s is lost, as is cōnecto for co-snecto, or n before s and f; less commonly when nc is lost before n.”

(*) “Gellius, as he sometimes does elsewhere, refers to Favorinus’ statement as if it were his own. Gronovius’ proposed change to dixit and dixerit is unnecessary.”

(*) “Homer (Iliad VI.234 ff.) tells us that Diomedes proposed to exchange armour with Glaucus in token of friendship. Diomedes’ arms of bronze cost 9 oxen; those of Glaucus, inlaid with gold, 100. Hence ‘gold for bronze’ became proverbial.”

(*) “We should use ‘grey’, rather than ‘green’. Glaucus was a greyish green or a greenish grey.”

BOOK III

(*) “Ritschl estimated Varro’s publications as 74 works, comprising 620 books.”

(*) “The sestertium was the designation of a thousand sesterces, originally a gen. plur., later a nom. sing. neut.”

Friedländer, Roman Life and Manners

BOOK IV

(*) “Penitus, like Penates, is connected with penus in the sense of an inner chamber. Penus is derived by some from the root pa- of pasco, pabulum, etc.; by others it is connected with πένομαι and πόνος, as the fruit of labour. Walde, Lat. Etym. Wörterb. s.v., separates penus, an inner chamber, from penus, a store of provisions, connecting the latter with pasco, the former with penes, penetro and Penates.”

(*) “Walde, Lat. Etym. Wörterb. s.v., regards paelex and the Greek πάλλαξ and παλλακίς, the former in the sense of a young slave, as loan words from the Phoenician-Hebrew pillegesh, ‘concubine’. The spelling pellex is due to popular etymology, which associated the word with pellicio, ‘entice’.”

(*) “The spears sacred to Mars and the sacred shields (ancilia) were said to move of their own accord when danger threatened. According to Dio, XLIV.17, they shook violently before the death of Caesar.”

(*) “In the Latin line the ictus falls on the penult Hánnibális, but the ordinary pronunciation was Hanníbalis.”

(*) “On nefasti dies it was impious for legal business to be carried on, or assemblies held.”

(*) “The sense of relinquo as = ‘avoid’ is shown below (§10); that of careo is explained by Paul. Fest. (pp. 62 and 298, Lindsay, s.v. denariae and purimenstrio) as referring to doing without, or refraining from, certain things on ceremonial days. Some Roman etymologists derived caerimonia from the town of Caere, others from caritas; see Paul. Fest. p. 38, Linds.”

(*) “Made him an aerarius, originally a citizen who owned no land, but paid a tax (aes) based on such property as he had. The aerarii had no political rights until about the middle of the 5th century B.C., when they were enrolled in the 4 city tribes.”

(*) “More literally, inpolitia is ‘lack of neatness’, from im-, negative, and polio, ‘polish’, from which pulcher also is derived.”

(*) “Gellius is partly right. As in+capio and in+salio became incipio in insilio, so ob+iacio became obiicio. As the Romans disliked the combination ii, only one i was written, but both were pronounced, and the syllable ob was thus long ‘by position’. In the early Latin dramatists the scansion ăbicio indicates that the i was syncopated and the semi-vowel changed to a vowel. See Sommer

(*) “A splendid example of the majesty and fairness of Roman law, all the more so that it is not particularly unusual; and one, not altogether incidentally, that clearly proves wrong the notion currently prevailing in some circles, that the Romans maltreated women (self-serving corollary: we ourselves are enlightened). The net effect of the ruling was to uphold the rights of a prostitute against the private actions of a man who in public life was a high Roman magistrate; it is similar to, and among the ancestors of, the ruling that ordered U.S. president Bill Clinton to pay $90,000 to Paula Jones for perjuring himself in a lawsuit and thus violating her civil rights: to my mind at any rate, the rule of law, one of the hallmarks of Western civilization, is the single greatest treasure bequeathed us by ancient Rome.”

BOOK V

3.1 They say that Protagoras, a man eminent in the pursuit of learning, whose name Plato gave to that famous dialogue of his, in his youth earned his living as a hired labourer and often carried heavy burdens on his back, being one of that class of men 3.2 whom the Greeks call ἀχθοφόροι and we Latins baiuli, or porters. 3.3 He was once carrying a great number of blocks of wood, bound together with a short rope, from the neighbouring countryside into his native town of Abdera. 3.4 It chanced at the time that Democritus, a citizen of that same city, a man esteemed before all others for his fine character and his knowledge of philosophy, as he was going out of the city, saw Protagoras walking along easily and rapidly with that burden, of a kind so awkward and so difficult to hold together. Democritus drew near, and noticing with what skill and judgment the wood was arranged and tied, asked the man to stop and rest awhile. 3.5 When Protagoras did as he was asked, and Democritus again observed that the almost circular heap of blocks was bound with a short rope, and was balanced and held together with all but geometrical accuracy, he asked who had put the wood together in that way. When Protagoras replied that he had done it himself, Democritus asked him to untie the bundle and arrange it again in the same way. 3.6 But after he had done so, then Democritus, astonished at the keen intellect and cleverness of this uneducated man, said: ‘My dear young man, since you have a talent for doing things well, there are greater and better employments which you can follow with me’; and he at once took him away, kept him at his own house, supplied him with money, taught him philosophy, and made him the great man that he afterwards became.

3.7 Yet this Protagoras was not a true philosopher, but the cleverest of sophists; for in consideration of the payment of a huge annual fee, he used to promise his pupils that he would teach them by what verbal dexterity the weaker cause could be made the stronger, a process which he called in Greek: τὸν ἥττω λόγον κρείττω ποιεῖν, or ‘making the word appear the better reason’.”

7.1 Cleverly, by Heaven! and wittily, in my opinion, does Gavius Bassus explain the derivation of the word persona, in the work that he composed On the Origin of Words; for he suggests that that word is formed from personare. 7.2 ‘For,’ he says, ‘the head and the face are shut in on all sides by the covering of the persona, or mask, and only one passage is left for the issue of the voice; and since this opening is neither free nor broad, but sends forth the voice after it has been concentrated and forced into one single means of egress, it makes the sound clearer and more resonant. Since then that covering of the face gives clearness and resonance to the voice, it is for that reason called persona, the o being lengthened because of the formation of the word.’

9.1 The son of king Croesus, when he was already old enough to speak, was dumb, and after he had become a well-grown youth, he was still unable to utter a word. Hence he was for a long time regarded as mute and tongue-tied. 9.2 When his father had been vanquished in a great war, the city in which he lived had been taken, and one of the enemy was rushing upon him with drawn sword, unaware that he was the king, then the young man opened his mouth in an attempt to cry out. And by that effort and the force of his breath he broke the impediment and the bond upon his tongue, and spoke plainly and clearly, shouting to the enemy not to kill king Croesus. 9.3 Then the foeman withheld his sword, the king’s life was saved, and from that time on the youth began to speak. 9.4 Herodotus in his Histories is the chronicler of that event, and the words which he says the son of Croesus first spoke are: ‘Man, do not kill Croesus.’

(*) “Gellius is wrong in supposing that ve- strengthened the force of a word; it means ‘without, apart from’. Nonius cites Lucilius for vegrandis in the sense of ‘very great’, but wrongly; see Marx on Lucil. 631. Vescus means ‘small, or, in an active sense, ‘make small’ (Lucr. I.326); Walde derives it from vescor in the sense of ‘eating away, corroding’ (Lucr. I.326) and from ve-escus in the sense of ‘small’. Vemens, for vehemens, is probably a participle (vehemenos) from veho.”

(*) Vediovis, or Veiovis, was the opposite of Jupiter, ve- having its negative force. He was a god of the nether world and of death; hence the arrows and the she-goat, which was an animal connected with the lower world (see Gell. X.15.12, and Wissowa Religion und Kultus, p. 237). Some regarded the god as a youthful (little) Jupiter and the she-goat as the one which suckled him in his infancy; others as Apollo, because of the arrows, but the she-goat has no connection with Apollo.”

(*) “A basic understanding of the physics of sound led to the invention of the telephone (unlike most of our modern machines, a relatively simple device that could just conceivably been invented by some clever ancient Greek)”

BOOK VI

6.1 Nature has given 5 senses to living beings; sight, hearing, taste, touch and smell, called by the Greeks αἰσθήσεις.​ Of these some animals lack one and some another, being born into the world blind, or without the sense of smell or hearing. 6.2 But Aristotle asserts that no animal is born without sense of taste or of touch.

9.1 Poposci, momordi, pupugi and cucurri seem to be the approved forms, and today they are used by almost all better-educated men. 9.2 But Quintus Ennius in his Satires wrote memorderit with an e, and not momorderit, as follows:

Tis not my way, as if a dog had bit me (memorderit).

9.3 So too Laberius in the Galli:

Now from my whole estate

A hundred thousand have I bitten off (memordi).

9.4 The same Laberius too in his Colorator:

And when, o’er slow fire cooked, I came beneath her teeth,

Twice, thrice she bit (memordit).

9.5 Also Publius Nigidius in his 2nd book On Animals: ‘As when a serpent bites (memordit) one, a hen is split and placed upon the wound.’ 9.6 Likewise Plautus in the Aulularia:

How he the man did fleece (admemordit).

9.7 But Plautus again, in the Trigemini, said neither praememordisse nor praemomordisse, but praemorsisse, in the following line:

Had I not fled into your midst,

Methinks he’d bitten me (praemorsisset).

9.8 Atta too in the Conciliatrix says:

A bear, he says, bit him (memordisse).

9.9 Valerius Antias too, in the 45th book of his Annals, has left on record peposci, not poposci in this passage: ‘Finally Licinius, tribune of the commons, charged him with high treason and asked (peposcit) from the praetor Marcus Marcius a day for holding the comitia.’

9.10 In the same way Atta in the Aedilicia says:

But he will be afraid, if I do prick him (pepugero).

9.11 Probus has noted that Aelius Tubero also, in his work dedicated to Gaius Ippius, wrote occecurrit, and he has quoted him as follows:​ ‘If the general form should present itself (occecurrerit).’ 9.12 Probus also observed that Valerius Antias in the 22nd book of his Histories wrote speponderant, and he quotes his words as follows:​ ‘Tiberius Gracchus, who had been quaestor to Gaius Mancinus in Spain, and the others who had guaranteed (speponderant) peace.’

9.13 Now the explanation of these forms might seem to be this: since the Greeks in one form of the past tense, which they call παρακείμενον, or ‘perfect’, commonly change the second letter of the verb to e, as φράφω γέγραφα, ποιῶ πεποίηκα, λαλῶ λελάληκα, κρατῶ κεκράτηκα, λούω λέλουκα, so accordingly mordeo makes memordi, 9.14 posco peposci, tendo tetendi, tango tetigi, pungo pepugi, curro cecurri, tollo tetuli, and spondeo spepondi. 9.15 Thus Marcus Tullius​ and Gaius Caesar used mordeo memordi, pungo pepugi, spondeo spepondi. I find besides that from the verb scindo in the same way was made, not sciderat, but sciciderat.”

14.1 Both in verse and in prose there are 3 approved styles, which the Greeks call χαρακτῆρες and to which they have given the names of ἁδρός, ἰσχνός and μέσος. 14.2 We also call the one which I put 1st ‘grand’, the 2nd ‘plain’, and the 3rd ‘middle’.”

14.4 To each of these excellent styles there are related an equal number of faulty ones, arising from unsuccessful attempts to imitate their manner and character.”

14.6 But true and genuine Latin examples of 3 styles are said by Marcus Varro​ to be: Pacuvius of the grand style, Lucilius of the plain, and Terence of the middle. 14.7 But in early days these same 3 styles of speaking were exemplified in 3 men by Homer: the grand and rich in Ulysses, the elegant and restrained in Menelaus, the middle and moderate in Nestor.

14.8 This threefold variety is also to be observed in the 3 philosophers whom the Athenians sent as envoys to the senate at Rome, to persuade the senators to remit the fine which they had imposed upon the Athenians because of the sack of Oropos;​ and the fine amounted to nearly 500 talents. 14.9 The philosophers in question were Carneades of the Academy, Diogenes the Stoic, and Critolaus the Peripatetic….”

17.1 I inquired at Rome of a certain grammarian who had the highest repute as a teacher, not indeed for the sake of trying or testing him, but rather from an eager desire for knowledge, what obnoxius meant and what was the origin and the history of the word. 17.2… ‘Truly a difficult question is this that you ask, one demanding very many sleepless nights of investigation! 17.3 Who, pray, is so ignorant of the Latin tongue as not to know that one is called obnoxius who can be inconvenienced or injured by another, to whom he is said to be obnoxius because the other is conscious of his noxa, that is to say, of his guilt? Why not rather,’ said he, ‘drop these trifles and put questions worthy of study and discussion?’

17.4… ‘If, most learned sir, I need to learn and to know other things that are more abstruse and more important, when the occasion arises I shall inquire and learn them from you; but inasmuch as I have often used the word obnoxius without knowing what I was saying, I have learned from you and am now beginning to understand what not I alone, as you seem to think, was ignorant of; for as a matter of fact, Plautus too, though a man of the first rank in his use of the Latin language and in elegance of diction, did not know the meaning of obnoxius. For there is a passage of his in the Stichus which reads as follows:

By heaven! I now am utterly undone,

Not only partly so (non obnoxie).

This does not in the least agree with what you have taught me; for Plautus contrasted plane and obnoxie as 2 opposites, which is far removed from your meaning.’

17.5 But that grammarian retorted foolishly enough, as if obnoxius and obnoxie differed, not merely in form, but in their substance and meaning: ‘I gave a definition of obnoxius, not obnoxie.’

17.8 ‘…but explain to me this example, which is certainly more recent and more familiar. For the following lines of Virgil’s are very well known:

For now the stars’ bright sheen is seen undimmed.

The rising Moon owes naught (nec . . . obnoxia) to brother’s rays;

17.9 but you say that it means <conscious of her guilt>. In another place too Virgil uses this word with a meaning different from yours, in these lines:

What joy the fields to view

That owe no debt (non obnoxia) to hoe or care of man. …’

17.11 But our grammarian, with open mouth as if in a dream, said: ‘Just now I have no time to spare. When I have leisure, come to see me and learn what Virgil, Plautus, Sallust and Ennius meant by that word.’

(*) “The interrogative quem would be stressed (have ‘an acute accent’), while the relative quem would not (i.e., would have a grave accent).”

(*) “An enthymeme in logic was an argument consisting of 2 propositions, the antecedent and its consequence.”

O’Connor, Chapters in the History of Actors and Acting in Ancient Greece (Princeton dissertation), 1908.

(*) “Gellius is perhaps thinking of such exceptions as éxinde and súbinde, in which however the penult is not long by nature, but by position.”

(*) “The translation is ambiguous and misleading. It would have been better to write: five senses, called by the Greeks αἰσθήσεις, to living beings; sight, hearing, taste, touch and smell.”

BOOK VII

1.6 Against these criticisms Chrysippus argues at length, subtilely and cleverly, but the purport of all that he has written on that subject is about this: 1.7 ‘Although it is a fact,’ he says, ‘that all things are subject to an inevitable and fundamental law and are closely linked to fate, yet the peculiar properties of our minds are subject to fate only according to their individuality and quality….’

1.13 Therefore he says that wicked, slothful, sinful and reckless men ought not to be endured or listened to, who, when they are caught fast in guilt and sin, take refuge in the inevitable nature of fate, as if in the asylum of some shrine, declaring that their outrageous actions must be charged, not to their own heedlessness, but to fate.”

10.1 The philosopher Taurus, a celebrated Platonist of my time, used to urge the study of philosophy by many other good and wholesome examples and in particular stimulated the minds of the young by what he said that Euclides the Socratic used to do. 10.2 ‘The Athenians,’ said he, ‘had provided in one of their decrees that any citizen of Megara who should be found to have set foot in Athens should for that suffer death; 10.3 so great,’ says he, ‘was the hatred of the neighbouring men of Megara with which the Athenians were inflamed. 10.4 Then Euclides, who was from that very town of Megara and before the passage of that decree had been accustomed to come to Athens and to listen to Socrates, after the enactment of that measure, at nightfall, as darkness was coming on, clad in a woman’s long tunic, wrapped in a parti-coloured mantle, and with veiled head, used to walk from his home in Megara to Athens, to visit Socrates, in order that he might at least for some part of the night share in the master’s teaching and discourse. And just before dawn he went back again, a distance of somewhat over twenty miles, disguised in that same garb. 10.5 But nowadays,’ said Taurus, ‘we may see the philosophers themselves running to the doors of rich young men, to give them instruction, and there they sit and wait until nearly noonday, for their pupils to sleep off all last night’s wine.’

17.1 The tyrant Pisistratus is said to have been the first to establish at Athens a public library of books relating to the liberal arts. Then the Athenians themselves added to this collection with considerable diligence and care; but later Xerxes, when he got possession of Athens and burned the entire city except the citadel,​ removed that whole collection of books and carried them off to Persia. 17.2 Finally, a long time afterwards, king Seleucus, who was surnamed Nicator, had all those books taken back to Athens.

17.3 At a later time an enormous quantity of books, nearly 700,000, was either acquired or written​ in Egypt under the kings known as Ptolemies; but these were all burned during the sack of the city in our 1st war with Alexandria,​ not intentionally or by anyone’s order, but accidentally by the auxiliary soldiers.”

(*) “In 48 B.C. By no means all of the Alexandrian Library was destroyed at that time, and the losses were made good, at least in part, by Antony in 41 B.C. A part of the library was burned under Aurelian, in A.D. 272, and the destruction seems to have been completed in 391.”

BOOK VIII

(*) “The sky on columns of dust upborne, Aen. XII.407, where the poet [Virgil] is describing the effect of an advancing troop of cavalry.”

(*) “The breast with thorns is filled, Lucil. 213, Marx.”

BOOK IX

4.6 …Further, that it was handed down by tradition that in a distant land called Albania men are born whose hair turns white in childhood and who see better by night than in the daytime….

4.7 In those same books I ran upon this statemet too, which I later read also in the 7th book of the Natural History of Plinius Secundus, that in the land of Africa there are families of persons who work spells by voice and tongue; 4.8 for if they should chance to have bestowed extravagant praise upon beautiful trees, plentiful crops, charming children, fine horses, flocks that are well fed and in good condition, suddenly, for no other cause than this, all these would die…. and that those persons themselves, both men and women, who possess this power of harmful gaze, have two pupils in each eye. 4.9 Also that in the mountains of the land of India there are men who have the heads of dogs, and bark, and that they feed upon birds and wild animals which they have taken in the chase. That in the remotest lands of the east too there are other marvellous men called monocoli, or ‘one-legged’, who run by hopping with their single leg and are of a most lively swiftness.​…”

4.11 And that not far from these people is the land of Pygmies, the tallest of whom are not more than 2¼ feet in height.

4.12 These and many other stories of the kind I read; but when writing them down, I was seized with disgust for such worthless writings, which contribute nothing to the enrichment or profit of life.”

4.15 [Plinius Secundus] says that the change of women into men is not a fiction.” E isso basta para que Gellius acredite! Com efeito, Plínio o Velho (o Jovem, seu sobrinho, talvez seja chamado Plinius Tertius) podia ser enfileirado entre esses autores anedóticos superestimados de nossa cultura (como Montaigne e Plutarco), não obstante consegue ser ao menos engraçado, e sua História Natural contém muito folclore misturado com informações verídicas ou ao menos parcialmente verídicas.

4.16 Pliny also wrote this in the same book:​ ‘There are persons who from birth are bisexual, whom we call <hermaphrodites>; they were formerly termed androgyni and regarded as prodigies, but now are instruments of pleasure.’” Prostituídos ao nascer? Que horror…

9.1 Whenever striking expressions from the Greek poets are to be translated and imitated, they say that we should not always strive to render every single word with exact literalness. 9.2 For many things lose their charm if they are transplanted too forcibly — unwillingly, as it were, and reluctantly.​ 9.3 Virgil therefore showed skill and good judgment in omitting some things and rendering others, when he was dealing with passages of Homer or Hesiod or Apollonius or Parthenius or Callimachus or Theocritus, or some other poet.”

9.7…

O Tityrus, well-belovéd, feed my goats,

And lead them to the front, good Tityrus;

But ‘ware yon buck-goat yellow, lest he butt.

9.11 Till I return — not long — feed thou my goats;

Then, Tityrus, give them a drink, but as you go,

Avoid the buck-goat’s horn — the fellow butts!

12.1 As the adjective formidulosus may be used both of one who fears and of one who is feared, invidiosus of one who envies and of one who is envied, suspiciosus of one who suspects and of one who is suspected, ambitiosus of one who courts favour and one who is courted, gratiosus also of one who gives, and of one who receives, thanks, laboriosus of one who toils and of one who causes toil — as many other words of this kind are used in both ways, so infestus too has a double meaning. 12.2 For he is called infestus who inflicts injury on anyone, and on the other hand he who is threatened with injury from another source is also said to be infestus.”

12.13 Metus also and iniuria, and some other words of the kind, may be used in this double sense; for metus hostium, ‘fear of the enemy’, is a correct expression both when the enemy fear and when they are feared.”

12.18 Nescius also is used as well of one who is unknown as of one who does not know; 12.19 but its use in the sense of one who does not know is common, while it is rarely used of that which is unknown. 12.20 Ignarus has the same double application, not only to one who is ignorant, but also to one who is not known.”

(*) “Pertempto means ‘try thoroughly’, hence ‘affect deeply’. Probus must have taken per in the sense of ‘over’, ‘on the surface’, thus giving pertempto a meaning of which no example exists.”

BOOK X

5.1 Publius Nigidius, in the 29th book of his Commentaries,​ declares that avarus is not a simple word, but is compounded of 2 parts: ‘For that man,’ he says, ‘is called avarus, or <covetous>, who is avidus aeris, or <eager for money>; but in the compound the letter e is lost.’ 5.2 He also says that a man is called by the compound term locuples, or ‘rich’ when he holds pleraque loca, that is to say, ‘many possessions.’

5.3 But his statement about locuples is the stronger and more probable. As to avarus there is doubt; for why may it not seem to be derived from one single word, namely aveo, and formed in the same way as amarus, about which there is general agreement that it is not a compound?” [A semântica parece depor a favor de amarus como raiz, se ainda vale algo perante a sintaxe!]

11.1 Mature in present usage signifies ‘hastily’ and ‘quickly’, contrary to the true force of the word; for mature means quite a different thing. 11.2 Therefore Publius Nigidius, a man eminent in the pursuit of all the liberal arts, says: Mature means neither <too soon> nor <too late>, but something between the two and intermediate.’

11.5 …‘make haste slowly’

11.6 Virgil also, to one who is observant, has skilfully distinguished the 2 words properare and maturare as clearly opposite, in these verses:

Whenever winter’s rains the hind confine,

Much is there that at leisure may be done (maturare),

Which in fair weather he must hurry on (properanda).” [seria prosperare na forma antiga? verificar – parece que não: properare está mais para ‘ser proativo’, dinâmico, não necessariamente prosperando no processo! pro+operare – agir, se bem ou mal, não há qualquer valoração.]

Pliny the Elder é chamado de Plinius Secundos pelos latinos (como vimos mais acima). Parece que Plínio o Jovem é apenas o terceiro! A confusão sobre “Plinius Secundus” me fez crer por algumas semanas que o sobrinho de Plínio o Velho veio a continuar sua História Natural ou então escrever uma outra!…

12.1 Pliny the Elder, in the 28th book of his Natural History asserts​ that there is a book of that most famous philosopher Democritus On the Power and Nature of the Chameleon, and that he had read it; and then he transmits to us many foolish and intolerable absurdities, alleging that they were written by Democritus. Of these unwillingly, since they disgust me, I recall a few, as follows: 12.2 that the hawk, the swiftest of all birds, if it chance to fly over a chameleon which is crawling on the ground, is dragged down and falls through some force to the earth, and offers and gives itself up of its own accord to be torn to pieces by the other birds. 12.3 Another statement too is past human belief, namely, that if the head and neck of the chameleon be burned by means of the wood which is called oak, rain and thunder are suddenly produced, and that this same thing is experienced if the liver of that animal is burned upon the roof of a house. 12.4 There is also another story, which by heaven! I hesitated about putting down, so preposterous is it; but I have made it a rule that we ought to speak our mind about the fallacious seduction of marvels of that kind, by which the keenest minds are often deceived and led to their ruin, and in particular those which are especially eager for knowledge. But I return to Pliny.

12.5 He says​ that the left foot of the chameleon is roasted with an iron heated in the fire, along with an herb called by the same name, ‘chameleon’; both are mixed in an ointment, formed into a paste, and put in a wooden vessel. He who carries the vessel, even if he go openly amid a throng, can be seen by no one.”

12.7 the same is true of what the same Pliny, in his 10th book, asserts that Democritus wrote; namely, that there were certain birds with a language of their own, and that by mixing the blood of those birds a serpent was produced; that whoso ate it would understand the language of birds and their conversation.

12.8 Many fictions of this kind seem to have been attached to the name of Democritus by ignorant men, who sheltered themselves under his reputation and authority.”

17.1 It is written in the records of Grecian story that the philosopher Democritus, a man worthy of reverence beyond all others and of the highest authority, of his own accord deprived himself of eye-sight, because he believed that the thoughts and meditations of his mind in examining nature’s laws would be more vivid and exact, if he should free them from the allurements of sight and the distractions offered by the eyes. 17.2 This act of his, and the manner too in which he easily blinded himself by a most ingenious device, the poet Laberius has described, in a farce called The Ropemaker, in very elegant and finished verses; but he has imagined another reason for voluntary blindness and applied it with no little neatness to his own subject.

17.3 For the character who speaks these lines in Laberius is a rich and stingy miser, lamenting in vigorous terms the excessive extravagance and dissipation of his young son. 17.4 These are the verses of Laberius:

Democritus, Abdera’s scientist,

Set up a shield to face Hyperion’s rise,

That sight he might destroy by blaze of brass,

Thus by the sun’s rays he destroyed his eyes,

Lest he should see bad citizens’ good luck;

So I with blaze and splendour of my gold

Would render sightless my concluding years,

Lest I should see my spendthrift son’s good luck.”

25.1 Once upon a time, when I was riding in a carriage, to keep my mind from being dull and unoccupied and a prey to worthless trifles, it chanced to occur to me to try to recall the names of weapons, darts and swords which are found in the early histories, and also the various kinds of boats and their names. 25.2 Those, then, of the former that came to mind at the time are the following: spear, pike, fire-pike (3), half-pike, iron bolt, Gallic spear, lance, hunting-darts (8), javelins, long bolts (10), barbed-javelins, German spears, thonged-javelin (13), Gallic bolt, broadswords (15), poisoned arrows, Illyrian hunting-spears (17), cimeters (18), darts (19), swords, daggers, broadswords (22=15), double-edged swords, small-swords (24), poniards, cleavers (26).

25.3 Of the lingula, or ‘little tongue’, since it is less common, I think I ought to say that the ancients applied that term to an oblong small-sword, made in the form of a tongue; it is mentioned by Naevius in his tragedy Hesione. I quote the line:

Pray let me seem to please you with my tongue,

But with my little tongue (lingula).

25.4 The rumpia too is a kind of weapon of the Thracian people, and the word occurs in the 14th book of the Annals of Quintus Ennius.

25.5 The names of ships which I recalled at the time are these: merchant-ships, cargo-carriers, skiffs (3), warships, cavalry-transports, cutters, fast cruisers, or, as the Greeks call them, κέλητες, barques, smacks, sailing-skiffs, light galleys, which the Greeks call… ἐπακτρίδες, scouting-boats, galliots, tenders, flat-boats, vetutiae moediae, yachts, pinnaces, long-galliots, scullers’ boats, caupuls [em desuso], arks, fair-weather craft, pinks, lighters, spy-boats.”

27.1 It is stated in ancient records that the strength, the spirit and the numbers of the Roman and the Carthaginian people were once equal. 27.2 And this opinion was not without foundation. With other nations the contest was for the independence of one or the other state, with the Carthaginians it was for the rule of the world.”

28.1 Tubero, in the 1st book of his History,​ has written that King Servius Tullius, when he divided the Roman people into those 5 classes of older and younger men for the purpose of making the enrolment, regarded as pueri, or ‘boys’, those who were less than 17 years old; then, from the 17th year, when they were thought to be fit for service, he enrolled them as soldiers, calling them up to the age of 46 iuniores or ‘younger men’, and beyond that age, seniores, or ‘elders.’”

29.1 The particle atque is said by the grammarians to be a copulative conjunction. And as a matter of fact, it very often joins and connects words; but sometimes it has certain other powers, which are not sufficiently observed, except by those engaged in a diligent examination of the early literature. 29.2 For it has the force of an adverb when we say ‘I have acted otherwise than (atque) you,’ for it is equivalent to aliter quam tu; and if it is doubled, it amplifies and emphasizes a statement, as we note in the Annals of Quintus Ennius, unless my memory of this verse is at fault:

And quickly (atque atque) to the walls the Roman manhood came.​

29.3 The opposite of this meaning is expressed by deque, also found in the early writers.

29.4 Atque is said to have been used besides for another adverb also, namely statim,…”

(*) “The derivation of amarus is uncertain; it is perhaps connected with Greek ὠμός, ‘raw’ (cf. crudus and crudelis). Sanscrit âmas.” Amarus pater

(*) “Classis originally meant one of the classes into which the citizens were divided by the Servian constitution, then, collectively, the army composed of the classes.”

(*) “The term mausoleum was applied by the Romans to large and magnificent tombs such as the mausoleum of Augustus and that of Hadrian.”

(*) “Many of these names, both of weapons and ships, are most uncertain; for some no exact equivalent can be found.”

BOOK XI

5.1 Those whom we call the Pyrronian philosophers are designated by the Greek name σκεπτικοί, or ‘sceptics’, 5.2 which means about the same as ‘inquirers’ and ‘investigators’. 5.3 For they decide nothing and determine nothing, but are always engaged in inquiring and considering what there is in all nature concerning which it is possible to decide and determine. 5.4 And moreover they believe that they do not see or hear anything clearly, but that they undergo and experience something like seeing and hearing; but they are in doubt as of that nature and character of those very things which cause them those experiences, and they deliberate about them; and they declare that in everything assurance and absolute truth seem so beyond our grasp, owing to the mingling and confusing of the indications of truth and falsehood, that any man who is not rash and precipitate in his judgment ought to use the language which they say was used by Pyrro, the founder of that philosophy: ‘Does not this matter stand so, rather than so, or is it neither?’ For they deny that proofs of anything and its real qualities can be known and understood, and they try in many ways to point this out and demonstrate it. 5.5 On this subject Favorinus too with great keenness and subtlety has composed 10 books, which he entitled Πυρρωνεῖοι Τρόποι, or The Pyrronian Principles.” 10 livros é DEMAIS para qualquer coisa, principalmente para o ceticismo (contra ou a favor, ou cético quanto a ele [ironia]).

5.6 It is besides a question of long standing, which has been discussed by many Greek writers, whether the Pyrronian and Academic philosophers differ at all, and to what extent. For both are called ‘sceptics, inquirers and doubters’, since both affirm nothing and believe that nothing is understood. But they say that appearances, which they call φαντασίαι, are produced from all objects, not according to the nature of the objects themselves, but according to the condition of mind or body of those to whom these appearances come. 5.7 Therefore they call absolutely all things that affect men’s sense τὰ πρός τι. This expression means that there is nothing at all that is self-dependent or which has its own power and nature, but that absolutely all things have ‘reference to something else’ and seem to be such as their appearance is while they are seen, and such as they are formed by our senses, to whom they come, not by the things themselves, from which they have proceeded. 5.8 But although the Pyrronians and the Academics express themselves very much alike about these matters, yet they are thought to differ from each other both in certain other respects and especially for this reason — because the Academics do, as it were, ‘comprehend’ the very fact that nothing can be comprehended, while the Pyrronians assert that not even that can by any means be regarded as true, because nothing is regarded as true.

6.1 In our early writings neither do Roman women swear by Hercules nor the men by Castor. 6.2 But why the women did not swear by Hercules is evident, since they abstain from sacrificing to Hercules. 6.3 On the other hand, why the men did not name Castor in oaths is not easy to say. Nowhere, then, is it possible to find an instance, among good writers, either of a woman saying ‘by Hercules’ or a man, ‘by Castor’; 6.4 but edepol, which is an oath by Pollux, is common to both man and woman. 6.5 Marcus Varro, however, asserts that the earliest men were wont to swear neither by Castor nor by Pollux, but that this oath was used by women alone and was taken from the Eleusinian initiations; 6.6 that gradually, however, through ignorance of ancient usage, men began to say edepol, and thus it became a customary expression; but that the use of ‘by Castor’ by a man appears in no ancient writing.”

(*) “according to Plin. N.H. VII.129, the celebrated Roman actor Roscius made 500,000 sesterces yearly.”

BOOK XII

(*) “Besides Caligula, who called Seneca’s essays ‘mere declamation exercises’ and his style ‘sand without lime’ (Suet. Calig. LIII), there were other critics of Seneca in his own day, as well as in the following Flavian epoch.”

(*) “Saltem or saltim is the accusative of a noun (cf. partim, etc.) derived by some from the root of sal-vus and sal-us; by others from that of sal-io; Walde, Lat. Etym. Wörterb. s.v. accepts Warren’s derivation from si alitem (formed from item), meaning ‘if otherwise’.”

BOOK XIII

(*) “Aristotle tells us that the lioness gives birth to young every year, usually 2, at most 6, sometimes only one. The current idea that the womb is discharged with the young is absurd; it arose from the fact that lions are rare and that inventor of the story did not know the real reason, which is that their habitat is of limited extent. The lionesses in Syria give birth 5 times, producing at first 5 cubs, then one less at each successive birth.”

(*) “It is of no use for one to know how to sing, unless he proves that he knows how by singing in public.”

Livros XIV ao XX apenas em latim (edição Rolfe-Thayer).

* * *

Consegui acesso ao texto integral na seqüência; agora, no entanto, procederemos sem numeração exata.

BOOK XIV

I “Against those who call themselves ‘Chaldaeans’ or ‘astrologers’, and profess from the movements and position of the stars to be able to read the future, I once at Rome heard the philosopher Favorinus discourse in Greek in admirable and brilliant language. But whether it was for the purpose of exercising, not vaunting, his talent, or because he seriously and sincerely believed what he said, I am unable to tell; but I promptly jotted down the heads of the topics and of the arguments which he used, so far as I could recall them immediately after leaving the meeting, and they were about to this effect: That this science of the Chaldaeans was not of so great antiquity as they would have it appear; that the founders and authors of it were not those whom they themselves name, but that tricks and delusions of that kind were devised by jugglers and men who made a living and profit from their lies. And since they saw that some terrestrial phenomena known to men were caused by the influence and control of the heavenly bodies, as for example the ocean, as though a companion of the moon, grows old and resumes its youth along with her — from this, forsooth, they derived an argument for persuading us to believe that all human affairs, both the greatest and the least, as though bound to the stars and constellations, are influenced and governed by them. But Favorinus said that it was utterly foolish and absurd to suppose, because the tide of the ocean corresponds with the course of the moon, that a suit at law which one happens to have about an aqueduct with his neighbours, or with the man next door about a party-wall, is also bound to heaven as if by a kind of chain and is decided by the stars. But even if by some divine power and purpose this could happen, yet he thought that it could by no means be grasped and understood in such a brief and scant span of life as ours by any human intellect, but he believed that some few things were conjectured παχυμερέστερον, (to use his own term), that is, ‘somewhat roughly’, with no sure foundation of knowledge, but in a loose, random and arbitrary manner, just as when we look at objects far away with eyes blinded by their remoteness from us.” Favorino foi realmente precursor neste raciocínio: reconhece a gravidade, mas apenas aquela que faria sentido: corpos imensos atuando sobre objetos relevantes!

For the greatest difference between men and gods was removed, if man also had the power of foreknowing all future events. Furthermore, he thought that even the observation of the stars and constellations, which they declared to be the foundation of their knowledge, was by no means a matter of certainty.” Exatamente. Porque ainda não havia telescópios, não tínhamos idéia da real dimensão e distância dos astros!

For if the original Chaldaeans,’ said he, ‘who dwelt in the open plains, watched the movements and orbits of the stars their separations and conjunctions, and observed their effects, let this art continue to be practised, but let it be only under the same inclination of the heavens as that under which the Chaldaeans then were. For the system of observation of the Chaldaeans cannot remain valid, if anyone should wish to apply it to different regions of the sky.’

For who does not see,’ said he, ‘how great is the diversity of the zones and circles of the heavens caused by the inclination and convexity of the earth? Why then should not those same stars, by which they maintain that all human and divine affairs are affected, just as they do not everywhere arouse cold and heat, but change and vary the weather, at the same time causing calm in one place and storm in another — why should they not, I say, produce one series of affairs and events in the land of the Chaldaeans, another among the Gaetulians, another on the Danube, and still another on the Nile?…’ Besides, he expressed his surprise that anyone considered it a certainty that those stars which they say were observed by the Chaldaeans and Babylonians, or by the Egyptians, which many call erraticae, or ‘wandering’, but Nigidius called errones, or ‘the wanderers’, are not more numerous than is commonly assumed; for he thought it might possibly be the case that there were some other planets [todo e qualquer corpo celeste, estrela, cometa, planeta] of equal power, without which a correct and final observation could not be completed, but that men could not see them because of their remarkable brilliance or altitude. ‘For’, said he, ‘some stars are visible from certain lands and are known to the men of those lands; but those same stars are not visible from every other land and are wholly unknown to other men. And granting’, said he, ‘both that only these stars ought to be observed, and that too from one part of the earth, what possible end was there to such observation, and what periods of time seemed sufficient for understanding what the conjunction or the orbits or the transits of the stars foretold? For if an observation was made in the beginning in such a manner that it was calculated under what aspect, arrangement and position of the stars anyone was born, and if thereafter his fortune from the beginning of his life, his character, his disposition, the circumstances of his affairs and activities, and finally also the end of his life were noted, and all these things as they had actually happened were committed to writing, and long afterwards, when the same stars were in the same aspect and position, it was supposed that those same things would happen to others who had been born at that same time; if the first observations were made in that way,’ said he, ‘and from such observations a kind of science was formed, it can by no means be a success. For let them tell me in how many years, pray, or rather in how many ages, the cycle of the observations could be completed.’”

Ciente de um modelo teórico de eterno retorno ou grande ano.

For he said that it was agreed among astrologers that those stars which they call ‘wandering’, which are supposed to determine the fate of all things, beginning their course together, return to the same place from which they set out only after an innumerable and almost infinite number of years, so that there could be no continuity of observation, and no literary record could endure for so long an epoch.” A isso os charlatães modernos redargüirão: mas descobrimos o sistema solar, os anos dos planetas em torno de nosso – insignificante no plano cósmico, é verdade! – sol, – mas ainda – o astro-rei sobre todos os timoratos indivíduos do Planeta Água!

And he thought that this point also ought to be taken into consideration, that one constellation presided at the time when a man was first conceived in his mother’s womb, and another one 10 months later when he came into the world, and he asked how it was consistent for a different indication to be made about the same person, if, as they themselves thought, a different position and order of the same stars gave different fortunes. But also at the time of marriage, from which children were expected, and at the very union of the husband and wife, he said that it ought to be indicated by a fixed and inevitable position of the stars, with what character and fortune men would be born; and, indeed, long before that, when the father and mother were themselves born, it ought to be foretold even then from their horoscope what offspring they would produce; and far, far back of that, even to infinity, so that, if that science rested on any foundation of truth, 100 years ago, or rather at the beginning of heaven and earth, and then on in an unbroken series of predictions as long as generation followed generation, those stars ought to have foretold what character and fortune anyone would have who is born today.”

Moreover, he thought that the most intolerable thing was their belief that not only occurrences and events of an external nature, but even men’s very deliberations, their purposes, their various pleasures, their likes and dislikes, the chance and sudden attractions and aversions of their feelings on trifling matters, were excited and influenced from heaven above; for example, if you happened to wish to go to the baths, and then should change your mind, and again should decide to go, that all this happens, not from some shifting and variable state of mind, but from a fateful ebb and flow of the planets. Thus men would clearly be seen to be, not λογικὰ ζῶα or ‘reasoning beings’, as they are called, but a species of ludicrous and ridiculous puppets, if it be true that they do nothing of their own volition or their own will, but are led and driven by the stars. ‘And if’, said he, ‘they affirm that it could have been foretold whether king Pyrrhus or Manius Curius was to be victorious in the battle, why, pray, do they not dare also to predict which of the players with dice or counters on a board will win?…’

and are unimportant things more difficult to understand than the important?…

Then, finally, he asked what answer could be made to this argument, that human beings of both sexes, of all ages, born into the world under different positions of the stars and in regions widely separated, nevertheless sometimes all perished together by the same kind of death and at the same moment, either from an earthquake, or a falling building, or the sack of a town, or the wreck of the same ship.”

“‘But if’, he said, ‘they answer that even in the life and death of men who are born at different times certain events may happen which are alike and similar, through some similar conjunction of the stars at a later time, why may not sometimes everything become equal, so that through such agreement and similarity of the stars many a Socrates and Antisthenes and Plato may appear, equal in birth, in person, in talent, in character, in their whole life and in their death?’Favorino realmente foi fundo! E nem precisava…

if the time, the manner and the cause of men’s life and death, and of all human affairs, were in heaven and with the stars, what would they say of flies, worms, sea urchins, and many other minute animals of land and sea? Were they too born and destroyed under the same laws as men? so that to frogs also and gnats either the same fates are assigned at birth by the movements of the constellations, or, if they do not believe that, there seemed to be no reason why that power of the stars should be effective with men and ineffectual with the other animals.”

These remarks I have touched upon in a dry, unadorned, and almost jejune style. But Favorinus, such was the man’s talent, and such is at once the copiousness and the charm of Greek eloquence, delivered them at greater length and with more charm, brilliance and readiness, and from time to time he warned us to take care lest in any way those sycophants should worm their way into our confidence by sometimes seeming to stumble upon, and give utterance to, something true.”

And after making many attempts they either happen suddenly on the truth without knowing it, or led by the great credulity of those who consult them, they get hold by cunning of something true, and therefore obviously find it easier to come somewhere near the truth in past events than in those to come….

They predict, either adverse or prosperous events. If they foretell prosperity and deceive you, you will be made wretched by vain expectations; if they foretell adversity and lie, you will be made wretched by useless fears. But if they predict truly and the events are unhappy, you will thereby be made wretched by anticipation, before you are fated to be so; if on the contrary they promise prosperity and it comes to pass, then there will clearly be 2 disadvantages: the anticipation of your hopes will wear you out with suspense, and hope will in advance have reaped the fruit of your approaching happiness. Therefore there is every reason why you should not resort to men of that kind, who profess knowledge of the future.” Perfeito.

VI “A friend of mine, a man not without fame as a student of literature, who had passed a great part of his life among books, said to me: ‘I should like to aid and adorn your Nights, at the same time presenting me with a book of great bulk, overflowing, as he himself put it, with learning of every kind. He said that he had compiled it as the result of wide, varied and abstruse reading, and he invited me to take from it as much as I liked and thought worthy of record. I took the book eagerly and gladly, as if I had got possession of the horn of plenty [cornucópia], and shut myself up in order to read it without interruption. But what was written there was, by Jove! merely a list of curiosities:” Que coisa, ele era igual a você, Aulo!

why Telemachus did not touch Pisistratus, who was lying beside him, with his hand, but awakened him by a kick…

It also contained the names of the companions of Ulysses who were seized and torn to pieces by Scylla;” Matéria interessante!

and besides what regions and cities had had a change of name, as Boeotia was formerly called Aonia, Egypt Aeria, Crete by the same name Aeria, Attica Acte, Corinth Ephyre, Macedonia Emathia, Thessaly Haemonia, Tyre Sarra, Thrace Sithonia, Paestum Poseidonia.”

BOOK XV

II “For he [Plato] thought that by the proper and moderate relaxation of drinking the mind was refreshed and renewed for resuming the duties of sobriety, and that men were gradually rendered happier and became readier to repeat their efforts. At the same time, if there were deep in their hearts any errors of inclination or desire, which a kind of reverential shame concealed, he thought that by the frankness engendered by wine all these were disclosed without great danger and became more amenable to correction and cure.”

that exercises of this kind for the purpose of resisting the violence of wine, are not to be avoided and shunned, and that no one ever appeared to be altogether self-restrained and temperate whose life and habits had not been tested amid the very dangers of error and in the midst of the enticements of pleasures. For when all the license and attractions of banquets are unknown, and a man is wholly unfamiliar with them, if haply inclination has led him, or chance has induced him, or necessity has compelled him, to take part in pleasures of that kind, then he is as a rule seduced and taken captive, his mind and soul fail to meet the test, but give way, as if attacked by some strange power. Therefore he thought that we ought to meet the issue and contend hand to hand, as in a kind of battle, with pleasure and indulgence in wine, in order that we may not be safe against them by flight or absence, but that by vigour of spirit, by presence of mind, and by moderate use, we may preserve our temperance and self-restraint, and at the same time by warming and refreshing the mind we may free it of whatever frigid austerity or dull bashfulness it may contain.”

XX “He [Euripides] is said to have had an exceeding antipathy towards almost all women, either because he had a natural disinclination to their society, or because he had had 2 wives at the same time (since that was permitted by a decree passed by the Athenians) and they had made wedlock hateful to him. Aristophanes also notices his antipathy to women in the first edition of the Thesmophoriazousae

BOOK XVI

X “Those of the Roman commons who were humblest and of smallest means, and who reported no more than 1500 asses at the census, were called proletarii, but those who were rated as having no property at all, or next to none, were termed capite censi, or ‘counted by head.’ And the lowest rating of the capite censi was 375 asses. But since property and money were regarded as a hostage and pledge of loyalty to the State, and since there was in them a kind of guarantee and assurance of patriotism, neither the proletarii nor the capite censi were enrolled as soldiers except in some time of extraordinary disorder, because they had little or no property and money.”

in times of danger to the State, when there was a scarcity of men of military age, they [proletarii] were enrolled for hasty service, and arms were furnished them at public expense.”

Adsidaus in the Twelve Tables is used of one who is rich and well to do, either because he contributed ‘asses’ (that is, money) when the exigencies of the State required it, or from his ‘assiduity’ in making contributions according to the amount of his property.”

XVIII Optics effect many surprising things, such as the appearance in one mirror of several images of the same thing; also that a mirror placed in a certain position shows no image, but when moved to another spot gives reflections; also that if you look straight into a mirror, your reflection is such that your head appears below and your feet uppermost. This science also gives the reasons for optical illusions, such as the magnifying of objects seen in the water, and the small size of those that are remote from the eye.”

Harmony, on the other hand, measures the length and pitch of sounds. The measure of the length of a tone is called ῥυθμός, or rhythm of its pitch, μέλος, or ‘melody.’ There is also another variety of Harmony which is called μετρική, or ‘Metric,’ by which the combination of long and short syllables, and those which are neither long nor short, and the verse measure according to the principles of geometry are examined with the aid of the ears. ‘But these things,’ says Marcus Varro, ‘we either do not learn at all, or we leave off before we know why they ought to be learned. But the pleasure,’ he says, ‘and the advantage of such sciences appear in their later study, when they have been completely mastered; but in their mere elements they seem foolish and unattractive.’

BOOKS XVII-XVIII-XIX-XX

(…) Nada de substancial.

GLOSSÁRIO INGLÊS:

cleaver: cutelo, machadinha, “A heavy, broad-bladed knife or hatchet used especially by butchers.”

gormandize: empanturrar-se

ictus: icto, acento agudo gramatical; ataque súbito (Med.).

pander: cafetão, proxeneta; bajulador.

pink: tipo de navio com uma grande divisória no meio

quack: charlatão

scimitar = scimiter: “A saber with a much curved blade having the edge on the convex side – in use among Mohammedans, esp., the Arabs and Persians.” = CIMITARRA, etim.: do italiano scimitarra.

sculler: remador

scullers’ boat: esquife

sinew: força, energia; tendão.

smack: barco de pesca

sterling: excelente

throng: multidão, aglomeração, ralé

Para o glossário latino, ver https://seclusao.art.blog/2023/05/07/superglossario-latim/ (constantemente atualizado)

QUIMERA – Suriman Carreira (ed. Clube de Autores) – recenseado.

INSPIRADOS X APÓCRIFOS: “Nos primórdios do cristianismo eram 315 evangelhos, mas a Igreja admitiu apenas 4 (os já conhecidos, que formam o Novo Testamento). Isto ocorreu no concílio de Nicéia, aos 325 d.C., 1º concílio ecumênico da Igreja, convocado pelo imperador Constantino. Trezentos bispos, homens comuns, mas sedentos de poder, reuniram-se como se fossem detentores da verdade e decidiram que apenas os evangelhos de Mateus, Marcos, Lucas e João eram verdadeiros.”

A princípio, os hebreus respaldaram-se apenas na mitologia sumeriana (…) posteriormente sincretizaram [sua mitologia] com o zoroastrismo persa, absorvendo principalmente o dualismo e a escatologia zoroástrica, durante o cativeiro da Babilônia. Ao se fazer um estudo comparativo, constata-se a intensa influência das mitologias mesopotâmicas e do zoroastrismo nas escrituras hebraicas e, por conseguinte, na Bíblia”

As passagens bíblicas existentes no Gênesis, inerentes à criação do mundo, refletem claramente a intensa influência do épico da criação Enuma Elish. (…) Enuma Elish é o mito babilônio da Criação, descoberto por Austen Henry Layard, em 1849 (de forma fragmentada em tábuas de argila), nas ruínas da biblioteca de Assurbanipal, em Nínive (Mossul, Iraque), e publicado por George Smith, em 1876.”

O livro mais antigo da Bíblia é o de Jó, datando entre 500 a 400 a.C.”

não há lógica em Deus referir-se a Ele mesmo no plural para dizer que criará o homem à Sua imagem e semelhança.”

Edom significa vermelho, segundo nome de Esaú, irmão gêmeo de Jacó, considerado o pai dos edomitas; a terra dos edomitas”

O ARQUÉTIPO DAS BRUXAS

Lilith laylah, layl (noite, hebraico); lil (vento/ar) + lulti (lascívia, sumério); lulu (libertinagem, sumério)

A exclusão de Lilith do texto bíblico ocorreu de maneira gradual, e bem anteriormente à tradução da versão Vulgata (…) feita por São Jerônimo, em latim, usada pela I. Católica durante muitos séculos e fonte de diversas traduções das quais derivam as Bíblias atuais). Roberto Sicuteri, autor do livro Lilith, a Lua Negra, confirma que é na época da transposição da versão jeovística da Bíblia (séc. X a.C.)¹ para a versão sacerdotal (587-538 a.C.) que a lenda de Lilith teria sido eliminada, entretanto, ainda restam pequenos resquícios desta tradição em fragmentos deste texto, à exemplo (sic) do Livro de Isaías.”

¹ Não bate com a datação do Livro de Jó dada acima.

Lilith também é um demônio feminino da mitologia babilônica (…) que habitava lugares desertos. A Cabala faz referência à (sic) Lilith como a 1ª mulher de Adão, mas, em outro trecho, também é tida como a serpente que induziu Eva a comer o fruto proibido (Patai 81:455f).”

EVA POTRANQUINHA DO SENHOR: “Lilith não aceitava ficar por baixo nas relações sexuais e Adão recusava-se em inverter as posições. Isto foi o estopim para desencadear uma grande altercação entre o casal primordial, à qual (sic) gerou uma imensa indisposição, que culminou na separação.”

…onde se tornou a noiva de Samael/Asmodeus/Leviatã, o senhor das forças do mal do sitra achra (‘outro lado’…) (…) um dos príncipes de Lúcifer” “Lilith acasala-se (sic) com os demônios, parindo cem (…) diariamente, cujos machos são denominados Lilim, ou Liliotes, ou Linilins, e as fêmeas Liliths (o termo Lilim aparece no Targum Jerushalami, a bênção sacerdotal dos Números 6:26

Lilith [em esculturas babilônicas] ostenta um tipo de gorro ou chapéu escalonado, adornado com enfeites laterais e um disco solar no topo, caracterizando-a como uma deusa (e não como um demônio)”

Lilith aparece também no épico babilônico de Gilgamesh (o lendário rei sumério), em aproximadamente 2 mil a.C., como uma prostituta vampira que era incapaz de procriar e cujos seios estavam secos.” “Muitos acreditam também que há uma relação entre Lilith e Inanna, deusa suméria da guerra, da fertilidade e do prazer sexual.” “Em seus templos [de Inanna] se praticava a prostituição sagrada e suas sacerdotisas eram conhecidas como Nu-gig.” “Também não é incomum que se confunda Lilith com Ishtar ou até mesmo com Ísis, pela ligação destas com a morte. Vale dizer que as deusas Inanna dos sumérios, Asterote dos filisteus, Ísis dos egípcios, Ishtar dos acádios e posteriormente dos babilônios, Astarte dos fenícios e Ostara (Easter), a deusa da fertilidade e da primavera na mitologia nórdica, são cognatas.”

Quando a lua nova chegava, costumava-se dizer que a deusa estava com as regras.” Literalmente? Genealogia do termo regras para se referir ao mênstruo na faculdade de legislar sobre…?

Entre 3 mil e 2,5 mil a.C., quando os sumerianos passaram a ter contatos com culturas patriarcais, ocorre a passagem da concepção religiosa matriarcal para a patriarcal, então os templos dedicados à deusa foram postos abaixo e as práticas sexuais foram reprimidas e se tornaram parte da sombra, o poder da mulher foi identificado com o mal e o demônio (mas o politeísmo foi mantido, diga-se de passagem).” “A deusa passou a ser denominada como <a Grande Abominação>” “A deusa de Israel chamava-se Asherah (ou Aserá), esposa de Yahweh. Para a maioria das pessoas que lêem a Bíblia, a idéia de um único Deus de Israel, Yahweh, parece ser clara. No entanto, descobertas arqueológicas das últimas décadas vêm demonstrando que nem sempre foi assim.” Vou explicar ao longo das passagens por que esse “cientificismo” do autor depõe contra ele, e não a favor.

Pesquisas destacam [fonte???] a época do profeta Elias como o período histórico em que se começa a falar da exclusividade do Deus de Israel, principalmente no embate com o deus Baal e no processo de sincretismo, onde Yahweh incorpora as características de Baal.” Interessante.

processo de diabolização de outras divindades”

Num primeiro momento, a divindade Yahweh teria sido um elemento religioso que veio de fora do contexto cananeu. Nesta época, possivelmente era o Deus El que ocupava o trono do panteão divino.”

Haroldo Reimer aponta 5 fases do desenvolvimento do monoteísmo no Antigo Israel, a saber: a 1ª fase seria marcada pelo sincretismo entre El e Yahweh, no qual El é uma divindade cananéia cujas características são de Criador da terra e pai dos deuses (analogamente, o sumeriano deus Apsu também era o progenitor dos deuses, diga-se de passagem); a 2ª fase, por volta do séc. IX a.C., seria marcada pelos conflitos com o deus Baal. Baal era filho de El, cuja característica principal era a fertilidade; [nenhum deus pode ser eunuco!] a 3ª fase estaria na ênfase da adoração exclusiva de Yahweh. O profeta Oséias, no séc. VIII a.C., equipara a idolatria à adoração de outras divindades. [?] Neste período, acontece a reforma de Ezequias (II Reis 18:4), que mostra a remoção dos lugares altos e a destruição da serpente de bronze, Neustã. Reforma legitimada legalmente através do Código da Aliança (Êx. 20:22-23 e 29); A 4ª fase remete à época de dominação assíria, com a reforma de Josias (II Reis 22 e 23), justificada legalmente pelo Código Deuteronômico, englobando uma série de medidas visando a (sic) exclusividade de Yahweh e sua centralidade em Jerusalém. (…) A 5ª fase seria marcada pelo monoteísmo absoluto e estaria relacionada com o período do exílio. Gên. 1 afirma o poder criacional de Yahweh diante do domínio babilônico ancorado na fidelidade à divindade Marduk (a influência da mitologia babilônica).”

Conforme a pesquisadora Monika Ottermann, que traça o panorama da presença da deusa em Israel, da Idade do Bronze à Idade do Ferro, no Oriente Médio, datando a Idade do Bronze Médio entre 1800 a 1500 a.C., a representação da deusa é caracterizada como ‘Deusa-Nua’, destacando o triângulo púbico, emergindo também representações em forma de ramos ou pequenas árvores estilizadas, combinação que vem a ser denominada ‘Deusa-Árvore’. Os ramos, árvore ou pequenas árvores, brotando com suas raízes no triângulo púbico, simboliza a busca pela vida (…) (vale dizer que o hexagrama judaico, conhecido como estrela de Davi, símbolo do Estado de Israel, é formado por 2 triângulos opostos e sobrepostos” Ou seja: SEXO!

Vários selos ou impressões de selos que associam símbolos astrais com árvores estilizadas foram encontrados na Palestina e na Transjordânia, o que reforça interpretações sobre a existência de um culto à deusa Asherah ao lado de Yahweh.”

No âmbito da mitologia grega, Lilith é associada à deusa Hécate – analogamente, <a mulher escarlate> do Apocalipse –, uma deusa que guarda as portas do inferno montada em um enorme cão de 3 cabeças”

Sol Invictus (Sol Invicto, em latim [não diga!]), também conhecido pelo nome completo, Deus Sol Invicto, era um título religioso aplicado a 3 divindades distintas durante o Império Romano tardio.” Mitra Marte

Correção: Não se trata do império romano tardio, posto que muito anterior à cristianização.

Mitra significava amigo no idioma falado na Índia védica. Já no persa avéstico, tinha o significado de contrato. Atualmente, usa-se esta última semasiologia,¹ e existem diversas grafias para Mitra: Mihr [amor], Meher, Meitros, etc.

¹ “Linguística Estudo semântico que consiste em partir do signo linguístico para a determinação do conceito (por opos. a onomasiologia).”

onomasiologia: “Estudo semântico que consiste em buscar, a partir do conceito, os signos linguísticos, a expressão que lhe corresponde (por opos. a semasiologia).”

A deusa Anahita (Anihata, Anahira) era uma virgem imaculada, era a mãe de Mitra, era considerada a mãe de deus e a deidade feminina do fogo, dentro do panteão de deuses avésticos.”

Mitra (…) foi despojado de sua soberania e todos os seus poderes e atributos foram atribuídos a Ahura-Mazda.”

HaShatan HaSatan Satã

A Síndrome de Estocolmo aplicada em grande escala a um povo se chama Síndrome Babilônica.

Os soldados macedônios, com suas esposas e filhos persas, levaram o culto [de] Mitra à Macedônia e à Grécia.”

Mitrídates, o Grande – 120 a 63 a.C., o último persa de sua estirpe, derrotado por Roma em 66. Chamado em Montesquieu, Espírito das Leis (Jean Melville) de Mitríades.

Na época, existiam 2 escolas rabínicas. Cada uma com pontos de vista diferentes. Uma seguia os ensinamentos de Hilel, o ancião, e a outra os ensinamentos de Shamai. Beit Hilel e Beit Shamai eram os nomes das escolas. Hilel e Shamai foram 2 renomados eruditos judeus. Hilel era uma pessoa amável, simples, próxima às camadas mais modestas da sociedade, e suas máximas breves refletem sua generosidade, piedade e amor à humanidade. Shamai era extremamente íntegro e mais rígido e irascível. Yeshua deve ter estudado na escola de Hilel.”

Aquele que tenta engrandecer seu nome o destrói; aquele que não aumenta seu conhecimento o diminui; e aquele que não estuda, merece morrer.”

Hilel

Conta-se que [quem conta?], quando Herodes apareceu na sala do Sinédrio, rodeado pela guarda real, totalmente armados, (sic) o silêncio reinava. Podia-se sentir o sentimento (sic) de intimidação naquela sala, quando, (sic) apenas Shamai, sem medo, levantou-se para falar contra ele.”

Em suma, a escola Beit Hilel pendia ao judaísmo essênio, que era mais uma filosofia de vida do que uma religião. Já a escola Beit Shamai tinha um perfil notoriamente farisaico, o que a aproximava do judaísmo dominante.” A história do farisaísmo e a história da religião se confundem.

Em função de Sua Missão neste orbe, os pais de Yeshua foram previamente selecionados em razão de seus genes, [Genes? Deus veio do século XX numa máquina do tempo, como uma espécie de John Connor?] conduta moral e, obviamente, evolução espiritual.”

O CARPINTEIRO QUE NÃO CARPIA, POIS TINHA MUITOS LIVROS QUE LER: “Certamente, Yeshua estudou o hinduísmo, o zoroastrismo, o budismo, filosofias, mitologias e crenças gregas, egípcias, etc. Tudo isso, Ele (sic) deve ter feito durante os Seus (sic) anos de vida oculta.”

A Igreja Católica não aceita Jesus como rabino porque um rabino deve ser casado, principalmente no séc. I, e isto vai contra o celibato. Outras questões: se Jesus fôra casado, quem fôra a Sua (sic) esposa? Maria Madalena? Jesus teve filhos? A vida do Mestre é um mistério total. Ele mesmo não deixara nada escrito por razões óbvias. [?] O importante era Sua Mensagem. (sic) Ele não tencionava criar religião alguma.” Ora, se o importante era sua mensagem, ele deveria ter deixado escritos. Mas se ele não pretendia deixar escritos, por razões óbvias, tampouco poderia esperar semear alguma coisa, religião ou não! Paroxismo.

O libertador que os sacerdotes esperavam era diferente. Esperavam um messias que entrasse em conluio com eles, ocupasse o trono de Davi e promovesse a união do povo de Israel para deflagrar uma insurreição contra Roma”

Estar na fé implica o indivíduo freqüentar assiduamente o templo ou igreja, participar dos rituais, ler e crer na bíblia e nas pregações, sem duvidar de nada.”

Trechos que foram criados pelos antigos líderes judaicos-hebreus (muito antes de Cristo) para sustentar o judaísmo, que os mantinha na opulência e no poder, p.ex.: ‘Trazei todos os dízimos à casa do Tesouro, para que haja mantimento na minha casa; e provai-me nisto, diz o Senhor dos Exércitos, se eu não vos abrir as janelas do céu e não derramar sobre vós bênção sem medida’ (Malaquias 3:10)”

FILHOS DE LEVI QUERIA DIZER O CENTRÃO DE ARTHUR LIRA? “Aos filhos de Levi, dei todos os dízimos em Israel por herança, pelo serviço que prestam, serviço da tenda da congregação. E nunca mais os filhos de Israel [os populares] se chegarão à tenda da congregação, para que não levem sobre si o pecado e morram. Mas os levitas farão o serviço da tenda da congregação e responderão por suas faltas; estatuto perpétuo é este para todas as vossas gerações. [Porém, quando o dízimo é secreto, não há apuração de faltas] E não terão eles nenhuma herança no meio dos filhos de Israel. [não terão trabalho honesto, viverão do roubo do povo] Porque os dízimos dos filhos de Israel, que apresentam ao Senhor em oferta, dei-os por herança aos levitas…” Números 18:21-23 – Números, esse pessoal gosta muito de númeRo$!

No entanto, nada do que alguém dedicar irremissivelmente ao Senhor, de tudo o que tem, seja homem, ou animal, ou campo da sua herança, se poderá vender, nem resgatar; toda coisa assim consagrada será santíssima ao Senhor” Levítico 27:28 Extremamente ambíguo!

MERCADORES DA FÉ: “Os atuais finórios de Deus utilizam muito os supracitados versículos do capítulo 18 do livro de Números para se colocarem na mesma posição dos levitas judeus, transferindo a eles uma incumbência textualmente aplicada tão-somente aos levitas, mas literalmente incabível aos missionários da cristandade, pois não encontra respaldo no Novo Testamento” “A isto se deu o nome de teologia da prosperidade, principal característica das religiões neopentecostais.”

a cultura sumeriana formou a hebraica.” Nomeadamente a doutrina do povo eleito.

Os Evangelhos Sinóticos foram escritos por volta dos anos 50. O evangelho de João foi escrito aproximadamente no ano 90, portanto, apesar de serem cópias de cópias de outras cópias, assim como o de João também, os evangelhos de Marcos, Mateus e Lucas são mais confiáveis do que o de João, por serem mais contemporâneos a Jesus, ou seja, estão mais próximos do Jesus histórico na linha temporal.”

NÃO EXISTE IGREJA SEM FÉ, MAS EXISTE FÉ SEM IGREJA: “Dentre os Evangelhos Sinóticos, somente Marcos 16:16 menciona a salvação apenas pela fé, entretanto, a maioria dos estudiosos bíblicos afirma que Marcos 16:16 é um versículo espúrio no evangelho segundo Marcos, pois destoa totalmente dos demais escritos atribuídos ao evangelista e, principalmente, porque o trecho em questão não consta nos primeiros manuscritos do evangelho de Marcos.”

MANUAL DE COMO SER ANTICRISTÃO NO SÉCULO XXI

Suriman ataca da forma errada: expondo contradições entre escritos bíblicos. Mas eu diria que se não houvesse qualquer contradição esse grande livro (ou livro grande) seria muito menos amado! Não é expondo contradições que se combaterá os cristãos de todos os tempos e lugares. Uma estratégia melhor seria, p.ex., denunciar o livro sagrado como muito estreito e linear. Um Deus onisciente e onipresente deveria poder ser capaz de mais nuances, matizes, perspectivas e contradições – as que vemos são muito poucas, mambembes, astutas no pior sentido de pobreza argumentativa, quase que evidenciam um pragmatismo, uma racionalidade temporã, de mercadores da fé, um livro ESCRITO ATRAVÉS DE DEUS por mãos humanas que nada tem de divino, é chão e abjeto, parece um manual de economia! Por isso é que é uma fraude, e esse Deus não existe ou foi incrivelmente traído pelos descendentes de seus profetas e sacerdotes, que conseguiram apagar todos os traços do Evangelho Original e até calar a boca de seu Filho, que Era Ele Mesmo. Ou seja, um deus fraco; e deuses não são fracos. Ou apenas um Deus satânico – mas cuidado, isso é muito popular entre os cristãos que hoje já não sentem necessidade sequer de simular o ascetismo! Pois Ele quer o mal; e nosso objetivo não é mais atacar o livro, que o deixa claro, mas, com poder político, não deixar qualquer traço ou tolerância dessas práticas más!

Paulo encoraja a soberba e a megalomania, elitizando o cristianismo, fazendo um jogo perigoso, que fomenta discriminações, preconceitos, discórdias e até pelejas, opondo-se ao amor universal pregado por Jesus, e contrariando outros trechos que afirmam que Deus não faz acepção de pessoas, como, p.ex., em Romanos 2:11, que é uma epístola dele mesmo, por sinal.”

No hinduísmo, um avatar é uma manifestação corporal de um ser imortal, por vezes até do Ser Supremo. Deriva do sânscrito Avatara, que significa <descida>, normalmente denotando (sic – conotando) uma religião das encarnações de Vishnu (tais como Krishna), que muitos hinduístas reverenciam como divindade.”

A 1ª semelhança encontrada pelos tradutores das tábuas em escrita cuneiforme é a mais impressionante. Foi a mola propulsora de toda a discussão sobre a veracidade dos textos bíblicos, pois a descrição do dilúvio não só é a mais bem-conservada tábua de toda a epopéia, mas a mais rica em detalhes e semelhanças com a descrição no Gênesis. Além do quê, outras narrativas do dilúvio foram encontradas em forma de poemas isolados e com outros personagens, como as tábuas de Atra-Hasis, a Epopéia de Erra, os textos do rei Ziusudra (Utnapishtim).”

Ea (deus da água doce e da sabedoria, patrono das artes e protetor da humanidade na mitologia acadiana e babilônica; denominado Enki na mitologia suméria) avisa Utnapishtim em um sonho das intenções de Enlil e orienta-o a como sobreviver à catástrofe que estaria por vir [extinção do homem?]: <põe abaixo tua casa e constrói um barco….>

Eu carreguei o interior da nave com tudo o que eu tinha de ouro e de coisas vivas. Minha família, meus parentes, os animais do campo – os domesticados e os selvagens – e todos os artesãos.” O que seria do mundo sem os artesãos! Até o detalhe do corvo que foi solto e encontrou, finalmente, terra firme após 6 dias de dilúvio foi copiado pelo VT de Gilgamesh!

Enlil, furioso com Ea por ter permitido que um humano sobrevivesse e conhece[sse] o segredo dos deuses, viu-se sem alternativa que não a de transformar Utnapishtim em um imortal, para que sua maldição de que nenhum mortal sobrevivesse se completasse.”

Gilgamesh então mergulha no oceano e obtém a planta da juventude eterna. Mas não se alimenta dela a tempo, decidindo levá-la consigo para Uruk e compartilhá-la com os anciãos do povo. “Gilgamesh é surpreendido por uma serpente marinha que lhe rouba a flor, perdendo para sempre o segredo da imortalidade”

fruto – serpente – mortalidade (terra)

fruto – serpente – imortalidade (água)

Gilgamesh então ficou desolado e abatido, pois além de fracassar em sua missão perdera para sempre o irmão Enkidu, restando-lhe apenas, melancolicamente, esperar o dia de sua morte chegar.”

O Mito de Dilmum (o casal divino Enki e Nintu).

Os sumérios foram, provavelmente, os primeiros a habitar o sul da Mesopotâmia. A região foi ocupada em 5 mil a.C. (…) ali [se] constru[íram] as primeiras cidades de que a humanidade tem conhecimento, como Ur, Uruk e Lagash. As cidades foram erigidas sobre colinas.”

No início do 2º milênio a.C. a região da Mesop. constitui-se em um grande e unificado império que tinha como centro administrativo a cidade da Babilônia, situada nas margens do rio Eufrates. Os amoritas, povos semitas provenientes da Arábia, edificaram o Primeiro Império Babilônico. Este povo é conhecido também como <antigos babilônicos>, o que os diferencia dos caldeus, fundadores do II Império Bab., denominados NEOBABILÔNICOS.”

De origem semita, os assírios viviam do pastoreio e habitavam as margens do rio Tigre.” “conquistaram (…) o Egito. O centro adm. do império assírio era Nínive.”

os [também semitas] caldeus foram os principais responsáveis pela derrota dos assírios e pela organização do novo império babil. Nabucodonosor foi o soberano mais conhecido dos caldeus. (…) governou por 60 anos e após sua morte os persas dominaram o novo imp. bab.” Ao todo, em somente 7 décadas construíram os lendários Jardins Suspensos e a Torre de Babel.

Uma etnia tão fratricida realmente precisava inventar um Deus vingador-Deus do amor (no fim é indiferente, desde que unisse as “tribos”). Para o leigo que lê a bíblia, entretanto, monarcas como Nabucodonosor passam como governantes dos gentios, cem por cento pagãos, sem qualquer relação com a árvore genealógica hebraica.

Apesar de matemática, astronomia e medicina altamente desenvolvidas, a principal realização cultural dos sumérios foi a escrita fonética. “Quem decifrou a escrita cuneiforme foi Henry C. Rawlinson.”

Anterior ao Código de Hamurabi [por muito tempo considerada a lei mais antiga da humanidade] tem-se o o Cód. de Ur-Nammu, descoberto em 1952 pelo assiriólogo (…) Samuel Noah Kromer.”

Sargão I é o 1º monarca da história a manter um exército de prontidão.”

Apesar de terem preservado a maior parte da cultura suméria, os amoritas introduziram seu idioma semítico, um ancestral do hebreu na região” Neste idioma é escrita a Epopéia gilgameshiana.

1750 a.C.: (…) os cassitas, um povo não-semítico, conquista a maior parte da Mesop.”

o historiador e lingüista Zecharia Sitchin, especialista em traduções de tabletes cuneiformes, revela que[,] para os sumérios e babilônios os Anunnaki eram, literalmente, astronautas extraterrestres que aterrissaram na região onde se situa o Iraque, há aproximadamente 450 mil anos, em missão de mineração, que se estendeu do Oriente-Médio à África.” Eridu, considerada a cidade mais antiga do mundo, teria sido fundada por esses curiosos E.T.s! “…com o objetivo de obter ouro em quantidade suficiente para sanar os problemas no ecossistema de seu planeta natal, Nibiru.” Ah, o homem! Por que um povo capaz de se teletransportar precisaria de OURO?! Péssima base literária!

Segundo os sumérios, o trab. de mineração ficou comprometido por rebilões entre os Anunnaki, o que levou Enki e Ninti, brilhantes cientistas, a interferir no ritmo evolutivo do tipo humanóide simiesco que habitava o planeta. Através de experiências de engenharia genética, foi obtido o protótipo do Homo sapiens, chamado pelos sum. de Adapa/Adamu.” E daqui pra frente só piora! Mas como série estilo Arquivo X seria sensacional!

a cada 3600 anos [curiosamente coincidindo com o sistema matemático sexagesimal babilônico, que coisa!] o planeta Nibiru completa um período orbital em torno do Sol [qual sol?] e, durante sua aproximação da Terra, diversos cataclismos se sucedem. Os Anunnaki então aproveitariam essa <janela cósmica> para retornarem à Terra.” Prefiro o lore de One Piece!

Nibiru/Marduk, 10º planeta (tendo Plutão como 9º) do sistema solar ou talvez o 6º ou 7º planeta da estrela anã-marrom que seria a suposta irmã gêmea do nosso Sol.” U-A-U!

Nibiru é um planeta do s.s. citado no poema Enuma Elish (Batalha Celeste)¹ e associado ao deus Marduk (…) Os sumérios descreviam nosso sistema solar como um conjunto de 12 corpos celestes significativos” Claro que também corresponderia ao sistema duodecimal criado para a medição do tempo!

¹ Narração da criação do planeta Terra por Marduk.

Marduk (…) era filho de uma relação incestuosa entre Enki e Ninhursag. Foi pai de Dumuzi (o bíblico Tamuz), correspondente ao deus egípcio Osíris. Sua consorte era Sarpanitu.” “foi o vencedor do monstro Tiamat, que personifica o caos primordial; divide-o em 2 partes, com as quais forma o céu e a terra.”

Intertestamentário é o período de tempo que abrange 400 anos entre 397 e 6 a.C.. Trata-se do período situado entre o V. e o N. Testamento.” Hiato Malaquias-Mateus.

De acordo com o Livro dos Jubileus, Sete casou-se com sua irmã mais jovem Azura e teve vários filhos, entre os quais Enos. [que não sofria de azia]” “É importante esclarecer que Sete é também o nome de um personagem jaredita do Livro de Éter (um dos livros que compõem o Livro de Mórmon). § Alguns estudiosos do séc. XIX identificam Sete com Shitti, um epíteto do deus Marduque”

Algumas religiões e crenças, culturalmente atrasadas, encorajam seus seguidores à prática do suicídio.” São tantas coisas erradas na frase que mal saberia por onde começar…

Eostre, Ostara ou Ostera é a deusa da fertilidade e do renascimento na mitologia anglo-saxã, na mitologia nórdica e mitologia germânica. A primavera, lebres e ovos coloridos eram os símbolos da fertilidade e renovação a ela associados.” Páscoa vem do latim pache, passagem, originalmente transição entre estações (fim do inverno no hemisfério norte). Mas também “Deusa da Aurora” no Alto Alemão ou simplesmente sol nascente em outras raízes anglo-saxãs.

Eos, Deusa do Amanhecer na mitologia grega.” // Astarte // Ishtar

Varuna é um deus indiano da criação. Possivelmente é a mais augusta divindade do panteão védico.” “Varuna tentou impedir o nascimento de Indra, mas foi impossível” Varuna foi então rebaixado de Zeus hindu para mero deus da noite e dos oceanos. Nenhum olimpo é uma liga, i.e., há sempre rebaixamento e ascensão de semi-deuses e heróis correndo por fora!

A principal coletânea da mitologia persa é o Shahnameh de Ferdowsi, escrito há mil anos. A obra de Ferdowsi tem por base as histórias e personagens do zoroastrismo e do masdeísmo, não apenas o Avesta, mas também o Bundahishn e o Denkard. Segundo a crença, o sexo era predominante, assim como o amor verdadeiro. [?!] O primeiro beijo (…) era fundamental…” Bem, continua sendo entre nós… “Já a 1ª relação sexual deveria ser presenciada pelos pais.” Isto sim está fora da cartilha!

A mitologia persa é ao mesmo tempo muito próxima e diferente da mitologia hindu. Elas são próximas, porque os iranianos são um povo indo-europeu cuja língua tem grande semelhança com o sânscrito e foram um povo que estabeleceu constantes relações com os arianos da Índia. E são diferentes, pois a religião dos antigos persas adquiriu um aspecto mais moral que mitológico.”

Ahura Mazda é o criador de outras 6 ou 7 divindades supremas, os Amesha Spenta, que reinam, cada um, sobre uma parte da criação”

Subordinados dos Amesha Spenta:

I. Mitra, o mestre do espaço livre;

II. Tistrya, o deus das trovoadas;

III. Verethraghna, o deus da vitória;

IV. Os Izeds.

Angra Mainyu perdeu sua identidade zoroastrista e masdeísta original na posterior literatura persa, sendo finalmente descrito como um Dev ou div, celestial ou radiante [um gigante com o corpo manchado e 2 chifres].”

Somente após a reforma religiosa de Zaratustra o termo dev foi associado com demônios. Mesmo assim os persas que habitavam a região ao sul do mar Cáspio continuaram a adorar os devs e resistiram à pressão para aceitar o zoroastrismo e as lendas em torno dos devs sobreviveram até os dias atuais. P.ex., a lenda do Dev-e Sepid (Dev branco) de Mazandaran.”

A personagem mais importante nos épicos persas é Rostam. Sua contraparte é Zahhak, um símbolo do despotismo que foi finalmente derrotado por Kaveh, que liderou um levante popular contra ele.” “A serpente, como em muitas outras mitologias, representava o mal” “os pássaros, em especial, eram sinal de boa sorte.”

Peri (avéstico Pairika), considerada uma mulher bonita porém má na mitologia mais antiga, tornou-se gradualmente menos má e mais bonita até transformar-se em um símbolo de beleza no período islâmico similar aos houri – espécie de anjos – do Paraíso. Entretanto, outra mulher má, Patiareh, atualmente simboliza a prostituição.”

a reconstrução da história da Índia Védica é baseada no estudo dos Vedas (…) associado às informações arqueológicas.” “muito do que se sabe da época é baseado no Rig Veda – o mais antigo texto sânscrito escrito e preservado. Acredita-se que estas e outras narrativas épicas, como o Ramayana e o Mahabharata, se originam neste período, a partir da tradição oral” era de mistura cultural. A cultura ariana foi aos poucos se mesclando à cultura indiana local. A partir de 200 a.C. este processo se completou e o que conhecemos como cultura indiana tomou sua forma geral.”

A ordem social reflete a presença dos árias [brâmanes] no poder e, com isso, a supremacia dos sacerdotes [sempre um mal!] se consolidou no sistema de castas.” Em breve, THE LAWS OF MANU no Seclusão.

Os chamados impuros ou párias não pertenciam a nenhuma casta [<quinta casta>]. Eram nascidos de uma união de pessoas de castas diferentes [superficial: não procede – apenas se forem provindos de união não-sancionada – e desde que um brâmane tenha pelo menos 4 esposas a 4ª pode até ser uma Sudra] ou de expulsos de suas castas por terem violado as leis. Não podiam viver nas cidades, ler os livros sagrados [falso: nem mesmo os shatriya podem ler o Veda!] e banhar-se nas águas do Ganges.”

Ahura Mazda deriva de ashura, senhor, deus menor hindu. E no entanto os outros deuses são devas, que na etimologia seriam aproximados de dev, demônio. Ou seja: Índia e Zoroastrismo são essencialmente opostos (pode-se dizer que uma religião é a outra de ponta-cabeça). E no entanto estas duas religiões são um contraste absoluto com as noções hebraicas – formando-se um triângulo de oposição entre macro-religiões, a dos judeus a mais contrária e refratária às outras crenças.

Sempre imaginei que Maniqueísmo e Mazdeísmo ou Masdeísmo (o Zoroastrismo, enfim) fossem sinônimos. O que não quadra é a informação seguinte: “Maniqueísmo, filosofia religiosa sincrética e dualística ensinada pelo profeta persa Mani (ou Manes), combinando elementos do Zoroastrismo, Cristianismo e Gnosticismo” O mais curioso é que Mani é muito próximo de Manu, autor de um dos códigos de lei mais antigos, inscrito no hinduísmo e obedecendo aos Vedas. E manes também é uma nomenclatura para determinada classe de divindades importantes na ritualística bramânica.

Zoroastrismo (doutrina mais pura) > Masdeísmo (refundação “decadente”)

Ísis, a deusa do amor e da mágica, tornou-se a deusa-mãe do Egito.” E ainda: médica, casamenteira (inscrito em amor e magia) e incentivadora da agricultura, patrona da harmonia e das festas, além de governante no sentido sócio-político, ao lado de seu marido Osíris. Podemos portanto chamá-la sem equívoco de Deusa da Cultura Egípcia, ou Embaixadora do Egito enquanto civilização. Teria originado o Rio Nilo. Por diversos acontecimentos da mitologia, é associada à árvore do tamarindo. Por último, Ísis também é a deusa da Morte ou da transição da vida terrena para a próxima vida, tendo criado o ritual do embalsamento.

MITOS & ARQUÉTIPOS

Nas odisséias de Ísis e inúmeros outros deuses de outras mitologias há sempre uma cena arquetípica: a deusa (sempre uma mulher), disfarçada, se torna ama de um príncipe recém-nascido, filho do rei do local. A ele se afeiçoa e deseja presenteá-lo com a imortalidade mediante um ritual que, visto pelos olhos de um leigo, parece um homicídio hediondo, geralmente envolvendo as labaredas do fogo. Sempre, no momento de ser consumada a imortalidade, o ritual é interrompido por alguma testemunha do palácio e o príncipe nunca obtém a imortalidade. A estória de Zigfried e Aquiles é uma variante deste arquétipo, excluindo elementos como “príncipe ainda bebê” e a ama, que se converte noutra figura feminina, como a mãe de Aquiles, que o segura pelos calcanhares e o banha em águas que concedem a imortalidade – dando-lhe uma imortalidade parcial ou condicionada, destinada a ser vencida quando um guerreiro atinge seu ponto fraco, única parte mortal do corpo, o calcanhar-de-Aquiles.

No mito de Osíris há outra alusão a um ser assexuado ou hermafrodita, tema de inúmeros mitos, como o de Platão n’O Banquete, conotando uma suposta perfeição ou transcendência em relação à condição limitada dos dois sexos, fundindo todas as suas qualidades num ser Uno. Osíris fôra retalhado em inúmeros pedaços e pelos dons de Ísis e sua irmã voltou à vida, com todas as suas partes reconectadas, exceto a genitália, que havia sido devorada por um peixe do Nilo. Nasce o ser perfeito e assexual – e o que eu comentei acima de “nenhum deus pode ser hermafrodita”, cai por terra!

Hórus é o filho de Ísis e Osíris. Como a ressurreição de Osíris pôde ser apenas temporária, já que ele possuía o corpo mas sua alma já havia partido, Hórus foi concebido numa “atípica lua-de-mel” entre Ísis e o deus morto-vivo, que finalmente foi embalsamado e partiu de maneira pacífica ao Outro Mundo. Tal circunstância torna Hórus divindade dual, tanto da Vida quanto da Morte, e sua aparência reflete sua capacidade espiritual: meio-homem, meio-falcão.

Set, deus-cobra, arqui-inimigo de Hórus, Osíris e Ísis, entrou em combate com o filho do casal: este embate entre falcão e serpente é outro arquétipo. Nietzsche utiliza tal simbologia em seu próprio Zaratustra (o que podemos considerar o mesmo que: a superação de todas as religiões monoteístas após a morte de Deus, ainda que usando velhos nomes e velhos símbolos), em que Zaratustra é secundado por dois discípulos, uma serpente e um falcão [na verdade, águia], falantes. Como Zaratustra anuncia aquilo que virá muito além do bem e do mal, a serpente e o falcão não são mais, respectivamente, representantes nem do mal nem do bem.

Sobre Ísis (bom tropo para usar em um RPG): “Suas habilidades mágicas melhoraram muito quando ela tirou proveito da velhice de a fim de enganá-lo, fazendo-o revelar seu nome e, assim, dando a ela acesso a um pouco de seu poder.”

A VIRGEM MARIA EGÍPCIA: “Do morto e castrado Osíris, Ísis extraiu por conta própria a semente viva. E muitas vezes foi retratada em pinturas ou esculturas com o divino filho, Hórus, sobre o joelho.”

Osíris mandava no mundo dos mortos, seu falo perdido para sempre nas águas do Nilo, onde dele corria um fluxo interminável de sêmen, fertilizando os extraordinários campos do Egito todos os anos quando o rio transbordava.” “Osíris, o deus do sangue, julgava o malfeitor olhando dentro do coração do mesmo.” Isso não o impediu de cair numa simplória armadilha de Set.

Bellenus é o deus celta do Sol.” “Era um dos principais deuses da mitologia celta, mas era uma divindade mais regional, adorada principalmente no norte da Itália e na costa mediterrânea da Gália.”

Na antiga religião, antes da Igreja destruir este culto e transformá-lo no que se conhece como <bruxaria>, os camponeses iam para os bosques de carvalhos à noite e acendiam enormes fogueiras para a deusa, o que tornou esta festividade conhecida como As Fogueiras de Beltane.” Origem de nossa festa junina, cristianizada.

Mabon (pronuncia-se mêibon) é também conhecido como Equinócio de Outono ou Lar da Colheita ou Festival da Segunda Colheita. Dia sagrado no paganismo, em especial na religião wicca. (…) corresponde a (…) 20 de março no hemisfério sul e (…) 22 de setembro no hemisfério norte”

o ano-novo pagão (Samhain – pronuncia-se sou-en)” etimologia: samh, verão + fuin, fim. “É uma época de quilíbrio, onde o dia e a noite têm a mesma duração.”

O nome Mabon veio de um deus celta (também conhecido como Angus), o deus do amor.”

Lughnasadh (pronuncia-se lusaná) é também conhecido como Lammas ou Festival da Primeira Colheita. (…) Celebrado dia 2 de fevereiro no hemisfério sul”

O nome lusaná tem suas raízes em uma festa agrícola típica dos célticos. (…) em honra ao deus (…) do Sol: Lugh

Já o nome Lammas significa <A Massa de Lugh>, que representa o alimento (geralmente pão ou bolo ou qualquer outra massa) feito com grãos, que representam a colheita”

coven (grupo de bruxos)” ui ui ui!

Mani: a deusa brasileira da mandioca, alva como a lua!

grande parte da tradição do Halloween, do dia de todos os santos e do dia dos finados pode ser associada ao Samhain.” “Alguns autores acham que não existe nenhuma evidência que relacione o Samhain com o culto dos mortos e que esta crença se popularizou no séc. XIX.” “Era também a época em que o Sidhe (nome celta para duende) deixava antever o outro mundo.” Origem ainda do espantalho ou do Jack o’Lantern.

MITO <TEBAIDO> (+1 ARQUÉTIPO PARA A LISTA…): “A religião mitraica dos magos tem uma lenda como a maçonaria. [?] É a seguinte: Mitra (Luz) (…) nasceu da <rocha generativa>, [a pedra do gênesis de Raul Seixas?] debaixo da sombra de uma árvore sagrada. Uns pastores foram testemunhas (…) Viram-no sair da rocha, com a cabeça adornada (…) armado de um cutelo e levando uma tocha para iluminar as trevas” Pedra do tempo; quem tem teto de vidro que atire o primeiro dente!

Os pontos em comum entre a mitologia maga e a vida de Cristo segundo os evangelhos saltam à vista.” Com toda a certeza.

O mitraísmo – religião da moda no Império Romano – cultuava Mitra e a supracitada mitologia não poderia ficar de fora. Provavelmente os líderes da embrionária Igreja Católica optaram pela absorção da mitologia dos magos, amalgamando-a com a história de Jesus para adaptar o cristianismo às crenças romanas e, deste modo, torná-lo aprazível aos mitraístas, facilitando a conversão.”

Na tentativa de consolidar a totalidade do Imp. Romano sob o seu domínio, Licínio o Breve [imperador da banda oriental] marchou contra Constantino. Como parte de seu esforço para ganhar a lealdade de suas legiões, L. dispensou o exército e o serviço civil da política de tolerância do Edito de Milão, [que cessou a perseguição aos cristãos] permitindo-lhes sua expulsão. Alguns perderam propriedades e outros a vida. § Constantino venceu a guerra em 324 d.C.”

Em relação ao Antigo Testamento, o problema só foi definitivamente resolvido em 1546 (no Concílio de Trento), sendo incluídos o Livro da Sabedoria, atribuído a Salomão, o Eclesiastes ou Sirac, as Odes de Salomão, o Tobit ou Livro de Tobias, os Livros dos Macabeus e ainda outros.”

LINHA DO TEMPO (somente inseri os mais relevantes)

ANO – nº romano do Concílio – local – principais resultados

325 – IV – Nicéia – Apostasia do Arianismo; Fundação da Igreja Católica.

432 – VI – Éfeso – Apostasia do Nestorianismo.

451 – VII – Calcedônia – Apostasia do Monofisitismo.

553 – VIII – Constantinopla – Apostasia do resiliente Nestorianismo!

681 – IX – Constantinopla – Apostasia do Monotelitismo.

767 – X – Nicéia – permite a veneração de imagens [destruição do cristianismo primitivo, na opinião de muitos protestantes…]

(Entre 867 e 1064 – incontáveis cismas, mas o principal, entre a Romana e a Ortodoxa.)

869 – XI – Constantinopla – primeira trégua provisória Ocid. x Or.

1123 – XII – Latrão – Apostasia do Valdensismo e Albigensismo.

1139 – XIII Latrão – idem [!]

(Seguiriam mais dois em Latrão para o mesmo fim, o segundo em 1215 – XV Concílio.)

Daqui em diante não importa o número, os concílios são cada vez mais estapafúrdios, se já não o eram o bastante…

1431 – Concílio da Reforma (Basiléia, Ferrara, Florenza e Lausana)

1517 – real surgimento das Igrejas Protestantes (conclusão do processo de cisma iniciado quase um século antes). (Trento)

1545 – Contra-Reforma (Trento)

1870 – A grande besteira e heresia da infalibilidade papal, que duraria muito pouco tempo para uma religião milenar! (Vaticano)

1962 – “Concílio da modernização”, para fisgar os beatlemaníacos e afins!

O judaísmo era para ser uma filosofia de vida e não uma religião (assim como o cristianismo deveria[, e o hinduísmo logrou]).”

RECAPITULAÇÃO:

  • Essênios: judeus mais ortodoxos (anti-fariseus).

  • A partir dos cismas com os essênios, tudo é história política.

  • Os essênios eram vegetarianos e nunca sacrificaram animais a Javé. Não havia quase nenhuma lei religiosa entre eles.

Os hebreus (<descendentes do patriarca bíblico Éber>) é o nome dado ao povo que viveu na região do Oriente Médio a partir do II milênio a.C., e que daria origem aos povos semitas como os árabes e os israelitas, antepassados históricos e espirituais dos atuais judeus e muçulmanos.” “Os hebreus permaneceram por 3 séculos na Palestina, até a ocorrência de uma violenta seca que abalou a região.” Não me admira inventarem a estória de Noé depois de tamanho trauma.

No regresso à Palestina, após a escravidão egípcia e a morte de Moisés, assim era a demografia (principais etnias):

  • hebreus

  • cananeus

  • filisteus

Começa o Estado judeu.

A teoria de que os altos impostos derrubaram o reinado de Salomão (ancaps aprovam!).

Dominação assíria-babilônica da etnia já dividida em dois reinos (patética decadência).

Alexandre, o Grande bem que tentou mais uma vez separar o que jamais deveria ter sido novamente reunido (judeus e Palestina), mas depois de sua morte o ciclo seguiria…

palestinos, descedentes dos antigos filisteusGostaria de saber como essa palavra foi virar uma crítica da erudição acadêmica!

Suriman destaca os versículos sobre holocausto animal: Gênesis 8; Êxodo 18; Êxodo 29; Levítico 1, Levítico 4; Levítico 4; Números 6; Números 7; Números 8.

Espírito Santo, do hebraico Ruach Ha Kodesh. Suriman defende que a única razão d’<O> Espírito Santo (seria apenas ‘um espírito santo’) ter adquirido tamanha importância no credo cristão se deveu a um erro de tradução de Jerônimo. Depois cita o mesmo fenômeno como “jogada de mestre por parte da Igreja”. Ou é jogada de mestre ou é erro não-intencional de um tradutor honesto! Nem a Igreja é tão “inteligente” nem Jerônimo, patrono dos tradutores, era tão burro.

CITANDO O MIDRASH: “o Espírito Santo foi concebido como sendo por vezes um homem e outras uma mulher.” Aí está a drag queen do “pastor” André (indo pra) Vala***.

O Talmude também “enche” o saco com “aparições” do Espírito Santo ao longo da ZZZzzzhis…, perdão, da zzzhistória.

qualquer um que ensine a Torah em público partilha do E.S.” Virou um diplominha à la Direito pelo UniCEUB. Hahaha!

A visão judaica retrata, na idiossincrasia deles, a sintonia com o PAI e, conseqüentemente, com o Cosmo.” Quem é esse PAI, e esse Cosmo?! Qual a religião do autor?! Não me diga que é espírita?

EQUAÇÃO DA FÉ

(Torah + Neviim + Ctuvim) = Tanach = Antigo Testamento

hoje a maior parte dos estudiosos são unânimes [ou são unânimes ou são a maior parte… os dois não dá!] em concordar que Moisés não é o autor do texto que possuímos” Ó!

Talmude = Torá oral (que virou livro, duh)

Torah = Pentateuco, para todos os efeitos

Chumash (os 5): Bereshit, Shemot, Vayicra, Bamidbar, Devarim

O conteúdo do Tanakh é equivalente ao A.T., porém com outra divisão.”

Neviim = livros dos profetas, juízes, reis, etc. (História de Israel, haha)

Ctuvim = resíduo salomônico, Jó, Eclesiastes, Crônicas (senta que lá vem MAIS história…) etc.

Maomé não escreveu o Alcorão.” U-a-u!!!

Sufismo (os hereges místicos do maometismo, necessários, conforme toda religião monoteísta ensina): desdobramento em Cabala e Gnose.

POEMA DO ASSIM

ZAratustra: início e fim, A a Z.

choro-riso-choro

dança-reza-dança

sim-sala-bim

coisa ZAntiga ZAgora voltam às modaz.

Zaratustra se perguntava na infância: quem estipulou o valor dos valores?

Zaratustra, nascido de uma virgem…” Porra, variem um pouco o arquétipo!!!

Dos 20 aos 30, Z. viveu quase sempre isolado, habitando no alto de uma montanha, em cavernas sagradas.” “Em outros relatos, teria ido ao deserto, onde fôra tentado pelo diabo…” Dá até preguiça de digitar

Após 7 anos de solidão completa…” Ué, não eram 10?

Em dez anos de pregação (30-40 anos) teve somente um crente: seu primo.”

Ninguém o escutava. Ninguém o entendia.”

É preciso aprender a colher desprezo onde esperas carinho! Depois garfas esses malditos – tudo tem sua hora…

Com 40 anos realizou milagres…” Poxa vida, até então era só um homem comum. Plot twist nota zero!

Aos 77 anos ele teria morrido assassinado enquanto rezava no templo”

Em seu sentido mais abrangente, o gnosticismo significa <a crença na salvação pelo conhecimento> (Joan O’Grady).”

COSMOVISÃO DUALISTA

A tentativa de conciliar Jeová, o deus mau, com o do Novo Testamento.

Principais “patronos”: Marcião (marcionismo); Valentim (valentinismo ou valencionismo), Nestor (nestorianismo). Nenhum desses escapou de ser perseguido pela igreja…

Aeons, Pleroma, Demiurgo, décimo terceiro aeon, …

Pelo menos reconhece-se que a era cristã é decadente!

Os escritos joaninos são do final do 1º séc., quando nasceu o gnosticismo.” O mais ‘malvado’ dos escritores do NT.

Um rip-off do hinduísmo, em minha modesta expertise… Tanto que a maneira como os gnósticos se expressam é muito similar à minha interpretação dos Vedas: “Assim, os primeiros cristãos sabiam que 2 tipos de pessoas se achegariam ao cristianismo, um tipo sem o toque pneumático [e que tal torque? haha], e, portanto, incapaz de aproximar-se da salvação pelo conhecimento e pela sabedoria dos Mistérios, mas possuindo apenas capacidade de assimilar pela fé o lado superficial da Lei; o outro tipo, tocado pelo dom pneumático, pela centalha-espírito, que possuiria plena capacidade de assimilar os conhecimentos e a sabedoria dos Mistérios divinos e descer ao nível do profundo e espiritual da Lei, podendo gozar de completa iluminação e redenção.” Trecho de Orígenes, De Principiis

Trocando em miúdos, há duas religiões neste mundo: a dos superiores e a dos inferiores. Ou o que é mais: há a existência esotérica (Filosofia transcendental) e a exotérica (tudo o mais, filosofia ou qualquer outra coisa). “Outro patamar”… O princípio ecumênico do brâmane “em toda cultura posterior”…

Aspectos esotéricos da doutrina de Cristo: mais esotéricos do que a própria ortodoxia; mais ortodoxos do que os (maus) ortodoxos! Ver ainda mais sobre: naasenos ou ofitas; perates; sethianos; docéticos; carpocráticos; basilidianos (Basílio).

(mais conhecidos em negrito) “Com o passar do tempo, os herdeiros da tradição gnóstica e maniqueísta foram mudando de nome. Podemos indicar o aparecimento dos seguintes grupos: entre os sécs. III e IX: Euchites, Magistri Comacini, Artífices Dionisianos, Nestorianos (DV), e Eutychianos; no séc. X: Paulicianos e Bogomilos; no séc. XI: Cátharos, Patarini, Cavaleiros de Rodes, Cavaleiros de Malta, Místicos Escolásticos; [!!!] no séc. XII: Albigenses, Cavaleiros Templários, Hermetistas; no séc. XIII: a Fraternidade dos Winklers, os Beghards e Beguinen, os Irmãos do Livre Espírito, os Lollards, e os Trovadores; no séc. XIV: os Hesychastas, os Amigos de Deus, os Rosa-cruzes (Johann Valentin Andrea), os Fraticelli; no séc. XV: os Fraters Lucis, a Academia Platônica, a Sociedade Alquímica, a Sociedade da Trolha [!], os Irmãos da Boêmia (Unitas Fratrum); no séc. XVI: A Ordem de Cristo (derivada dos Templários), os Filósofos do Fogo, a Militia Crucífera Evangélica e os Ministérios dos Mestres Herméticos; no séc. XVII: os Irmãos Asiáticos (Irmãos Iniciados de São João Evangelista da Ásia), a Academia di Secreti e os Quietistas; no séc. XVIII: os Martinistas;no séc. XIX: a Sociedade Teosófica.” Teosofia é uma palavra que cheira mal…

Paulicianos como alguns dos mais persistentes e perseguidos dentre todos…

Pouco material chegou até os dias de hoje; a maioria dos personagens e suas doutrinas só pôde ser conhecida por meio dos criticos do gnosticismo. A maior polêmica contra os gnósticos apareceu no período patrístico [proto-Escolástica], com os escritos apologéticos de Irineu (130-200), Tertuliano (160-225)¹ e Hipólito (170-236).”

¹ Um dos primeiros posts do Seclusão: https://seclusao.art.blog/2017/01/30/patience-tertullian/.

Por isso a descoberta da Biblioteca de Nag Hammadi em 1945 foi de suma importância, visto que seu conteúdo é eminentemente gnóstico. O achado impulsionou as pesquisas sobre o assunto na 2ª metade do XX. Estes manuscritos totalizavam 52 textos, em 13 códices de papiro, escritos em copta. (…) 3 obras pertencentes ao Corpus Hermeticum [Códice Askew, Códice Bruce e Códice de Berlim] e 1 tradução parcial da República de Platão.”

No séc. XX, Jung pesquisou profundamente as doutrinas gnósticas, inclusive ajudando no trabalho de organização da Biblioteca de Nag Hammadi, e fez uma ligação entre os mitos gnósticos e os arquétipos do inconsciente coletivo. Escreve[u] o livro Sete sermões aos mortos sob o pseudônimo de Basilides de Alexandria, onde coloca a sua visão gnóstica em 7 textos no formato dos evangelhos.” Não sabia disso! Googlando, só encontrei um documento de 11 páginas…

Ironicamente, a-gnósticos assume uma conotação extremamente pejorativa se levarmos os gnósticos em consideração!

Nesse ramo não existe clero nem sistema de graus, sendo uma metodologia de trabalho interior.” Mas só faltava mesmo essa! Chega de clero em tudo e qualquer coisa, até nas doutrinas anticlericais!

A magia hermética passou por um renascimento no séc. XIX europeu, quando foi praticada por nomes como os envolvidos na Ordem Hermética do Amanhecer Dourado [haha] e Eliphas Levi. No séc. XX foi estudada por Franz Bardon.”

Nem tudo que é hermético é hermético (haha).

Caibalion, livro-síntese do hermetismo do século XIX.

9 9 9

O que está em cima é como o que está embaixo. E o que está embaixo é como o que está em cima.”

…God is satan deep below, satan is God high above

In the end it’s all the same…

Mercyful Fate, 9

6 6 6

Muitos historiadores consideram os Vedas os textos sobreviventes mais antigos.” Coincidência ou destino? Não há começo ou fim para a sabedoria. A vida seria um erro sem… os Vedas?!

O autor nada sabe sobre o bramanismo. Mero conhecimento linear de wikipedia!

* * *

Pode-se chamar de tradição algo que sequer monta a 70 anos (‘religião’ wicca)? Vários artigos ainda em uso do capitalismo (valor transcendental = 0) têm mais tradição do que isto!

Os dados que temos nos mostram que a maioria dos wiccanos dos dias de hoje são solitários, i.e., não participam de nenhum coven.” Hahaha! Incel ideology.

O tal do Perispírito encerra com chave de bosta a obra (engano meu, ainda havia muitas páginas desgostosas, vide abaixo). O mais chucro sobre esse “pessoal” é que eles querem transformar suas crenças sobre reencarnação e plano astral em ciência, i.e., ficam buscando sem descanso uma ratificação empírica. O cúmulo da idiotia. Assim como Nietzsche afirma que o sono é o parente mais próximo da morte, aquele que não pára de falar sobre reencarnação é o mais covarde dos acovardados diante da morte. Fale de vida ou da própria morte, ou então não fale nada – falar em reencarnar é atestar sua insignificância e falta de propósito corrente (tudo o que importa valorar).

Volto a afirmar, se já não o fiz neste blog: numa hierarquia das religiões, eu sempre posicionarei o Espiritismo no degrau mais baixo de todos. A degradação da degradação de uma degradação de uma crença original. A pior das quimeras.

Pergunto-me, aliás, quanto do texto foi redigido efetivamente pelo autor e o quanto não foi recortado diretamente de enciclopédias públicas virtuais… 70% do livro são platitudes… Como eu retirei o equivalente a 30 páginas de meras “platitudes”? Ora, um dos meus hobbies confessos é acumular conhecimentos “chatos”, superficiais, bidimensionais, sou um leitor habitual da Wikipédia, é claro! Mas afora as curios, não há qualquer valor metafísico nestas páginas!

Algumas fontes [dentro da sua cabeça] afirmam que Platão ensinava a reencarnação aos seus iniciados e a metempsicose aos leigos.”

Atenção, ainda há algumas páginas para exibição das tendências sádicas do autor!

No Liber Sententiarum Inquisitiones (Livro das Sentenças da Inquisição) o padre dominicano Bernardo Gui (Bernardus Guidonis, 1261-1331) descreveu vários métodos para obter confissões dos acusados, inclusive o enfraquecimento das forças físicas do prisioneiro.”

Roda do despedaçamento: uma roda onde o acusado era amarrado na parte externa. … Dama-de-Ferro … a 1ª ref. confiável de uma execução com a D-F data de 14/08/1515. A vítima era um falsificador de moedas”

Berço de Judas: peça metálica em forma de pirâmide sustentada por hastes. A vítima, sustentada por correntes, é colocada ‘sentada’ sobre a ponta da pirâmide. O afrouxamento gradual ou brusco da corrente manejada pelo executor fazia com que o peso do corpo pressionasse e ferisse o ânus, a vagina, o cóccix ou o saco escrotal.”

Potro … Na legislação espanhola havia uma lei que regulamentava um nº máx. de 5 voltas na manivela para que, caso a vítima fosse considerada inocente, não sofresse seqüelas irreversíveis. Mesmo assim, era comum que os carrascos, incitados pelos interrogadores, excedessem muito esse limite e a vítima tivesse a carne e os ossos esmagados.” Nem Hitler pensaria em criar um Código Penal dos Campos de Concentração. Talvez estejamos aqui diante do ápice da maldade humana…

A decapitação pela espada, por exigir uma técnica apurada do executor e ser mais suave que outros métodos, era, geralmente, reservada aos nobres.” Como filosofar com a espada!

O cadáver ficava exposto até que se desintegrasse.” Alguma dúvida de por que a Peste Negra quase exterminou o “píncaro da civilização” dos sujismundos europeus?

Cremação … Para garantir que morresse queimada e não asfixiada pela fumaça, a vítima era vestida com uma camisola embebida em enxofre” A banalidade do mal.

Hoje a Igreja ainda pode emitir um admonitum: uma advertência para o fiel, em determinados casos. É o atual modus agendi da Igreja para declarar que uma obra literária é nociva à fé. Parece inverossímil, mas o caso citado a seguir é contemporâneo (final do séc. XX). Este absurdo medieval aconteceu com o frei Leonardo Boff, um teólogo militante dos direitos humanos desde 1972. Cada livro que ele publicava era objeto de análise do Santo Ofício. Trata-se de fato recente. Ele sentou na mesma cadeira na qual sentaram Galileu Galilei e Giordano Bruno, entre outros. Lugar no qual eram e continuam sendo julgados os inquiridos, no Palácio do Vaticano, onde está tudo exatamente como antes, inclusiva [na arquitetura] a famosa Sala de Torturas.”

FREI BETTO: [O processo] até piorou, porque atualmente, depois do estabelecimento da infalibilidade do papa, nenhum réu pode ter direito à defesa; não se pode partir do princípio de que a autoridade eclesiástica errou. (…)

BOFF: (…)

FREI BETTO: Não pode pedir perdão?

BOFF: Não.

BETTO: Não pode se defender, constituir advogado…

BOFF: Não pode. Aliás, existe advogado, mas você não conhece. Você tem um adv. chamado advocatus pro autore, que não conhece, que com os cardeais faz o adv. do diabo, toma a minha defesa, mas não pode conversar comigo.

BETTO: Você pode falar ali?

BOFF: Não, só responder. E você (…) não sabe quem são os acusadores. Só conhece algumas perguntas; o cardeal é que tem todo o material, extenso, que é o documentário dele.”

AUTOR OTIMISTA! “Não obstante, graças à era da informação, aos poucos as pessoas estão se libertando desses grilhões e passando a pensar por conta própria, sem medo de questionar e nem de pesquisar.” “Só permanece na ignorância quem quer.” Kardecismo liberal: nojento! Com certeza apóia o homeschooling… Mirar diretamente o sol é o mesmo que a cegueira, senhor. Isso que eu chamo de tunnel vision: mesmo pessoas obscurantistas se crêem iluminadores em nossos tempos mesquinhos…

BLIOGRAFIA (alguns livros que me parecerem interessantes da seção final…)

4 livros de Kardec, malíssimo, malíssimo sinal!…

É, nenhuma das leituras me pareceu fundamental! Vade retro.

INTRODUCTION TO VEDANTA: Understanding the Fundamental Problem // INTRODUÇÃO AO VEDANTA: Mais próximo à filosofia ocidental do que se imagina. – Swami Dayananda, 1997.

This book is based on the opening talks given by Swami Dayananda at the start of a 3-year course in November 1979, at Piercy, California. The first text studied at this course was Tattvabodha, a simple textbook of definitions, comprising an outline of Vedanta. (…) Barbara Thornton compiled, abridged and edited the talks.”

1. AS BUSCAS HUMANAS

Os purushartha buscados pelo purusha

(Os 4 bens supremos buscados pelo homem.)

dharma ética

artha segurança (‘bem’, ‘felicidade’ ou ‘paz’ na filosofia ocidental)

kama princípio do hedonismo

moksha liberação

Artha e kama pertencem ao reino animal. A parte mais primitiva e ancestral do socius e os instintos mais básicos. Apenas o dharma e o moksa constituem buscas do homem, indivíduo, na acepção mais nobre da palavra. O homem, ou o animal super-ansioso.

Kama ou Mercúrio

Tempo condiciona o desejo [desejo stricto sensu]. Espaço condiciona o desejo. Individualidade condiciona o desejo.” Quase podemos dizer que o princípio mercurial foi enunciado no Ocidente por Kant. Seguem-se considerações no reino da Estética.

Artha ou Especificidades do homem

Sendo artha e kama as metas mais volúveis para o indivíduo, que se guia por valores mutantes, a cultura ou civilização é uma forma de tornar estes valores mais estáveis, estabelecendo um valor dos valores (prisão consensual ou condicionada).

As normas que controlam o livre-arbítrio se chamam karma.

Aqui iniciam as considerações sobre a subordinação do prazer e da segurança à ética. A primeira constatação do homem ético é: o próximo também vive (é purusha) e busca os bens supremos (purushartha). Não posso usá-lo como escada para minha auto-realização.

A fonte da ética

Se nenhum sistema ético ou ética idiossincrática é perfeito(a), há sistemas éticos que constituem medianas sociais exigentes e boas o suficiente para serem seguidas quase universalmente. A ética que deriva de escrituras sagradas de natureza remota no tempo, chamada de código religioso, é chamada no hinduísmo de dharma. Dharma estão acima de karma, porém karma é uma forma básica do dharma. O dharma é secular (deste mundo). O material de onde deriva pode ter qualquer status (secular ou sacro).

Interpretação de imperativos éticos, Falibilidade do homem e da astúcia: Lei e virtude como meios para um fim ou fim em si

Do valor destrutivo da Verdade, o imperativo ético mais difícil.

Da não-obrigatoriedade do cumprimento de tabus (vocação especial do sacerdote ou asceta), parte sagrada ou tradicional dos imperativos éticos.

O Dharma

O dharma é um misto de imperativos éticos seculares (senso comum) e fórmulas consagradas nos Vedas, com interdições e recomendações específicas para o seguidor do livro.

O que no Ocidente se costuma chamar de karma, sem conhecimento oriental, é justamente um princípio do dharma verdadeiro: o de que toda ação apresenta conseqüências, a curto, médio e longo prazo, boas ou ruins. O karma está falsamente associado, na cabeça do ocidental leigo, ao destino inexorável.

Punya é a boa ação cujos frutos podem ser imediatamente notados e colhidos. A própria prática da boa ação pode ser automatizada ou introjetada individualmente como um prazer.

Papa é a má ação cujos frutos podem ser imediatamente notados e colhidos. O Ocidente associa a expressão a pecar (e curiosamente não associa nada a punya). Papa tem a ver com a ocorrência de um futuro indesejado.

A árvore purushartha

Dharma está na copa da árvore dos purushartha, liderando em importância. Até agora a árvore parece um triângulo ou uma divisão tripartite. Foram citados apenas 3 dos bens supremos buscados. Isso tem uma motivação ulterior.

Moksha na verdade está além do dharma, mas na vida da maioria absoluta dos seres humanos não desempenha qualquer papel. Veremos adiante o quanto eu me oponho a essa “tese”… É possível levar uma vida prazenteira, feliz, confortável e mesmo ética, legítima e não-destrutiva para os outros; mas o dharma, sendo secular, possui limites bastante claros. É o limite dos bens supremos temporais. A partir de então fala-se em moksha, o que já é abstrato ou mais-que-abstrato, já que a ética é em si abstrata: supra-sensível.

Quando o corpo se torna uma prisão: Do belo & Para além da individualidade

O que Platão quer dizer com a metempsicose? A roda dos desejos.

Que tudo esteja no seu devido lugar é evidenciado pelo desejo de que nada fôra diferente do que as circunstâncias do momento.”

A vida inteira como este momento.

Todo ser humano tem a memória de já ter vivido um momento de moksha. Há correntes e há cavernas.

2. A QUESTÃO FUNDAMENTAL

A fonte do erro

Estar no meio do caminho é sempre pior que fora do caminho, para não dizer “no caminho certo”. Melhorando a analogia, saber de algo pela metade é sempre pior do que nada saber.

A auto-avaliação da inadequação

(…) Começa a adquirir um ar inopinado de auto-ajuda barata!

A busca pela perfeição via mudança

(…) Descrição modorrenta da vida do pequeno-burguês.

Valores pessoais determinam os tipos de mudança

(…)

Atitude quanto a mudanças

(…)

Ganho por mudanças pressupõe perdas

(…)

Volubilidade do prazer

(…)

Reconhecimento do problema

(…)

Análise da experiência

Finalmente algum conteúdo não-facilmente apreensível pelos adultos de 20 anos típicos (idiotas profusos): “A pessoa madura atinge o desapego (nirveda). Discerne que o incriado (infinito) não pode ser produzido pela ação.” Literalmente nenhum cristão é capaz de entender a segunda frase. O mundo enquanto mundo só tem sentido para o cristão porque é um mundo criado, com um Autor; derivado de uma Ação todo-poderosa daquele que é nossa imagem e semelhança elevadas à enésima potência.

Nesse momento o não-experimentado-o-bastante cai na tentação de contrariar a própria descoberta, e crer-se diferente só porque “descobriu” o tal “infinito”. E esse erro está sendo premeditado neste tópico pelo próprio autor! Quanto mais sabedoria, mais humildade, não é possível entender esse incriado e superar a ação, modo fundamental do homem! Em outros termos, o autor está confundindo o leitor leigo, não orientando-o bem.

A inadequação é centrada em si mesmo

Dos males o menor: essa interpretação pelo menos já desautoriza a conduta do convertido fanático que “vende todas as suas coisas” e parte seguindo Jesus… Nada ter e tudo ter são essencialmente idênticos.

O livro conceitua brahmanah como “pessoa madura”, descartando todo o racismo inevitável nos textos sagrados hindus. Não estou dizendo que não deveria fazê-lo, mas passa de largo que na literatura, e durante milênios, essa não foi uma possibilidade: ou se era da casta ariana ou os arcanos lhe estavam vedados!

He recognizes that what he really wants is a drastic change in himself, not a situational change.” Não! Como dito, o autor cai na precipitação (diria, cai no precipício) de piorar o erro, após citar o aforismo do incriado!

Noção de adequação: a norma para se auto-avaliar

A exposição retroagiu de novo para contemplar os babacas na casa dos 20. Exemplo: “One cannot consider something as bad unless one knows what is good. There is no dissatisfaction if there is no norm for satisfaction.”

“…Therefore one struggles for security and pleasure” O idiota continua querendo. O não-brâmane! Porque a noção de adequação é mais uma falsificação das aparências.

A busca direta pela liberdade a partir da inadequação

Moksha como a “senda” que leva à adequação (falso!). Mumukshu, quem busca a libertação. De nada adianta, porém, abrir um terceiro olho se ele também é cego!

Mumukshus e hedonistas: demasiado parecidos, demasiado pequenos olhados à distância, demasiado humanos…

E neste ponto, falta dharma, a ética, único campo genuíno das relações humanas (nirveda nirvana)… Mas foram 29 páginas circulares e silogísticas até aqui, num livro de apenas 120!

3. A BUSCA MADURA

A solução fútil

Resumo do capítulo anterior.

A experiência da adequação

Mais um pouco de resumo, i.e., tratamento infantil do conceito de ataraxia dos gregos antigos.

Alegria e inadequação não podem existir em mim no mesmo instante.”

Falácia. O alegre pode se sentir inadequado (o ganhador da mega-sena, que “tem tudo”, mas sabe que não tem “o que mais precisa”). Ou seu inverso, o infeliz que se sente adequado: segue a moral dos melhores, é ético, vive porém com pessoas corrompidas e inferiores. Vive da melhor maneira, mas seus vizinhos, sua sociedade, fá-lo um rematado infeliz.

Distinguindo conhecimento e experiência

Mais colocações óbvias.

Mais falácias:

  1. Experiences can be contradictory.”

Talvez falar em falácia seja exagero, mas é uma meia-afirmação inútil: experiências são, inerentemente, sempre contraditórias umas com as outras. Não é questão de possibilidade, é uma certeza inexorável.

  1. Knowledge cannot be contradicted.”

O conhecimento é apenas um raciocínio qualquer. Tanto quanto as experiências, os conhecimentos se contradizem o tempo todo. Mesmo se conhecimento = Verdade absoluta, há várias “verdades absolutas”, mais cedo ou mais tarde a filosofia e a observação da vida diária chegam a essa conclusão. E não há árbitro capaz de decidir pela preeminência de uma verdade absoluta sobre as outras. Aporia.

Parece um livro-texto furreca de psicologia dos anos 60: (p. 33) “Any given set of perceptual impressions gained from experience may or may not conform to knowledge. To qualify as knowledge they must pass the test of inquiry.” O que, uma junta de especialistas, banca monográfica?! Haha.

The questions are: Is the experience of a sun that rises in the east and sets in the west fact or not? Is this observation true? What about the polar sun that can be seen traveling in a circle? How does this observation correspond with fact?”

Knowledge: With respect to the earth the sun is stationary, neither rising nor setting nor moving in a circle” Então o conhecimento são os universais!

After inquiry and analysis, the contradictions are resolved in a true understanding” Desde que num tema já exaurido pela ciência da época.

The experiences were only mithya, apparent”

Investigação da natureza do si mesmo: atma-vicara

O sol, comparado a um si mesmo, é fixo, absoluto, mera coisa. Podemos dizer que temos um conhecimento objetivo sobre o sol. E, ao lado dessa afirmação, podemos dizer que ninguém tem um conhecimento objetivo sobre qualquer outro alguém (ao sujeito não é dado conhecer o sujeito). Sobre adequação ou inadequação de alguém. Como o Homo sapiens é primeiramente um animal crítico, dir-se-ia que “até Alexandre o Grande tinha suas inadequações”, mas que nos confins da Terra acharemos um “perfeito inadequado”. Por mais que queiramos, Bolsonaro, p.ex., ainda é costumeiramente adequado, até endeusado (absolutizado!) por muitos “seres humanos” (não-brâmanes)…

A investigação necessária para resolver a questão particular da auto-adequação é chamada atma-vicara. Atma significando ‘eu’ ou si mesmo, e vicara atendendo por pesquisa, inquérito, investigação.”

O tópico deve ser mantido em aberto.” Ó!

O que se tenta aqui não é resolver uma equação de segundo grau, rapazes, é um pouco mais complexo que isso!

Análise da busca pela adequação

Repetição.

A busca pela adequação é universal e não está em poder de ninguém desistir”

Repetição (cita mumukshu duas vezes, nada conclui).

A natureza da realização

Mudança de situação, mudança de lugar, passagem do tempo são relevantes somente para aquilo que é limitado.” Bom, aqui pelo menos refuta-se o além cristão. Não há redenção à morte (futuro temporal máximo do ponto de vista individual).

A conquista do já-realizado

(…)

Liberdade da inadequação: uma meta já consumada

The first 3 human goals, dharma, artha, kama, the ethical pursuit of sec…” Grave erro. Quando foi que o ser humano incipiente buscou ética? Jamais!

Inquiry into the nature of adequacy shows that this is the only category in which we can put moksha.” Desisto desse livro.

A busca madura

Grosso modo, podemos reduzir o dito à p. 43 como: “sou burro, doravante busco conhecimento”. Nada que Sócrates-Platão não tenham ensinado com palavras muito mais poéticas.

An informed mumukshu is called a jimasu Mas o mumukshu já não era “informado” (maduro)?

mumu… busca liberdade

jima… busca conhecimento

Many examples can be found in almost all religions of severe, painful, and sometimes strange practices undertaken for the sake of deliverance from limitation.” (mumu) Muitas, inclusive o próprio asceta hindu. O Código de Manu está inteiramente informado, para usar um trocadilho, desses casos.

A progressiva decadência (auto-retirada do mundo da ação) do homem…

This inquiry into the self which leads to discovery of the nature of oneself is called Vedanta.” Charlatanismo. Não o Vedanta, mas esta palestra.

4. IGNORÂNCIA E CONHECIMENTO

Vejam os subtítulos de mais este capítulo inecessário e “circular”, para “pegar leve”:

Todos nascem ignorantes

A desfolhação da ignorância

Conexões: sambandha

Objetos são conhecidos via percepção

Os meios para conhecer devem ser adequados

Inferências são baseadas na percepção

Conhecimento intelectual é conhecimento inferencial

O conhecimento é incriado [Platão já esteve aqui, etc., etc.]

Conhecimento válido

Percepção é inútil para o auto-conhecimento

A necessidade do auto-conhecimento

Os meios de obtenção do auto-conhecimento

Para o auto-conhecimento, procure um guru qualificado [mero esquema de pirâmide milenar]

Conhecimento indireto e direto via palavras

As palavras do guru dão o conhecimento direto do si mesmo

Chuva de lugares comuns. Creio, por bem, que devamos parar por aqui! Aquele que necessita de um guru não pode “ser salvo”, muito menos “salvar-se a si mesmo”…

50 CLASSIC PHILOSOPHY BOOKS – Parte 1: O Sentido Trágico da Vida (Unamuno)

  1. THE CONDITIONS OF EXISTENCE AS AFFECTING THE PERPETUATION OF LIVING BEINGS – Thomas Huxley

if there were no men there would be no tape-worms.”

Malthus nunca foi refutado e jamais será”

  1. TRAGIC SENSE OF LIFE – Miguel de Unamuno, com longo prefácio de S. de Madariaga

TÍTULO DE LIVRO AFORISMÁTICO: Todas as notas de rodapé que você nunca leu.

(*) “Unamuno, como criador, não tem nada dos fracassos desses artistas que nunca sentiram profundamente. Mas ele mostra as limitações desses artistas que não conseguem serenar.”

(*) “O senso da forma é altamente simpático ao elemento feminino na natureza humana, e a raça basca é altamente masculina.”

(*) “Luzbel, the Angel Of denying nothingness, endlessly falling – Bottom he ne’er can touch”

(*) “Versos brancos nunca são o melhor meio para os poetas de uma forte inspiração masculina.”

(*) “A corruptible organism could not hate as I hated.”

(*) “A extrema limitação no emprego de detalhes fisionômicos de que Unamuno fez sua marca registrada em seu trabalho criativo pode ter levado seus críticos a esquecer a intensidade daqueles – admiravelmente escolhidos – que são dados.”

(*) “ele nunca grita.”

(*) “Na Rússia, Dosto. e Tolstoy escolhem o lado Leste enquanto Turgeniev se torna o advogado do Ocidente.” Unamuno é nosso Dostoievsky” Então a literatura basca é mesmo pobre.

* * *

Um homem pega um bonde elétrico para escutar uma ópera, e se pergunta, Qual, nesse caso, é o mais útil, o bonde ou a ópera?”

Vi com mais freqüência um gato usar a razão do que rir ou chorar. Talvez ele chore ou ria internamente – mas então, talvez também internamente, um caranguejo resolva equações de segundo grau.”

depois de ter examinado e pulverizado com sua análise as provas tradicionais da existência de Deus, do Deus Aristotélico, que é o Deus correspondente ao _zoon politikon_, o Deus abstrato, o imóvel primo Movedor, Kant reconstrói Deus do zero – o Deus Luterano, em resumo.” As cambalhotas críticas de K.

para sustentar a imortalidade da alma Deus é introduzido. Todo o resto é a conciliação do profissional da filosofia.”

Infinitamente, nosso único eu só luta pelo infinito.

Desde sempre e para sempre, o homem só quer viver para sempre.

so he had God-ache. Unhappy man! And unhappy fellow-men!”

poeta e filósofo são irmãos gêmeos, se é que não um e o mesmo”

The man of Fichte, o eu de Fichte, o feixe de Eu, a pesca da verdade e individualidade pelo fio do anzol, de cada um o Homem, de cada Ingente e Protuberante Ser o Eu pungente: doeu – ai! Ass: Fichtício

Querer ser outro alguém: “It has been said that every man who has suffered misfortunes prefers to be himself, even with his misfortunes, rather than to be someone else without them.”


OI & TCHAU

Eu não vou retroceder porque eu não (desisto) cedo.

Eu só vou avançar reto

Andar de braços com a alva morte

Contar piada, memori(a)zar as coisas passadas não-ano(i)tadas


Quem recebe o fruto desse sacrifício?”

Os dias de semana são o meu calvário (e são vários!) e os fins de semana meu Além Paradisíaco Finito (logo, inexistentes).

A meta é sempre…

Se a consciência é, como certo pensador inumano disse, nada mais do que um lampejo de luz entre duas eternidades de escuridão, então não há nada mais execrável que a existência.” não deixa de ser um trocadilho genial e risível

Há vezes em que mesmo um axioma pode se tornar uma impertinência.”

Lágrimas de crocodilo eu não vou chorar.

The chiefest sanctity of a temple is that it is a place to which men go to weep in common. A miserere sung in common by a multitude tormented by destiny has as much value as philosophy.”


PAPO DE BOTECO SOBRE O DESTINO

Deus tem que se submeter à lei lógica da contradição, e Ele não pode, de acordo com os teólogos, fazer com que dois e dois sejam mais ou menos do que quatro. Ou a lei da necessidade está acima d’Ele ou Ele Mesmo é a lei da necessidade. E na ordem moral a questão que desponta é saber se falsidade, ou homicídio, ou adultério, são errados porque Ele assim o decretou, ou se Ele assim o decretou porque são errados. Se a resposta é a primeira, então Deus é um Deus caprichoso e insensato, que decreta uma lei quando Ele poderia igualmente ter decretado outra, ou, se a resposta é a última, Ele obedece a uma natureza e essência intrínsecas que existem nas coisas mesmas independentemente d’Ele — isto é, independentemente de Sua vontade soberana; e se é este o caso, se Ele obedece à razão inata das coisas, essa razão, se pudéssemos ao menos sabê-la, nos bastaria, sem qualquer necessidade ulterior de Deus, e já que não sabemo-la, Deus não explica nada. Essa razão estaria além de Deus. (…) E é por causa desse problema das relações entre a razão de Deus, necessariamente necessária, e Sua vontade, necessariamente livre, que o Deus lógico e aristotélico será sempre um Deus contraditório.”

Deus é indefinível. Procurar defini-Lo é procurar confiná-Lo nos limites de nossa mente — isto é, matá-Lo. Enquanto procurarmos defini-Lo, aí ergue-se diante de nós — o Nada.”

* * *

All or nothing! And what other meaning can the Shakespearean <To be or not to be> have, or that passage in Coriolanus where it is said of Marcius <He wants nothing of a god but eternity>? (…) Nothing is real that is not eternal.”

Everything passes! Such is the refrain of those who’ve tasted of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.”

Um amigo meu me confessou que, antevendo do auge do vigor físico a aproximação de uma morte violenta, ele se propôs a concentrar sua vida e passar seus poucos dias que ele calculou que ainda teria para escrever um livro. Vaidade das vaidades!


UM DOS AFORISMOS MAIS PATÉTICOS DA HISTÓRIA HUMANA:
Aí você tem esse <ladrão de energias>, como ele [Nie.] tão obtusamente chamava Cristo que buscou casar niilismo e esforço pela existência, e ele fala sobre coragem. Seu coração anelava o eterno enquanto sua cabeça o convencia do nada, e, desesperado e louco para se defender de si mesmo, ele amaldiçoou aquilo que mais amava. Já que não podia ser Cristo, ele blasfemava contra Cristo. Atacando a si mesmo, ele se desejava sem-fim e sonhava com sua teoria do eterno retorno, uma lamentável falsificação da imortalidade, e, cheio de pena de si mesmo, ele abominava a compaixão. E alguns há que dizem que dele é a filosofia dos homens fortes! Não, não é. Minha saúde e minha força me impelem a me perpetuar. [?] Sua doutrina é a doutrina dos fracotes que aspiram a ser fortes, mas não dos fortes que são fortes. [?] Só os enfermos se entregam à morte final [?] e substituem a espera pela imortalidade pessoal por algum outro desejo. [Ah, os últimos homens! Unamunos demoram a passar pelo mundo, mas sim, também eles passam.] No forte, o zelo pela perpetuidade [?] supera a dúvida de realizá-la, [R.I.P. Unamuno] e sua superabundância de vida [?] inunda o outro lado da morte [??? – tornou-se um peixe capaz de respirar debaixo d’água, superabundantemente?].”

O homem de letras que contar-lhe que despreza a fama é um sonso mentiroso.” “Precisamos que outros acreditem em nossa superioridade para que nela acreditemos nos próprios, e sobre sua crença basear nossa fé em nossa própria persistência, ou pelo menos na persistência de nossa fama.”

Pergunte a qualquer artista sincero o que ele preferiria, que seu trabalho perecesse e sua memória sobrevivesse, ou que seu trabalho sobrevivesse e sua memória perecesse, e você verá o que ele irá dizer-lhe, se ele é mesmo sincero [??].” Mil vezes meu trabalho. Ele é anônimo.

<Posteridade é uma acumulação de minorias,> disse Gounod.¹ Ele prefere se prolongar no tempo do que no espaço [outra tolice].”

¹ Compositor clássico.

Erwin Rohde – Psyche (fav.)

Melanchton – Loci Communes (1ª obra protestante)

And I have read in a Protestant theologian, Ernst Troeltsch, that in the conceptual order Protestantism has attained its highest reach in music in which art Bach has given it its mightiest artistic expression. Thus, then, is what Protestantism dissolves into – celestial music!”

Já o catolicismo…the Christ of Vélasquez [link imagem], that Chr. who is forever dying, yet never finishes dying, in order that he may give us life.”

No me mueve, Dios, para quererte el cielo que me tienes prometido”

And why be scandalized by the infallibility of a man, of the Pope? What difference does it make wether it be a book that is infallible — the Bible –, or a single man?” “Pius IX, the 1st Pontiff to be proclaimed infallible, declared that he was irreconcilable with the so-called modern civilization.”

t(ra)di(tionalism)

The Trinity was a kind of pact between the monotheism and polytheism, and humanity and divinity sealed a peace in Christ”

Ninguém está mais propenso a acreditar tão pouco quanto aqueles que começaram acreditando demais.”

to say that everything is God, and that when we die we return to God, or, more accurately, continue in Him, avails our longing nothing; for if this indeed be so, then we were in God before we were born, and if when we die we return to where we were before being born, then the human soul, the individual consciousness, is perishable. And since we know very well that God, the personal and conscious God of Christian monotheism, is simply the provider, and above all the guarantor of our immortality, pantheism is said and rightly said, to be merely atheism disguised; and, in my opinion, undisguised. And they were right in calling Spinoza an atheist, for his is the most logical, the most rational, system of pantheism.”

Essa última proposição – le bonheur fait partie de la verité é uma proposição de pura advocacia, mas não de ciência ou de razão pura. (…) – credo quia absurdum, que significa na verdade _credo quia consolans_ — eu acredito porque é algo consolador para mim.”

Os deuses não mais sendo e Cristo não sendo ainda, havia entre Cícero e Marco Aurélio um momento único no qual o homem esteve sozinho. Em nenhum outro lugar eu acho essa grandeza; mas o que torna Lucrécio intolerável é sua física, que ele dá como positiva. Se ele é fraco, é porque não duvidou o bastante; ele desejava explicar, chegar a uma conclusão!”

Flaubert

A dúvida metódica de Descartes é uma dúvida cômica, uma dúvida puramente teórica e provisória – quer dizer, a dúvida de um homem que age como se duvidasse sem realmente duvidar.” “essa dúvida cartesiana excogitada num fogão”

Sufro yo a tu costa, Dios no existente, pues si tú existiras existiría yo también de veras” nota 35

Faith, some say, consists in not thinking about it (…) Yes, but infidelity also consists in not thinking about it.”

E no que concerne àquele ditado abjeto e ignóbil: <Se não houvera um Deus, seria necessário inventá-Lo,> não devemos dizer nada. É a expressão do ceticismo sujo daqueles conservadores que vêem a religião meramente como um meio de governo e cujo interesse reside em que na outra vida deva existir um inferno para aqueles que se opõem a suas ambições mundanas nesta vida. Essa frase repugnante e saducéia é digna do cético servidor-do-temporal a quem ela é atribuída.”

E não é em vão [ironicamente] que repetimos ainda uma vez mais as mesmas eternas lamentações que já eram velhas nos tempos de Jó e do Eclesiastes, e até repetimos tudo nas mesmas palavras, só para fazer os devotos do progresso verem que há algo que nunca morre. Quem quer que repita a <Vaidade das Vaidades> do Eclesiastes ou as lamentações de Jó, ainda que sem mudar um <a>, tendo-as experimentado n’alma, executa um trabalho de admoestação. Preciso é repetir sem cessar a ladainha do memento mori.”

hoje, no séc. XX, todos os séculos idos e todos eles vivos, ainda subsistem.”

Pobre rapaz! se ele ao menos usasse sua inteligência para melhores propósitos!…”

E se os pedaços de um tabuleiro de xadrez fossem dotados de consciência, teriam provavelmente poucos problemas em atribuir livre-arbítrio a seus movimentos – ou seja, clamar-se-iam uma racionalidade finalista.”

Is there really anything strange in the fact that the deepest religious feeling has condemned carnal love and exalted virginity?” “A mulher se entrega ao amante porque sente que seu desejo o faz sofrer. Isabel tem compaixão por Lourenço, Julieta por Romeu, Francesca por Paolo. A mulher parece dizer: <Venha, pobre alma, tu não deves sofrer tanto por minha causa!>. E portanto seu amor é mais amoroso e puro que o do homem, mais bravo e mais resistente.” Nessun maggior dolore che ricordarsi del tempo felice nella miseria are the words that Dante puts into the mouth of Francesca da Rimini (Inferno, V., 121-123).”

<The bitterest sorrow that man can know is to aspire to do much and to achieve nothing> (_polla phroneoita mêdenos chrateein_) – so Herodotus relates that a Persian said to a Theban at a banquet (book ix., chap. xvi.). And it is true.”

.0 (PONTO ZERO)

A mesma mente que formulou a noção do nada havia necessariamente de pensar e pinçar o conceito de ponto, o enunciado-mor da matemática, “a” ciência niilista. Pois considerando tudo o que há, só o que não pode haver seriam o vazio e o ponto. Na verdade um é o desdobramento lógico do outro. De um ponto (singularidade metafísica) estão excluídos tempo e espaço. Presente, mais conhecido como ponto, ou negação de todas as negações ou zero dos zeros.

Gravidade negativa é negar a verdade… viva, viva, viva!

IRREVERSÍVEL

Ainda cremos que possa haver um retorno, uma reconciliação. Mas a morte do outro encerra essa esperança. Por exemplo: não choro nem fico de luto se meu pai perde uma perna ou envelhece. Muito menos quando envelhece, pois esse é um processo gradual. Mas arrebento em lágrimas se no telefone dizem: o velho acaba de falecer. Infelizmente forte ou fraco ninguém está imune.

Zeus, Júpiter, estava em processo de ser convertido em um deus único, assim como Jahwé originalmente um deus entre tantos outros, veio a se converter em deus único, primeiro o deus do povo de Israel, depois o deus da humanidade, e finalmente o deus de todo o universo.”

O Deus lógico, racional, o ens summum, o primum movens, o Ser Supremo da filosofia teológica, o Deus que é atingido pelos três famosos caminhos da negação, eminência e causalidade, _viae negationis, eminentiae, causalitatis_, não é nada senão uma idéia de Deus, uma coisa morta. As provas de sua existência são, no fundo, meramente uma vã tentativa para determinar sua essência; porque como Vinet observou tão bem, a existência é deduzida da essência; e dizer que Deus existe, sem dizer o que é Deus e como ele é, é o equivalente a não dizer absolutamente nada.”

Laplace is said to have stated that he had not found the hypothesis of God necessary in order to construct his scheme of the origin of the Universe, and it is very true. In no way whatever does the idea of God help us to understand better the existence, the essence and the finality of the Universe. That there is a Supreme Being, infinite, absolute and eternal, whose existence is unknown to us, and who has created the Universe, is not more conceivable than that the material basis of the Universe itself, its matter, is eternal and infinite and absolute.” “For to say that the world is as it is and not otherwise because God made it so, while at the same time we do not know for what reason He made it so, is to say nothing. And if we know for what reason God made it so, then God is superfluous and the reasons itself suffices.”

Hoje estou alegre como nunca. Dia 6/10/15 foi um dia perfeito. Para o passado, para o presente, para o futuro. Super-energizado, tranquilo, sortudo, posudo e sereno. Ontem vi batalhas contra Piccolo Daimao na tela grande em Dragon Ball, e um tanto de pornografia. O universo se refez na luta laboral de Goku, a Tabatha veio trabalhar conosco e eu corri feito um pápa-léguas. Choveu e eu olhei atento pela janela do ônibus. Ah, ufa, já não estou mais gripado. Nesses dias, escassamente, é que desejamos ser imortais. O machucado no meu joanete por causa da minha chinela nem incomodou. Os maus presságios futebolísticos, tampouco. Dane-se a religião denominada Corinthianismo! A Brenda poderia até desligar o whatsapp na minha cara. Hoje, excepcionalmente, eu sou um fumante confiante.

Assinado: Zezé diCdoce

Those who say that they believe in God and yet neither love nor fear Him, do not in fact believe in Him but in those who have taught them that God exists, and these in their turn often enough do not believe in Him either.”

God wills that the heart should have rest, but not the head, reversing the order of the physical life in which the head sleeps and rests at times while the heart wakes and works unceasingly.”

Entre a poesia e a religião a sabedoria de viver encena sua comédia. Todo indivíduo que não vive quer poética quer religiosamente é um tolo”

Kierkegaard

From the subterranean ore [praying] of memory we extract the jewelled visions of our future (…) And humanity is like a young girl full of longings” “there is no kinder wish than that when the winter of life shall come it may find the sweet dreams of its spring into memories sweeter still”

CRUCIFICADO À MEIA-NOITE

in Christ human race sublimated its hunger for eternity” eternamente?

sublimação: sempre temporária; sempre?

temporariamente eterno enquanto dure depois que acabe e permaneça como cicatriz até sarar de nascença

muito infantil para compreender coisas de adulto

muito adulto para compreender criancices

mas, engraçado, só o adolescente não se entende!

A cidade de pedra branca onde tudo transcorre tão bem é Roma!

os meios justificam a agonia tenebrosa

ressubluminados pelo sistema!

Just as truth is the goal of rational knowledge, so beauty is the goal of hope, which is perhaps in its essence irrational.” “Nothing is lost, nothing wholly passes away, for in some way or another everything is perpetuated” Desde que o Sol circunda a terra ou a Terra circunda o sol, voltamos a Ele, rodamos felizes no anel e você sabe mais o quê!

Every impression that reached me remains stored up in my brain even though it may be so deep or so weak that it is buried in the dephts of my subconsciousness; but from these depths it animates my life” quando você é leitor de alguém mesmo contra sua vontade

beauty springs from compassion and is simply the temporal consolation that compassion seeks. A tragic consolation!” estou sonolento

Hope in action is charity, and beauty in action is goodness.”

Whosoever knows not the Son will never know the Father, and the Father is only known through the Son (…) the Son of Man”

What is Fate, what is Fatality, but the brotherhood of love and suffering?”

Have you never felt the horrible terror of feeling yourself incapable of suffering and of tears?”

And the reader will no doubt think that this idea of suffering can have only a metaphorical value when applied to God, similar to that which is supposed to attach to those passages in the Old Testament which describe the human passions of the God of Israel.”

<Brother Wolf> St. Francis of Assisi called the poor wolf that feels a painful hunger for the sheep, and feels, too, perhaps, the pain of having to devour them”

The face can only see itself when portrayed in the mirror, but in order to see itself it must remain the prisoner of the mirror in which it sees itself, and the image which it sees therein is as the mirror distorts it; and if the mirror breaks, the image is broken; and if the mirror is blurred, the image is blurred.”

pelo espelho somos fascinados na esperança de poder atravessá-lo em pêlo.

A origem do mal, como muitos já descobriram no passado, não é senão o que é chamado pelo outro nome <a inércia da matéria>, e, ao ser aplicada às coisas do espírito, <a preguiça>.”

nuca em pêlo

pêlo em ovo

lá de baixo

no homem sempre tem

o difícil é não achar

a chave para o sofrimento

e a preocupação

está na cera quente

cera ou não-cera eis a

questão

eis o quentão

a suprema preguiça é a de não aspirar loucamente à imortalidade.”

ponta-cabeça: “And many of those who seem to be the greatest egoists, trampling everything under their feet in their zeal to bring their work to a successful issue, are in reality men whose souls are aflame and overflowing with charity, for they subject and subordinate their petty personality to the sociality that has a mission to accomplish.”

volição rubro-negra

d’em tudo embarcar

e abarcar

e açambarcar


a·po·ca·tás·ta·se

substantivo feminino

[Teologia] Doutrina herética segundo a qual, no fim dos tempos, serão admitidas ao Paraíso todas as almas, inclusive a do Diabo.

in Dicionário Priberam da Língua Portuguesa

[consultado em 16-11-2015]


he, the Roman, describes the Jews as a people dominated by superstition and hostile to religion, _gens superstitioni obnoxia, religionibus adversa_

<He who possesses science and art, has religion; he who possesses neither science nor art, let him get religion,> said Goethe in one of his frequent accesses of paganism. And yet in spite of what he said, he himself, Goethe…?” Traduzi essa frase lendo Hegel. Unamuno nada entendeu de G.

Behold, we have forsaken all and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?” Pedro

o Universo é mulher. E assim foi na Alemanha, na França, na Provença, na Espanha, na Itália, e no princípio da idade moderna.”

Francesco de Sanctis, Storia della Letteratura italiana

o que foi a Cavalaria senão um híbrido entre paganismo e Cristianismo, cujo Livro seria talvez a lenda de Tristão e Isolda?”

A Europa afluiu para a Universidade de Bolonha em busca de aprendizado. A Cavalaria foi sucedida pelo Platonismo. (…) Mas a razão foi realmente para salvar a vida, o que os homens já buscaram salvar em seus cultos da mulher.”

doctrines such as spiritualism, metempsychosis, the transmigration of the souls from star to star, [interpretações não-autorizadas de Pl.] and the like; doctrines which as often as they are pronounced to be defeated and dead, are found to have come to life again, clothed in some more or less new form. And it is merely supine to be content to ignore them and not to seek to discover their permanent and living essence.”

<Calypso was inconsolable at the departure of Ulysses; in her sorrow she was dismayed at being immortal,> said the gentle, the mystical Fénelon at the beginning of his _Télémaque_. Was it not a kind of doom that the ancient gods, no less than the demons, were subject to—the deprivation of the power to commit suicide?”

– Eu não posso me matar, não está escrito!

– Por quê?!

– Porque eu sou DEUS!

though the other life may exclude space, it cannot exclude time, as Cournot observes”

Swedenborg remarked that the angels change, because angels, like men, love themselves, and he who loves himself experiences changes of state”

He who sees God shall die, say the Scriptures (Judg. 13:22); and may it not be that the eternal vision of God is an eternal death?”

MADRUGADA PÓ DE ESTRELAS

Todos os meus dias são completos, e de alguma forma eu sou a vida de alguém sedento pela Imortalidade que pediu ao gênio da Lâmpada essa existência contínua, perfeita, acabada, múltipla, total, infinita mesmo: cada dia é uma existência, do início ao fim. Eu nasço, cresço, reproduzindo-me ou não, e morro.

Quem na idade de oitenta se lembra da criança que era aos oito, por mais consciente que seja da cadeia inquebrantável que une a ambas?”

Herculísifo

Novamente o mal-entendido circula entre as línguas dos vários tempos e lugares (P. 8456-8457): “Sêneca, o Espanhol, a isso deu expressão no seu Consolatio ad Marciam (xxvi.); o que ele desejava era viver essa vida de novo: ista moliri. E o que pedia (19:25-7) era para ver Deus em carne, não em espírito. E o quê, senão isso, é o significado daquela cômica concepção do eterno retorno que saiu da trágica alma do pobre Nietzsche, faminta por imortalidade concreta e temporal?”

A MINHA grande pergunta seria: quem não sabe o que está escrevendo, deveria ainda assim continuar escrevendo? Sempre é possível calar, bloquear!

The majority of suiciders would not take their lives if they had the assurance that they would never die on this Earth. The self-slayer kills himself because he will not wait for death.”

SUICÍDIO SE JOGANDO DA JANELA (2009)

No parapeito da janela, de costas: o <em vão> clamava… Mas o que seria uma Jade Barbosa, um Michael Schumacher, uma Menina de Ouro presos eternamente em seu estado impotente? Pior do que o suplício eterno da alma de todos os Livros Sagrados. Ou então: suprema consolação: já que eu vou morrer mesmo… por que aqui e agora? O que estarei perdendo, se o futuro for melhor? Se for pior?!… Sei eu – pior do que isto aqui?? Com a coluna quebrada, voluntariamente, com opróbrio máximo? Certamente que não! Fé… na minha melhora, ainda que pouca e relutante.

Vamos viver amanhã, e depois concluiremos se vale(ria) a pena se suicidar hoje.

Já valeu? Não que eu saiba.

Então estamos no caminho certo.

Um suicídio INCONSCIENTE. Portanto, algo inexistente.

The rationalist beatitude did not ever satisfy or deceive even a Spinoza.”

in that case the Universe would be infinite, and in reality we are unable to conceive a Universe that is both eternal and limited such as that which served as the basis of Nietzsche’s theory of eternal recurrence.” “But as far as our own world is concerned, its gradual death appears to be proved. (…) May it be that consciousness and its extended support are two powers in contraposition, the one growing at the expense of the other?”

Leopardi, that Christian atheist” “A Natureza nos dá a vida como uma mãe, mas nos ama como uma madrasta.”

Is the sadness of the field in the fields themselves or in us who look upon them?” Elucubrações dementes e mambembes do nosso amiguinho Una…

what is an infinite consciousness? Since consciousness supposes limitation, or rather since consciousness is consciousness of limitation, of distinction, does it not thereby exclude infinitude?”

eternal rope hurting our hands

May it not be that in the end all shall be saved, including Cain and Judas and Satan himself, as Origen’s development of the Pauline apocatastasis led him to hope?”

eternal punishment is a meaningless phrase.”

hell has been conceived as a sort of police institution, necessary in order to put fear into the world. And the worst of it is that it no longer intimidates, and therefore will have to be shut up.”

Franklin, who believed in another life, asserted that he was willing to live this life over again, the life that he had actually lived, <from its beginning to the end>; while Leopardi, who did not believe in another life, asserted that nobody would consent to live his life over again.”

What cruelty is there in denying to a man that which he did not or could not desire?”

a man mean mad

that the Christian, mystical, inward longing ever since St. Paul, has been to give human finality, or divine finality, to the Universe, to save human consciousness, and to save it by converting all humanity into a person. This longing is expressed in the anacefaleosis, the gathering together of all things, all things in earth and in heaven, the visible and the invisible, in Christ, and also in the apocatastasis, the return of all things to God, to consciousness, in order that God may be all in all. And does not God’s being all in all mean that all things shall acquire consciousness and that in this consciousness everything that has happened will come to life again, and that everything that has existed in time will be eternalized?”

P. 8488: Nice <agnostic> poetry: “And the soul, my soul at least, longs for something else, not absorption, not quietude, not peace, not appeasement, it longs ever to approach and never to arrive, it longs for a never-ending longing, for an eternal hope which is eternally renewed but never wholly fulfilled.”

Do not write upon the gate of heaven that sentence which Dante placed over the threshold of hell, _Lasciate ogni speranza!_ Do not destroy time! Our life is a hope which is continually converting itself into memory” “An eternal purgatory, then, rather than a heaven of glory”

Is there perhaps any greater joy than that of remembering misery in time of felicity? Does not the prison haunt the freed prisoner?”

Christianity, the only religion which we Euro[PEONS] of the 20th century are really capable of feeling, is, as Kierkegaard said, a desperate sortie (Afsluttende uvidenskabelig Efterskrift, ii., i., cap. i.), a sortie which can be successful only by means of the martyrdom of faith, which is, according to this same tragic thinker, the crucifixion of reason”

vamos [es]capar os hábeis!

Castrate Alves

treat all veins

if it be that nothingness is the fate that awaits us we must not so act that it shall be a just fate.” Senancour, Obermann

Ele está na base daquele vale buscando o conflito interior!

ansieDIEde, a doença do século. Morrer de esperar morrer sem ter o que fazer… dadieísmo

The man who does not really know why he acts as he does and not otherwise, feels the necessity of explaining to himself the motive of his action and so he forges a motive.”


heart composed with earth

earthly heartly in heaven

chantilly

bow splendidly


it is not faith that creates martyrs but martyrs who create faith.”

CARTILHA NEOLIBERAL:Act so that in your own judgement and in the judgement of others you may merit eternity, act so that you may become irreplaceable, act so that you may not merit death. Or perhaps thus: Act as if you were to die to-morrow, but to die in order to survive and be eternalized. The end of morality is to give personal, human finality to the Universe; to discover the finality that belongs to it—if indeed it has any finality—and to discover it by acting.”


All that has achieved existence deserves to be destroyed”

Denn alles was Ensteht ist wert doss es zugrunde geht”

— Mefistófeles


Mephistopheles asserts that everything that exists deserves to be destroyed, annihilated, but not that everything will be destroyed or annihilated”

Indeed, it is scarcely possible to form a clear idea as to what pessimism really is.”

The despair which finds a voice is a social mood”

The real despair writes no books”

Wir sind nicht auf der Welt, um glücklich zu sein, sondern um unsere Schuldigkeit zu tun” “Não estamos no mundo para sermos felizes, mas para cumprirmos nossas obrigações [para sermos ou nos sentirmos culpados, como a etimologia de Schuldigkeit mostrará]

The intellectual world is divided into two classes—dilettanti on the one hand, and pedants on the other.” Veja abaixo a retomada do assunto.

Our greatest endeavor must be to make ourselves irreplaceable” Unamuno passou tanto tempo ocupado criticando o Eterno Retorno que não percebeu que compactuava em tudo com ele. “And to act in such a way as to make our annihilation an injustice, in such a way as to make our brothers, our sons, and our brothers’ sons, and their sons’ sons, feel that we ought not to have died, is something that is within the reach of all.”

Ah, ela estava sofrendo muito. Tinha que ter morrido mesmo, foi um conforto para ela!” The Ant

he, because he was sinless, did not deserve to have died” Não sou um samba, mas vim só para deixar saudade…

#TÍTULO DE LIVRO? Enclísico, o último dos filósofos.

If we could but enter into the cloister and examine the religious vocation of those whom the self-interest of their parents had forced as children into a novice’s cell and who had suddenly awakened to the life of the world—if indeed they ever do awake!—or of those whom their own self-delusions had led into it!”

just as the Apostle exclaimed, <I am a Roman citizen!> each one of us, even the atheist, might exclaim <I am a Christian!>” “this demands the civilizing of Christianity, which was Luther’s task, although he himself eventually became the founder of a Church.”

This question of the proper vocation is possibly the gravest and most deep-seated of social problems, that which is at the root of all the others. That which is known par excellence as the social question is perhaps not so much a problem of the distribution of wealth, of the products of labour, as a problem of the distribution of avocations, of the modes of production.”

TESTE VOCACIONAL PARA A VIDA – E SE OSCAR NIEMEYER O FIZESSE AOS 101 ANOS E REPROVASSE?

the workman works with the consciousness, not of the uselessness merely, but of the social perversity, of his work, manufacturing the poison that will kill him” e eu nem sou farmacêutico!


THE BALDE

the ball of life is bad and bald

debalde


Fragmentos de uma metalinguagem (CAPES 7-1-2016 12:09): “And do you not know cases in which a man, justifying his action on the ground that the professional organism to which he belongs and in which he works is badly organized and does not function as it ought, will evade the strict performance of his duty on the pretext that he is thereby fulfilling a higher duty?” mas eu poderia estar almoçando, e estou aqui me sacrificando pelos meus entes queridos!

There is nothing worse than a loaded pistol which nobody uses left lying in some corner of the house; a child finds it, begins to play with it, and kills its own father.”

arranging the bed for the sake of arranging it – mother’s philosophy

getting milk for the sake of getting it

without a single crisis

when he is <dead to them,> not merely <dead>” venceu na vida

he (s)ought to live

meu barbeiro morreu” “meu escritor de cabeceira morreu” Pelé nunca deveria morrer etc.

Often the employer finds it almost impossible to dismiss an inefficient workman on account of his inefficiency, for his fellow-workers take his part. Their work, moreover, is often perfunctory [A Mosca Perfunctória & Outras Estórias], performed merely as a pretext for receiving a wage” Pagar o santo e oco pedágio de cada dia… o tempedágio – vamos despertar hoje porque a nota técnica não irá se fazer sozinha! Ou daqui a pouco… irá!

There is scarcely a single servant of the State who feels the religious bearing of his official and public duties.”

And how, in fact, would man have passed his time in Paradise if he had had no work to do in keeping it in order?”

QUANDO UNAMUNO VAI LONGE DEMAIS:there is much more humanity in war than in peace. (…) War is the school of fraternity and the bond of love; it is war that has brought peoples into touch with one another” “Human love knows no purer embrace, or one more fruitful in its consequences, than that between victor and vanquished on the battlefield. And even the purified hate that springs from war is fruitful. War is, in its strictest sense, the sanctification of homicide; Cain is redeemed as a leader of armies. And if Cain had not killed his brother Abel, perhaps he would have died by the hand of Abel.#PAZ “God revealed Himself above all in war; He began by being the God of battles” Tudo começa com Ares. “the State, the child of war.” “It was slavery that enabled Plato to speculate upon the ideal republic, [será?] and it was war that brought slavery about. Not without reason was Athena the goddess of war and of wisdom. But is there any need to repeat once again these obvious truths, which, though they have continually been forgotten, are continually rediscovered?

Rometa et Julieu

this repellent ethic of anarchic individualism: each one for himself.” Cada Robinson Crusoé na sua ilha.

true charity is a kind of invasion”

Whosoever loves thee dearly will make thee weep” Autor desconhecido

O amor que não mortifica não merece um nome tão divino” Tomé de Jesus

O fogo só queima porque a carne é combustível.

A cura para o sofrimento é sofrer mais. (…) Não fume ópio, mas ponha sal e vinagre na ferida da alma, porque quando você dorme e não mais sofre, você não mais é.” So Nietzschean! “Então, não feche os olhos para a agonizante Esfinge, mas olhe-a na cara e deixe-a agarrá-lo com a boca e mastigá-lo com suas centenas de milhares de dentes venenosos e engoli-lo. E quando ela o tiver engolido, você vai conhecer a doçura do gosto do sofrimento.” Not so…

As chorumelas do anti-nietzschiano nietzschiano: “Há o que pensar no fato de que a ética cristã já foi chamada uma ética de escravos. Por quem? Por anarquistas!”

Milton, o grande lutador, o grande puritano perturbador da paz espiritual, o trovador de Satã”

“They also serve who only stand and wait.”

O egotismo é o único remédio verdadeiro para o egoísmo, a avarícia espiritual, o vício de se preservar e reservar e não se esforçar para perenizar se dando e se doando.” O egotista é o egoísta religioso, verdadeiro devocionado, altruísta, indiferente a si, ao próprio corpo, melhor dizendo.

Dominicanos x quietistaspietism may be described as the irruption, or rather the persistence, of Catholic mysticism in the heart of Protestant rationalism.”

Cross his arms” em Inglês tem duplo sentido? Talvez três, quatro (revólveres).

<Esse mundo e o próximo são como duas esposas de um só marido—se ele agradar uma estará enciumando a outra>, disse um pensador árabe [tinha que ser!]

If I work without ceasing to the end, Nature is obliged (_so ist die Natur verpflichtet_) to provide me with another form of existence, since my actual spirit can bear no more.”

Goethe

May not the contemplative, medieval, monastic ideal be aesthetical, and not religious nor even ethical?”

a Companhia de Jesus, uma milícia com o mundo como seu campo de operações”

É curioso que monges e anarquistas devam estar em inimizade uns com os outros, quando fundamentalmente eles compartilham a mesma ética e estão aparentados por estreitos nós de companheirismo.” Ainda não entendi qual é a birra de Unamuno com os anarcos.

Kantism is Protestant, and we Spaniards are fundamentally Catholic.” Foda-se.

The people abhors comedy. When Pilate—the type of the refined gentleman, the superior person, the aesthete, the rationalist if you like—proposes to give the people comedy and mockingly presents Christ to them, saying, <Behold the man!> the people mutinies and shouts <Crucify him! Crucify him!> (…) And that which Dante, the great Catholic, called the Divine Comedy, is the most tragical tragedy that has ever been written.”

Participem do homem

And there is one figure, a comically tragic figure, a figure in which is revealed all that is profoundly tragic in the human comedy, the figure of Our Lord Don Quixote, the Spanish Christ”

Uma voz clamando no deserto!”—autodefinição de Isaías, 40:3.


UNAMUNO & SALAMANCA [curiosa sintonia profissional]

E, portanto, eu clamo com a voz de alguém que clama no deserto, e eu emito meu grito desta Universidade de Salamanca, uma Universidade que arrogantemente se estilizou <omnium scientiarum princeps> [“a melhor no ensino da ciência”, lema, até hoje, da instituição], a qual Carlyle chamou de baluarte da ignorância e a qual um letrado francês batizou recentemente de Universidade fantasma; eu grito alto desde essa Espanha—<a terra dos sonhos que se tornam realidades, a muralha da Europa, o lar do ideal cavalheiresco,> para citar uma carta que o poeta americano Archer M. Huntington me enviou outro dia—desde essa Espanha que foi a cabeça e a testa da Contra-Reforma no século XVI. E eles a recompensam muito bem por isso!”


And the famous maladie du siècle, which announced itself in Rousseau and was exhibited more plainly in Sénancour’s Obermann than in any other character, neither was nor is anything else but the loss of faith in the immortality of the soul, in the human finality of the Universe.”

immortality in mortality

And in Marlowe’s [primeiro autor a reintroduzir o mito na Europa moderna] Faust there is a scene that is worth the whole of the second part of the Faust of Goethe.”

all is dross [refugo; rebotalho] that is not Helen [personificação da Cultura, para Unamuno].”

Give me my soul again!–(…) For the primitive Faust has no ingenuous Margaret to save him. This idea of his salvation was the invention of Goethe”

invãção, a vã invenção; em vista da invasão.

devastação das flores devagarinho chegando e brotando

This Faust has studied Philosophy, Jurisprudence, Medicine, and even Theology, only to find that we can know nothing” “Mephistopheles, ever willing evil, ever achieves good in its own despite.” “Margaret, child of the simple-hearted people” “redeemed” “and everything ends among mystical choruses with the discovery of the eternal feminine. Poor Euphorion!”

And this Helen is the spouse of the fair Menelaus, the Helen whom Paris bore away, who was the cause of the war of Troy, and of whom the ancient Trojans said that no one should be incensed because men fought for a woman who bore so terrible a likeness to the immortal gods.” “For Helen with her kisses takes away our soul.” Um homem sem mulher é Eterno. Eu sou mortal.

Europe! This idea of Europe, primarily and immediately of geographical significance, has been converted for us by some magical process into a kind of metaphysical category.” “All this is due to the Renaissance and the Reformation, and to what was the offspring of these two, the Revolution, and to them we owe also a new Inquisition, that of science or culture, which turns against those who refuse to submit to its orthodoxy the weapons of ridicule and contempt.”

o moinho maldito não se mexe, meus miolos na testa sim.

Dentre o povo espanhol existe uma resposta singular para a costumária interrogação, <Como vai você?> e ela é <Vivendo.>” “Entre nós espanhóis outra frase ganhou rapidamente uso corrente, a expressão <É uma questão de (deixar) passar o tempo,> ou <matar o tempo.>” “pulamos da arte para a religião”


(INS)PIRADO

o tempo mata e morre

a qualquer tempo

o tempo todo

inter mi tente ser outra coisa que

não.

isso.

aqui.


A imensurável beleza da vida é uma coisa muito interessante sobre o que se escrever”

Para eles sua ciência, com a qual poderemos lucrar; para nós, nosso próprio trabalho.”

Foi ao se fazer ridículo que Dom Quixote atingiu sua imortalidade.” rindo do meu ânus espanhol

hoje, quando uma parcela dos desprivilegiados de massa cinzenta diz que nunca tivemos ciência, arte, filosofia, Renascença (disso tivemos talvez demasiado), nem nada, esses mesmos críticos sendo uns ignorantes de nossa real história, uma história que ainda está para ser escrita, a primeira tarefa sendo desfazer a teia de caluniação e revolta tecida ao redor dela.”

a Itália testemunhou uma união desnaturada e nefária entre Cristandade e Paganismo, isto é, entre imortalismo e mortalismo, uma união com a qual mesmo alguns dos Papas consentiram em suas almas”


Sempre haverá cross-overs existenciais… e pureza de estilo nisso

SS de sobrevivência secular

o ponto zero da vivissitura

Tudo está errado em Tessalônica

teça uma resposta finalmente

não-faraônica


Um livro escrito nas três primeiras décadas do séc. XX não pode estar livre do vírus chamado Nacionalismo: “Deixemos de lado os oito séculos em que a Espanha guerreou contra os Mouros, durante os quais defendeu a Europa do Maometismo, seu trabalho de unificação interna, sua descoberta da América e das Índias—porque foi a conquista de Espanha e Portugal, e não de Colombo e Vasco da Gama—deixemos tudo isso de parte, e mais que isso, a um lado, e não é pouca coisa.”

e no fim de tudo, a raça humana vai sucumbir exausta aos pés de uma pilha de bibliotecas, museus, máquinas, laboratórios …”

A fúria do Fascismo já brilha em seus olhos, em seu perfume de palavras, em sua peninha… Tão pequena, ah, ele não tem pena!…

Quase todos nós espanhóis recaímos no modo ridículo da literatura, alguns mais outros menos.” Quixotesco e bom, aparentemente!

Mama, eu vou conquistar a África!

O Dom Quixote como o Ramo de Ouro de toda uma etnia…

a segunda metade do século XIX, um período afilosófico, positivista, tecnicista, devotado à história pura e às ciências naturais, um período essencialmente materialista e pessimista.”

Mas é possível filosofar [não em Alemão mas] em álgebra aplicada ou mesmo em Esperanto?” All philosophy is, therefore, at bottom philology.” É, faz sentido (o filólogo mais precoce foi também o maior filósofo). Já li coisas mais extremadas neste grande livro-ensaio…

History is not mathematics, neither is philosophy. And how many philosophical ideas are not strictly owing to something akin to rhyme, to the necessity of rightly placing a consonant! In Kant himself there is a great deal of this, of aesthetic symmetry

and race, the blood of the spirit, is language” Eu sou doador universal

Love does not discover that it is love until it speaks, until it says, I love thee!” Verdade, sempre verdade. Ah, os poetas! Ah, nós, ah, eu… Nunca o “eles” nem o “vós”… O perigo de verbalizar TUDO. Eu tenho o emprego dos sonhos.

The real and concrete truth is: homo sum, ergo cogito.”

At bottom, philosophy abhors Christianity, and well did the gentle Marcus Aurelius prove it.” At bottom, all things could be all things, you see…

And the comic, the irrational tragedy is the tragedy of suffering caused by ridicule and contempt.” “The greatest height of heroism to which an individual, like a people, can attain is to know how to face ridicule; better still, to know how to make oneself ridiculous and not to shrink from the ridicule.”

we twin-brothers of the Atlantic seaboard have always been distinguished by a certain pedantry of feeling”

The religious is the transcendental economic or hedonic. (…) And with an insight that amounts to genius our Jesuits speak of the grand business of our salvation.”

the only reactionaries are those who find themselves at home in the present. Every supposed restoration of the past is a creation of the future, and if the past which it is sought to restore is a dream, something imperfectly known, so much the better. (…) he who marches is getting there, even though he march walking backwards.

St. Teresa is worth any institutions, any Critique of Pure Reason.”

How is it that among the words that English has borrowed from our language, such as siesta, camarilla, guerrilla, there is to be found this word desperdo?”

Spero quia absurdum, it ought to have been said, rather than credo.”

He fought for Dulcinea, and he won her, for he lives.”

Peace of mind, thanks to the providence of God, is no longer possible.”

In this world a man of culture is either a dilettante or a pedant: you have to take your choice.” op. cit.

A filosofia de Bergson foi chamada de uma filosofia semi-mundana.” “E ele afunda no desespero do século crítico cujas duas grandes vítimas foram Nietzsche e Tolstoi.”

Dom Quixote me lembra Carlos Gomes. Nada de Kafka!

To cry aloud, to cry aloud in the wilderness. (…) And may God deny you peace, but give you glory!

SALAMANCA, In the year of grace 1912.”